信息长度和实施意图对体重管理策略依从性的影响:实验研究。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Khaleda Ahmadyar, Joanna Szypula, Angeliki Bogosian, Katy Tapper
{"title":"信息长度和实施意图对体重管理策略依从性的影响:实验研究。","authors":"Khaleda Ahmadyar, Joanna Szypula, Angeliki Bogosian, Katy Tapper","doi":"10.2196/65260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adherence to weight management strategies may be undermined where lengthy strategy explanations limit engagement and understanding, weakening intervention efficacy. By contrast, implementation intentions have been shown to promote adherence across various health behaviors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the impact of explanation length and implementation intentions on adherence to brief weight management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N=200) with a BMI above 25 and an interest in losing weight were recruited from a commercial digital weight management service provider. Participants received information about 1 of 4 weight management strategies on a smartphone app in either a brief or detailed format and were asked to plan their use of the strategy with implementation intentions or were given tips on strategy use. Participants received daily prompts over a 2-week period to report whether they used their assigned strategy. Proposed moderators (need for cognition and planning skills) were measured at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strategy adherence was greater with brief information (mean 74%, SD 23%) compared with detailed information (mean 69%, SD 23%); however, this small effect size (Cohen d=0.24) was not statistically significant (P=.13). There was no moderation by need for cognition (P=.25). Adherence did not differ significantly between implementation intentions (mean 71%, SD 27%) and tips (mean 72%, SD 21%; P=.73); however, there was moderation by planning skills (P=.04). As predicted, adherence was greater with implementation intentions compared with tips among those with poorer planning skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shorter explanation length and implementation intentions (in poorer planners) may enhance adherence to brief weight management strategies, and further investigation is required to confirm these effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":14756,"journal":{"name":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","volume":"13 ","pages":"e65260"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Information Length and Implementation Intentions on Adherence to Weight Management Strategies: Experimental Study.\",\"authors\":\"Khaleda Ahmadyar, Joanna Szypula, Angeliki Bogosian, Katy Tapper\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/65260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adherence to weight management strategies may be undermined where lengthy strategy explanations limit engagement and understanding, weakening intervention efficacy. By contrast, implementation intentions have been shown to promote adherence across various health behaviors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the impact of explanation length and implementation intentions on adherence to brief weight management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N=200) with a BMI above 25 and an interest in losing weight were recruited from a commercial digital weight management service provider. Participants received information about 1 of 4 weight management strategies on a smartphone app in either a brief or detailed format and were asked to plan their use of the strategy with implementation intentions or were given tips on strategy use. Participants received daily prompts over a 2-week period to report whether they used their assigned strategy. Proposed moderators (need for cognition and planning skills) were measured at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strategy adherence was greater with brief information (mean 74%, SD 23%) compared with detailed information (mean 69%, SD 23%); however, this small effect size (Cohen d=0.24) was not statistically significant (P=.13). There was no moderation by need for cognition (P=.25). Adherence did not differ significantly between implementation intentions (mean 71%, SD 27%) and tips (mean 72%, SD 21%; P=.73); however, there was moderation by planning skills (P=.04). As predicted, adherence was greater with implementation intentions compared with tips among those with poorer planning skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shorter explanation length and implementation intentions (in poorer planners) may enhance adherence to brief weight management strategies, and further investigation is required to confirm these effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR mHealth and uHealth\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"e65260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334108/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR mHealth and uHealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/65260\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65260","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:如果冗长的策略解释限制了参与和理解,可能会破坏对体重管理策略的依从性,削弱干预效果。相比之下,实施意图已被证明可以促进各种健康行为的坚持。目的:本研究旨在探讨解释长度和实施意图对遵守简短体重管理策略的影响。方法:从商业数字体重管理服务提供商中招募BMI高于25并对减肥感兴趣的参与者(N=200)。参与者在智能手机应用程序上以简短或详细的格式收到关于四种体重管理策略中的一种的信息,并被要求计划使用具有实施意图的策略,或者获得策略使用的提示。参与者在两周内每天收到提示,报告他们是否使用了指定的策略。建议的调节因素(对认知和计划技能的需求)在基线上进行测量。结果:与详细信息(平均69%,SD 23%)相比,简要信息的策略依从性更高(平均74%,SD 23%);然而,这个小效应量(Cohen d=0.24)没有统计学意义(P= 0.13)。认知需求不存在调节作用(P= 0.25)。依从性在实施意图(平均71%,标准差27%)和提示(平均72%,标准差21%)之间无显著差异;P = =收);然而,计划技能有调节作用(P=.04)。正如预测的那样,与计划技能较差的人相比,执行意图的依从性更高。结论:较短的解释长度和实施意图(在较差的计划者中)可能会增强对简短体重管理策略的依从性,需要进一步的调查来证实这些效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of Information Length and Implementation Intentions on Adherence to Weight Management Strategies: Experimental Study.

Effects of Information Length and Implementation Intentions on Adherence to Weight Management Strategies: Experimental Study.

Effects of Information Length and Implementation Intentions on Adherence to Weight Management Strategies: Experimental Study.

Background: Adherence to weight management strategies may be undermined where lengthy strategy explanations limit engagement and understanding, weakening intervention efficacy. By contrast, implementation intentions have been shown to promote adherence across various health behaviors.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the impact of explanation length and implementation intentions on adherence to brief weight management strategies.

Methods: Participants (N=200) with a BMI above 25 and an interest in losing weight were recruited from a commercial digital weight management service provider. Participants received information about 1 of 4 weight management strategies on a smartphone app in either a brief or detailed format and were asked to plan their use of the strategy with implementation intentions or were given tips on strategy use. Participants received daily prompts over a 2-week period to report whether they used their assigned strategy. Proposed moderators (need for cognition and planning skills) were measured at baseline.

Results: Strategy adherence was greater with brief information (mean 74%, SD 23%) compared with detailed information (mean 69%, SD 23%); however, this small effect size (Cohen d=0.24) was not statistically significant (P=.13). There was no moderation by need for cognition (P=.25). Adherence did not differ significantly between implementation intentions (mean 71%, SD 27%) and tips (mean 72%, SD 21%; P=.73); however, there was moderation by planning skills (P=.04). As predicted, adherence was greater with implementation intentions compared with tips among those with poorer planning skills.

Conclusions: Shorter explanation length and implementation intentions (in poorer planners) may enhance adherence to brief weight management strategies, and further investigation is required to confirm these effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
JMIR mHealth and uHealth Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
159
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (JMU, ISSN 2291-5222) is a spin-off journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR mHealth and uHealth is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), and in June 2017 received a stunning inaugural Impact Factor of 4.636. The journal focusses on health and biomedical applications in mobile and tablet computing, pervasive and ubiquitous computing, wearable computing and domotics. JMIR mHealth and uHealth publishes since 2013 and was the first mhealth journal in Pubmed. It publishes even faster and has a broader scope with including papers which are more technical or more formative/developmental than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信