拔管后立即“啜饮”vs.延迟口服液体摄入:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Šárka Sedláčková, Věra Nigrovičová, Monika Pecková, Miroslav Durila
{"title":"拔管后立即“啜饮”vs.延迟口服液体摄入:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Šárka Sedláčková, Věra Nigrovičová, Monika Pecková, Miroslav Durila","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite advances in perioperative care, delayed oral fluid intake after extubation remains common and is often based on tradition rather than evidence. This study aimed to evaluate whether immediate oral fluid intake \"sipping\" after extubation reduces thirst and discomfort and is safe in an intensive care setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial, 160 ICU patients who met extubation criteria were randomized 1:1 to either delayed fluid intake (2 h post-extubation) or immediate sipping (up to 3 ml/kg over 2 h). Thirst, discomfort, and adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, aspiration) were assessed at 0, 5, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Thirst relief was also evaluated in the experimental group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 120 min, 64 of 80 patients in each group (80 %; 95 % CI: 70-88 %) reported thirst. The difference between groups was 0.0 % (95 % CI: -12 % to 12 %; p = 1.000). However, thirst relief between baseline and 120 min was observed in 11.3 % of patients in the sipping group (95 % CI: 5-20 %) vs. 1.3 % in the standard group (95 % CI: 0-7 %), with a difference of 10 % (95 % CI: 1-19 %; p = 0.0338). At 90 min, throat discomfort was present in 23.8 % of the sipping group (95 % CI: 15-35 %) vs. 42.5 % in the standard group (95 % CI: 32-54 %), with a difference of -18.7 % (95 % CI: -34 % to -3 %; p = 0.0118). Adverse effects (nausea, vomiting) were rare and comparable; no aspiration events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immediate oral fluid intake \"sipping\"after extubation appears to be safe, improves thirst relief, and reduces discomfort in ICU patients without increasing adverse effects. These findings challenge traditional fasting practices and support early rehydration in post-extubation care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on January 6, 2023 (Identifier: NCT05819645).</p>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"91 ","pages":"155212"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immediate \\\"sipping\\\" vs. delayed oral fluid intake after extubation: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Šárka Sedláčková, Věra Nigrovičová, Monika Pecková, Miroslav Durila\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite advances in perioperative care, delayed oral fluid intake after extubation remains common and is often based on tradition rather than evidence. This study aimed to evaluate whether immediate oral fluid intake \\\"sipping\\\" after extubation reduces thirst and discomfort and is safe in an intensive care setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial, 160 ICU patients who met extubation criteria were randomized 1:1 to either delayed fluid intake (2 h post-extubation) or immediate sipping (up to 3 ml/kg over 2 h). Thirst, discomfort, and adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, aspiration) were assessed at 0, 5, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Thirst relief was also evaluated in the experimental group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 120 min, 64 of 80 patients in each group (80 %; 95 % CI: 70-88 %) reported thirst. The difference between groups was 0.0 % (95 % CI: -12 % to 12 %; p = 1.000). However, thirst relief between baseline and 120 min was observed in 11.3 % of patients in the sipping group (95 % CI: 5-20 %) vs. 1.3 % in the standard group (95 % CI: 0-7 %), with a difference of 10 % (95 % CI: 1-19 %; p = 0.0338). At 90 min, throat discomfort was present in 23.8 % of the sipping group (95 % CI: 15-35 %) vs. 42.5 % in the standard group (95 % CI: 32-54 %), with a difference of -18.7 % (95 % CI: -34 % to -3 %; p = 0.0118). Adverse effects (nausea, vomiting) were rare and comparable; no aspiration events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immediate oral fluid intake \\\"sipping\\\"after extubation appears to be safe, improves thirst relief, and reduces discomfort in ICU patients without increasing adverse effects. These findings challenge traditional fasting practices and support early rehydration in post-extubation care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on January 6, 2023 (Identifier: NCT05819645).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"volume\":\"91 \",\"pages\":\"155212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155212\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管围手术期护理取得了进展,拔管后延迟口服液体摄入仍然很常见,而且往往是基于传统而不是证据。本研究旨在评估拔管后立即口服液体“啜饮”是否能减少口渴和不适,以及在重症监护环境中是否安全。方法:在这项单中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验中,160例符合拔管标准的ICU患者按1:1的比例随机分为延迟补液组(拔管后2小时)和立即补液组(2小时内补液量为3ml /kg)。在0、5、30、60、90和120分钟时评估口渴、不适和不良反应(恶心、呕吐、误吸)。实验组的口渴缓解情况也进行了评估。结果:120min时,两组80例患者中64例(80%;95% CI: 70- 88%)报告口渴。组间差异为0.0% (95% CI: - 12% ~ 12%;p = 1.000)。然而,在基线和120分钟之间,饮用组中11.3%的患者口渴缓解(95% CI: 5- 20%),而标准组中为1.3% (95% CI: 0- 7%),差异为10% (95% CI: 1- 19%;p = 0.0338)。在90分钟时,咽喉部不适的发生率为23.8% (95% CI: 15- 35%),而标准组为42.5% (95% CI: 32- 54%),差异为- 18.7% (95% CI: - 34%至- 3%;p = 0.0118)。不良反应(恶心、呕吐)罕见且具有可比性;未观察到误吸事件。结论:拔管后立即口服液体“啜饮”似乎是安全的,可以改善口渴缓解,减少ICU患者的不适,而不会增加不良反应。这些发现挑战了传统的禁食做法,并支持拔管后护理的早期补液。试验注册:该试验于2023年1月6日在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(标识符:NCT05819645)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immediate "sipping" vs. delayed oral fluid intake after extubation: A randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: Despite advances in perioperative care, delayed oral fluid intake after extubation remains common and is often based on tradition rather than evidence. This study aimed to evaluate whether immediate oral fluid intake "sipping" after extubation reduces thirst and discomfort and is safe in an intensive care setting.

Methods: In this single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial, 160 ICU patients who met extubation criteria were randomized 1:1 to either delayed fluid intake (2 h post-extubation) or immediate sipping (up to 3 ml/kg over 2 h). Thirst, discomfort, and adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, aspiration) were assessed at 0, 5, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Thirst relief was also evaluated in the experimental group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: At 120 min, 64 of 80 patients in each group (80 %; 95 % CI: 70-88 %) reported thirst. The difference between groups was 0.0 % (95 % CI: -12 % to 12 %; p = 1.000). However, thirst relief between baseline and 120 min was observed in 11.3 % of patients in the sipping group (95 % CI: 5-20 %) vs. 1.3 % in the standard group (95 % CI: 0-7 %), with a difference of 10 % (95 % CI: 1-19 %; p = 0.0338). At 90 min, throat discomfort was present in 23.8 % of the sipping group (95 % CI: 15-35 %) vs. 42.5 % in the standard group (95 % CI: 32-54 %), with a difference of -18.7 % (95 % CI: -34 % to -3 %; p = 0.0118). Adverse effects (nausea, vomiting) were rare and comparable; no aspiration events were observed.

Conclusion: Immediate oral fluid intake "sipping"after extubation appears to be safe, improves thirst relief, and reduces discomfort in ICU patients without increasing adverse effects. These findings challenge traditional fasting practices and support early rehydration in post-extubation care.

Trial registration: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on January 6, 2023 (Identifier: NCT05819645).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信