一线纳武单抗联合伊匹单抗治疗胸膜间皮瘤:来自真实MesoNet研究的疗效和安全性数据

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Lung Cancer Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108702
Rajiv Shah, Eva L Buchmeier, Hans-Georg Kopp, Daniel C Christoph, Frank Griesinger, Martin Reck, Petra Hoffknecht, Jonas Kuon, Nikolaj Frost, Christian Grohé, Martin Faehling, Jingting Luan, Julia Roeper, Paolo Chesi, Miriam Blasi, Martin Kimmich, Till Olchers, Helge Bischoff, Laura V Klotz, Inn Chung, Petros Christopoulos, Michael Thomas
{"title":"一线纳武单抗联合伊匹单抗治疗胸膜间皮瘤:来自真实MesoNet研究的疗效和安全性数据","authors":"Rajiv Shah, Eva L Buchmeier, Hans-Georg Kopp, Daniel C Christoph, Frank Griesinger, Martin Reck, Petra Hoffknecht, Jonas Kuon, Nikolaj Frost, Christian Grohé, Martin Faehling, Jingting Luan, Julia Roeper, Paolo Chesi, Miriam Blasi, Martin Kimmich, Till Olchers, Helge Bischoff, Laura V Klotz, Inn Chung, Petros Christopoulos, Michael Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the approval of nivolumab/ipilimumab, the prognosis of patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM) remains poor. Although this combination has shown improved survival in the landmark CheckMate (CM)-743 trial, evidence from real-world settings remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, multicenter study, the outcome and safety data for 135 consecutive patients with first-line nivolumab/ipilimumab were evaluated among 1,575 adult patients with PM from 12 German cancer centers. Radiologic response and progression were analyzed according to the revised modified RECIST criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall survival (OS) was 13.1 months for the unselected real-world cohort, and 15.5 months for CM-743-eligible patients (16.7 months for the non-epithelioid and 10 months for the epithelioid subtypes). Patients who experienced partial responses to nivolumab/ipilimumab had significantly longer survival than those without (24 months vs. 10.3 months; p = 0.00026). 37 % of patients experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs), among whom 58 % had grade 3/4 toxicity. IrAEs of any grade were associated with longer survival (17.3 months vs. 11.7 months for patients without irAEs; p = 0.022). Furthermore, grade 1/2 irAEs were associated with even better outcomes when compared to grade 3/4 toxicities (22.7 months vs. 16.7 months median OS) and absence of toxicity (p < 0.0167 for trend).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall survival with first-line nivolumab/ipilimumab in the real-world setting is comparable to the CM-743 results among trial-eligible patients, especially with non-epithelioid tumors, but shorter for the unselected cohort. IrAEs, in particular those of low-grade, were associated with better outcomes. In the absence of predictive biomarkers and with few therapeutic options available, both dual checkpoint blockade and platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy remain viable first-line regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"207 ","pages":"108702"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in pleural mesothelioma: Efficacy and safety data from the real-world MesoNet study.\",\"authors\":\"Rajiv Shah, Eva L Buchmeier, Hans-Georg Kopp, Daniel C Christoph, Frank Griesinger, Martin Reck, Petra Hoffknecht, Jonas Kuon, Nikolaj Frost, Christian Grohé, Martin Faehling, Jingting Luan, Julia Roeper, Paolo Chesi, Miriam Blasi, Martin Kimmich, Till Olchers, Helge Bischoff, Laura V Klotz, Inn Chung, Petros Christopoulos, Michael Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the approval of nivolumab/ipilimumab, the prognosis of patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM) remains poor. Although this combination has shown improved survival in the landmark CheckMate (CM)-743 trial, evidence from real-world settings remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, multicenter study, the outcome and safety data for 135 consecutive patients with first-line nivolumab/ipilimumab were evaluated among 1,575 adult patients with PM from 12 German cancer centers. Radiologic response and progression were analyzed according to the revised modified RECIST criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall survival (OS) was 13.1 months for the unselected real-world cohort, and 15.5 months for CM-743-eligible patients (16.7 months for the non-epithelioid and 10 months for the epithelioid subtypes). Patients who experienced partial responses to nivolumab/ipilimumab had significantly longer survival than those without (24 months vs. 10.3 months; p = 0.00026). 37 % of patients experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs), among whom 58 % had grade 3/4 toxicity. IrAEs of any grade were associated with longer survival (17.3 months vs. 11.7 months for patients without irAEs; p = 0.022). Furthermore, grade 1/2 irAEs were associated with even better outcomes when compared to grade 3/4 toxicities (22.7 months vs. 16.7 months median OS) and absence of toxicity (p < 0.0167 for trend).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall survival with first-line nivolumab/ipilimumab in the real-world setting is comparable to the CM-743 results among trial-eligible patients, especially with non-epithelioid tumors, but shorter for the unselected cohort. IrAEs, in particular those of low-grade, were associated with better outcomes. In the absence of predictive biomarkers and with few therapeutic options available, both dual checkpoint blockade and platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy remain viable first-line regimens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung Cancer\",\"volume\":\"207 \",\"pages\":\"108702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108702\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管nivolumab/ipilimumab已获批,但胸膜间皮瘤(PM)患者的预后仍然很差。尽管在具有里程碑意义的CheckMate (CM)-743试验中,这种组合显示出了生存率的提高,但来自现实环境的证据仍然有限。方法:在这项回顾性的多中心研究中,来自德国12个癌症中心的1575名成年PM患者中,对135名连续使用一线nivolumab/ipilimumab的患者的结局和安全性数据进行了评估。根据修订后的RECIST标准分析放射反应和进展。结果:未选择的真实世界队列的中位总生存期(OS)为13.1个月,cm -743符合条件的患者为15.5个月(非上皮样亚型为16.7个月,上皮样亚型为10个月)。对纳武单抗/伊匹单抗有部分反应的患者的生存期明显长于无部分反应的患者(24个月vs 10.3个月;p = 0.00026)。37%的患者出现免疫相关不良事件(irAEs),其中58%为3/4级毒性。任何级别的irae都与更长的生存期相关(17.3个月vs. 11.7个月);p = 0.022)。此外,与3/4级毒性(22.7个月vs 16.7个月中位OS)和无毒性(p)相比,1/2级irae与更好的结果相关。结论:在现实环境中,一线nivolumab/ipilimumab在符合试验条件的患者中的总体生存期与CM-743结果相当,特别是非上皮样肿瘤患者,但未选择队列的生存期较短。irae,特别是那些低等级的irae,与更好的结果相关。在缺乏预测性生物标志物和治疗选择很少的情况下,双检查点阻断和铂-培美曲塞化疗仍然是可行的一线方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in pleural mesothelioma: Efficacy and safety data from the real-world MesoNet study.

Background: Despite the approval of nivolumab/ipilimumab, the prognosis of patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM) remains poor. Although this combination has shown improved survival in the landmark CheckMate (CM)-743 trial, evidence from real-world settings remains limited.

Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter study, the outcome and safety data for 135 consecutive patients with first-line nivolumab/ipilimumab were evaluated among 1,575 adult patients with PM from 12 German cancer centers. Radiologic response and progression were analyzed according to the revised modified RECIST criteria.

Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 13.1 months for the unselected real-world cohort, and 15.5 months for CM-743-eligible patients (16.7 months for the non-epithelioid and 10 months for the epithelioid subtypes). Patients who experienced partial responses to nivolumab/ipilimumab had significantly longer survival than those without (24 months vs. 10.3 months; p = 0.00026). 37 % of patients experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs), among whom 58 % had grade 3/4 toxicity. IrAEs of any grade were associated with longer survival (17.3 months vs. 11.7 months for patients without irAEs; p = 0.022). Furthermore, grade 1/2 irAEs were associated with even better outcomes when compared to grade 3/4 toxicities (22.7 months vs. 16.7 months median OS) and absence of toxicity (p < 0.0167 for trend).

Conclusions: Overall survival with first-line nivolumab/ipilimumab in the real-world setting is comparable to the CM-743 results among trial-eligible patients, especially with non-epithelioid tumors, but shorter for the unselected cohort. IrAEs, in particular those of low-grade, were associated with better outcomes. In the absence of predictive biomarkers and with few therapeutic options available, both dual checkpoint blockade and platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy remain viable first-line regimens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lung Cancer
Lung Cancer 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
407
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信