制药公司促销付款对英语的一般做法:纵向研究。

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-08-08 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0281
Shai Mulinari, Minahil Malik, James Larkin, Mostafa Elsharkawy, Tom Fahey, Frank Moriarty, Piotr Ozieranski
{"title":"制药公司促销付款对英语的一般做法:纵向研究。","authors":"Shai Mulinari, Minahil Malik, James Larkin, Mostafa Elsharkawy, Tom Fahey, Frank Moriarty, Piotr Ozieranski","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practices have been a long-standing focus of pharmaceutical promotion, but their financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies remain understudied.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Examine pharmaceutical company payments to general practices in England from 2015-2022, focusing on changing patterns of payments and what this reveals about companies' marketing.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Descriptive analysis of pharmaceutical company payments made to practices using data from industry's Disclosure UK database, covering 4430 recipient practices and 54 companies over an eight-year period.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Annual Disclosure UK data from 2015-2022 were merged, identifying practices using a novel algorithm-based methodology, and categorising payments by type (eg, donations and grants, event sponsorship). Trends were analysed by company and payment type. The Gini coefficient measured payment concentration, and the persistence of relationships was assessed over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pharmaceutical payments to general practices rose from £2.5 million in 2015 to £7.5 million in 2022. While 54 companies made payments, just one company, Chiesi-marketing commonly prescribed respiratory inhalers-accounted for over 50% of the payment value from 2017 onwards. More than 40% of practices received payments from only one company, and 74% of company-practice relationships lasted just one study year. A few companies dominated, with a Gini coefficient of 0.86, driven by Chiesi's payments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The growing scale and concentration of payments and the dominance of one company raise concerns about bias in general practice. Future research should investigate the impact of payments on clinical decision-making, but to do so, payment disclosures need enhanced transparency, particularly through including product-specific payment details.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmaceutical company promotional payments to English general practices: longitudinal study.\",\"authors\":\"Shai Mulinari, Minahil Malik, James Larkin, Mostafa Elsharkawy, Tom Fahey, Frank Moriarty, Piotr Ozieranski\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practices have been a long-standing focus of pharmaceutical promotion, but their financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies remain understudied.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Examine pharmaceutical company payments to general practices in England from 2015-2022, focusing on changing patterns of payments and what this reveals about companies' marketing.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Descriptive analysis of pharmaceutical company payments made to practices using data from industry's Disclosure UK database, covering 4430 recipient practices and 54 companies over an eight-year period.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Annual Disclosure UK data from 2015-2022 were merged, identifying practices using a novel algorithm-based methodology, and categorising payments by type (eg, donations and grants, event sponsorship). Trends were analysed by company and payment type. The Gini coefficient measured payment concentration, and the persistence of relationships was assessed over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pharmaceutical payments to general practices rose from £2.5 million in 2015 to £7.5 million in 2022. While 54 companies made payments, just one company, Chiesi-marketing commonly prescribed respiratory inhalers-accounted for over 50% of the payment value from 2017 onwards. More than 40% of practices received payments from only one company, and 74% of company-practice relationships lasted just one study year. A few companies dominated, with a Gini coefficient of 0.86, driven by Chiesi's payments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The growing scale and concentration of payments and the dominance of one company raise concerns about bias in general practice. Future research should investigate the impact of payments on clinical decision-making, but to do so, payment disclosures need enhanced transparency, particularly through including product-specific payment details.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全科实践长期以来一直是医药推广的重点,但它们与制药公司的财务关系仍未得到充分研究。目的:研究2015-2022年英国制药公司对一般做法的支付,重点关注支付模式的变化以及这对公司营销的启示。设计与设置:使用行业披露英国数据库的数据,对制药公司向实践支付的款项进行描述性分析,涵盖4430个收件人实践和54家公司,为期8年。方法:合并2015-2022年英国年度披露数据,使用一种新的基于算法的方法确定实践,并按类型(如捐赠和赠款、活动赞助)对付款进行分类。根据公司和付款类型分析了趋势。基尼系数衡量支付集中度,并评估关系的持久性。结果:支付给全科医生的药费从2015年的250万英镑上升到2022年的750万英镑。虽然有54家公司支付了这笔款项,但从2017年起,只有一家公司——销售常用处方呼吸吸入器——占支付金额的50%以上。超过40%的执业人员只从一家公司获得报酬,74%的公司与执业人员的关系只持续了一个研究年度。少数几家公司占主导地位,在基耶西薪酬的推动下,基尼系数达到0.86。结论:不断增长的支付规模和集中度以及一家公司的主导地位引发了对一般实践中偏见的担忧。未来的研究应该调查支付对临床决策的影响,但要做到这一点,支付披露需要提高透明度,特别是通过包括特定产品的支付细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmaceutical company promotional payments to English general practices: longitudinal study.

Background: General practices have been a long-standing focus of pharmaceutical promotion, but their financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies remain understudied.

Aim: Examine pharmaceutical company payments to general practices in England from 2015-2022, focusing on changing patterns of payments and what this reveals about companies' marketing.

Design & setting: Descriptive analysis of pharmaceutical company payments made to practices using data from industry's Disclosure UK database, covering 4430 recipient practices and 54 companies over an eight-year period.

Method: Annual Disclosure UK data from 2015-2022 were merged, identifying practices using a novel algorithm-based methodology, and categorising payments by type (eg, donations and grants, event sponsorship). Trends were analysed by company and payment type. The Gini coefficient measured payment concentration, and the persistence of relationships was assessed over time.

Results: Pharmaceutical payments to general practices rose from £2.5 million in 2015 to £7.5 million in 2022. While 54 companies made payments, just one company, Chiesi-marketing commonly prescribed respiratory inhalers-accounted for over 50% of the payment value from 2017 onwards. More than 40% of practices received payments from only one company, and 74% of company-practice relationships lasted just one study year. A few companies dominated, with a Gini coefficient of 0.86, driven by Chiesi's payments.

Conclusion: The growing scale and concentration of payments and the dominance of one company raise concerns about bias in general practice. Future research should investigate the impact of payments on clinical decision-making, but to do so, payment disclosures need enhanced transparency, particularly through including product-specific payment details.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信