一种测量幼儿共同决策二元过程的工具的开发:为孩子做决定(MADE for Kids)调查。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Decision Making Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1177/0272989X251353216
Douglas J Opel, Elsa Ayala, Heather Spielvogle, Akram Ibrahim, Olivia Orr, Abril Beretta, Emily Kroshus, Elliott M Weiss, Chuan Zhou, Seema K Shah
{"title":"一种测量幼儿共同决策二元过程的工具的开发:为孩子做决定(MADE for Kids)调查。","authors":"Douglas J Opel, Elsa Ayala, Heather Spielvogle, Akram Ibrahim, Olivia Orr, Abril Beretta, Emily Kroshus, Elliott M Weiss, Chuan Zhou, Seema K Shah","doi":"10.1177/0272989X251353216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIncorporating clinician and patient perspectives in the measurement of shared decision making (SDM) is aligned with SDM's inherently dyadic nature. There are no tools measuring SDM in pediatrics from multiple perspectives. The objective of this study was to develop a tool to measure SDM from the perspectives of both clinicians and parents of young children.DesignWe used a stepwise iterative approach to tool development beginning with de novo item generation and followed by augmentation of the item pool by adapting items from existing instruments. After the study team removed redundant items, 3 parents and 3 SDM experts rated the remaining items for their ability to capture SDM in pediatrics; items with the lowest mean ratings were removed. To assess the preliminary tool's face validity, usability, and item understandability, we pretested it, revising it iteratively, with sequential cohorts of English-speaking parents and clinicians from 2 US children's hospitals.ResultsWe generated an initial list of 28 items for the parent and clinician versions of the tool, which we reduced to 20 items after preliminary review. After review by parents and SDM experts, we cut 9 items and added 1 additional item for a total of 12 items. We pretested the preliminary tool with 31 clinicians and 30 parents across 3 sequential cohorts. The final tool contained 12 items and an optional free-text item.LimitationsAll participants were English speaking, limiting its generalizability.ConclusionsWe have developed a usable preliminary tool for measuring the dyadic process of SDM in pediatrics.ImplicationsThis tool represents an important first step toward addressing the measurement of SDM in pediatrics from multiple perspectives.HighlightsIn this study, we have developed the first shared decision making (SDM) tool specifically for use with parents of young children.Although further study is needed to determine the psychometric properties of this tool, it has the potential to address an important gap in our ability to measure SDM in pediatrics from multiple perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":"834-848"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Tool to Measure the Dyadic Process of Shared Decision Making in Young Children: The Making Decisions for Kids (MADE for Kids) Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Douglas J Opel, Elsa Ayala, Heather Spielvogle, Akram Ibrahim, Olivia Orr, Abril Beretta, Emily Kroshus, Elliott M Weiss, Chuan Zhou, Seema K Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0272989X251353216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundIncorporating clinician and patient perspectives in the measurement of shared decision making (SDM) is aligned with SDM's inherently dyadic nature. There are no tools measuring SDM in pediatrics from multiple perspectives. The objective of this study was to develop a tool to measure SDM from the perspectives of both clinicians and parents of young children.DesignWe used a stepwise iterative approach to tool development beginning with de novo item generation and followed by augmentation of the item pool by adapting items from existing instruments. After the study team removed redundant items, 3 parents and 3 SDM experts rated the remaining items for their ability to capture SDM in pediatrics; items with the lowest mean ratings were removed. To assess the preliminary tool's face validity, usability, and item understandability, we pretested it, revising it iteratively, with sequential cohorts of English-speaking parents and clinicians from 2 US children's hospitals.ResultsWe generated an initial list of 28 items for the parent and clinician versions of the tool, which we reduced to 20 items after preliminary review. After review by parents and SDM experts, we cut 9 items and added 1 additional item for a total of 12 items. We pretested the preliminary tool with 31 clinicians and 30 parents across 3 sequential cohorts. The final tool contained 12 items and an optional free-text item.LimitationsAll participants were English speaking, limiting its generalizability.ConclusionsWe have developed a usable preliminary tool for measuring the dyadic process of SDM in pediatrics.ImplicationsThis tool represents an important first step toward addressing the measurement of SDM in pediatrics from multiple perspectives.HighlightsIn this study, we have developed the first shared decision making (SDM) tool specifically for use with parents of young children.Although further study is needed to determine the psychometric properties of this tool, it has the potential to address an important gap in our ability to measure SDM in pediatrics from multiple perspectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Decision Making\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"834-848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X251353216\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X251353216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在共同决策(SDM)的测量中结合临床医生和患者的观点与SDM固有的二元性是一致的。目前还没有工具可以从多个角度来衡量儿科的SDM。本研究的目的是开发一种工具,从临床医生和幼儿家长的角度来衡量SDM。设计:我们采用逐步迭代的方法进行工具开发,从从头生成项目开始,然后通过调整现有工具中的项目来增加项目池。在研究小组剔除冗余条目后,3位家长和3位SDM专家对剩余条目进行评价,评价他们对儿科SDM的捕捉能力;平均评分最低的项目被删除。为了评估初步工具的面部效度、可用性和项目可理解性,我们对其进行了预测试,并对其进行了迭代修订,其中包括来自美国两家儿童医院的英语家长和临床医生的连续队列。结果:我们为家长和临床医生版本的工具生成了一个包含28个项目的初始列表,经过初步审查,我们将其减少到20个项目。经过家长和SDM专家的审核,我们删减了9项,增加了1项,共计12项。我们在3个序列队列中对31名临床医生和30名家长进行了初步工具的预测试。最终的工具包含12个项目和一个可选的自由文本项目。所有的参与者都说英语,限制了其普遍性。结论我们开发了一种可用的初步工具来测量儿科SDM的双矢过程。该工具代表了从多个角度解决儿科SDM测量的重要的第一步。在这项研究中,我们开发了第一个专门用于幼儿父母的共享决策(SDM)工具。虽然需要进一步的研究来确定该工具的心理测量特性,但它有可能解决我们从多个角度测量儿科SDM能力的重要差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Tool to Measure the Dyadic Process of Shared Decision Making in Young Children: The Making Decisions for Kids (MADE for Kids) Survey.

BackgroundIncorporating clinician and patient perspectives in the measurement of shared decision making (SDM) is aligned with SDM's inherently dyadic nature. There are no tools measuring SDM in pediatrics from multiple perspectives. The objective of this study was to develop a tool to measure SDM from the perspectives of both clinicians and parents of young children.DesignWe used a stepwise iterative approach to tool development beginning with de novo item generation and followed by augmentation of the item pool by adapting items from existing instruments. After the study team removed redundant items, 3 parents and 3 SDM experts rated the remaining items for their ability to capture SDM in pediatrics; items with the lowest mean ratings were removed. To assess the preliminary tool's face validity, usability, and item understandability, we pretested it, revising it iteratively, with sequential cohorts of English-speaking parents and clinicians from 2 US children's hospitals.ResultsWe generated an initial list of 28 items for the parent and clinician versions of the tool, which we reduced to 20 items after preliminary review. After review by parents and SDM experts, we cut 9 items and added 1 additional item for a total of 12 items. We pretested the preliminary tool with 31 clinicians and 30 parents across 3 sequential cohorts. The final tool contained 12 items and an optional free-text item.LimitationsAll participants were English speaking, limiting its generalizability.ConclusionsWe have developed a usable preliminary tool for measuring the dyadic process of SDM in pediatrics.ImplicationsThis tool represents an important first step toward addressing the measurement of SDM in pediatrics from multiple perspectives.HighlightsIn this study, we have developed the first shared decision making (SDM) tool specifically for use with parents of young children.Although further study is needed to determine the psychometric properties of this tool, it has the potential to address an important gap in our ability to measure SDM in pediatrics from multiple perspectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信