{"title":"低管电位超高分辨率冠状动脉CTA与光子计数检测器CT用于支架评估:一项比较可行性研究。","authors":"Suguru Araki, Satoshi Nakamura, Shiko Okabe, Masafumi Takafuji, Yasutaka Ichikawa, Hajime Sakuma, Kakuya Kitagawa","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01846-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of low-tube-potential ultra-high-resolution (UHR) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison to low-tube-potential CCTA using energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT), with a specific focus on the evaluation of coronary stents.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 54 patients (88 stents) who underwent CCTA in UHR mode on PCD-CT at low tube potential (PCD<sub>UHR</sub>-low; 27 patients [45 stents]) or CCTA with EID-CT at low tube potential (EID-low; 27 patients [43 stents]). The EID-low cohort was selected by propensity score matching to the PCD<sub>UHR</sub>-low cohort. Image quality of in-stent lumen was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale, with a score of 4 indicating \"excellent.\" Quantitative assessment of stents included stent-induced blooming, edge sharpness, stent full width at half maximum (FWHM) and ΔHU<sub>in-stent</sub> which quantifies the increase in CT attenuation within the stent lumen. Radiation dose was evaluated using CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCD<sub>UHR</sub>-low had higher image quality scores than EID-low (scores of 3 and 4, 82.2% vs. 53.5%; p = 0.02). PCD<sub>UHR</sub>-low showed reduced stent-induced blooming, superior edge sharpness, smaller stent FWHM and smaller ΔHU<sub>in-stent</sub> than EID-low (all, p < 0.01). CTDIvol and DLP in PCD<sub>UHR</sub>-low (9.3 ± 4.4 mGy and 107.1 ± 50.4 mGy・cm) were comparable to those of EID-low (10.5 ± 5.9 mGy and 118.2 ± 74.9 mGy・cm), respectively. (p = 0.26 and 0.47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCTA using UHR mode in PCD-CT at low tube potential achieved superior image quality for implanted stent visualization as compared to EID-CT at low tube potential, while maintaining comparable radiation doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-tube-potential ultra-high-resolution coronary CTA with photon-counting detector CT for stent evaluation: a comparative feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Suguru Araki, Satoshi Nakamura, Shiko Okabe, Masafumi Takafuji, Yasutaka Ichikawa, Hajime Sakuma, Kakuya Kitagawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-025-01846-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of low-tube-potential ultra-high-resolution (UHR) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison to low-tube-potential CCTA using energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT), with a specific focus on the evaluation of coronary stents.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 54 patients (88 stents) who underwent CCTA in UHR mode on PCD-CT at low tube potential (PCD<sub>UHR</sub>-low; 27 patients [45 stents]) or CCTA with EID-CT at low tube potential (EID-low; 27 patients [43 stents]). The EID-low cohort was selected by propensity score matching to the PCD<sub>UHR</sub>-low cohort. Image quality of in-stent lumen was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale, with a score of 4 indicating \\\"excellent.\\\" Quantitative assessment of stents included stent-induced blooming, edge sharpness, stent full width at half maximum (FWHM) and ΔHU<sub>in-stent</sub> which quantifies the increase in CT attenuation within the stent lumen. Radiation dose was evaluated using CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCD<sub>UHR</sub>-low had higher image quality scores than EID-low (scores of 3 and 4, 82.2% vs. 53.5%; p = 0.02). PCD<sub>UHR</sub>-low showed reduced stent-induced blooming, superior edge sharpness, smaller stent FWHM and smaller ΔHU<sub>in-stent</sub> than EID-low (all, p < 0.01). CTDIvol and DLP in PCD<sub>UHR</sub>-low (9.3 ± 4.4 mGy and 107.1 ± 50.4 mGy・cm) were comparable to those of EID-low (10.5 ± 5.9 mGy and 118.2 ± 74.9 mGy・cm), respectively. (p = 0.26 and 0.47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCTA using UHR mode in PCD-CT at low tube potential achieved superior image quality for implanted stent visualization as compared to EID-CT at low tube potential, while maintaining comparable radiation doses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01846-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01846-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Low-tube-potential ultra-high-resolution coronary CTA with photon-counting detector CT for stent evaluation: a comparative feasibility study.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of low-tube-potential ultra-high-resolution (UHR) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison to low-tube-potential CCTA using energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT), with a specific focus on the evaluation of coronary stents.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 54 patients (88 stents) who underwent CCTA in UHR mode on PCD-CT at low tube potential (PCDUHR-low; 27 patients [45 stents]) or CCTA with EID-CT at low tube potential (EID-low; 27 patients [43 stents]). The EID-low cohort was selected by propensity score matching to the PCDUHR-low cohort. Image quality of in-stent lumen was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale, with a score of 4 indicating "excellent." Quantitative assessment of stents included stent-induced blooming, edge sharpness, stent full width at half maximum (FWHM) and ΔHUin-stent which quantifies the increase in CT attenuation within the stent lumen. Radiation dose was evaluated using CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP).
Results: PCDUHR-low had higher image quality scores than EID-low (scores of 3 and 4, 82.2% vs. 53.5%; p = 0.02). PCDUHR-low showed reduced stent-induced blooming, superior edge sharpness, smaller stent FWHM and smaller ΔHUin-stent than EID-low (all, p < 0.01). CTDIvol and DLP in PCDUHR-low (9.3 ± 4.4 mGy and 107.1 ± 50.4 mGy・cm) were comparable to those of EID-low (10.5 ± 5.9 mGy and 118.2 ± 74.9 mGy・cm), respectively. (p = 0.26 and 0.47).
Conclusion: CCTA using UHR mode in PCD-CT at low tube potential achieved superior image quality for implanted stent visualization as compared to EID-CT at low tube potential, while maintaining comparable radiation doses.
期刊介绍:
Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.