优化牛胚胎中高效基因组编辑CRISPR/Cas9核糖核蛋白的传递。

IF 2.4 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Gene Pub Date : 2025-09-20 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.gene.2025.149715
Xiaofeng Du, Alexander Quinn, Moira Menzies, Laercio R Porto-Neto
{"title":"优化牛胚胎中高效基因组编辑CRISPR/Cas9核糖核蛋白的传递。","authors":"Xiaofeng Du, Alexander Quinn, Moira Menzies, Laercio R Porto-Neto","doi":"10.1016/j.gene.2025.149715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assist in establishing a streamlined and efficient workflow for generating gene-edited bovine embryos, we evaluated three transfection approaches for the delivery of CRISPR Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoproteins into bovine zygotes: lipofection with Lipofectamine CRISPRMAX, and electroporation using either Neon or NEPA21 electroporation systems. Bos taurus prolactin receptor (PRLR) was used as the target gene. The PRLR editing outcomes were analysed by PCR genotyping and Sanger sequencing of individual embryos at day 8 post-fertilization. CRISPRMAX transfection generated up to 30 % PRLR-edited blastocysts (8 % homozygous deletion), without affecting the embryo cleavage (93 %) and blastocyst rate (39 %) relative to non-transfected controls. For both NEPA21 and Neon electroporation, we found that increasing the voltage, length and number of pulses resulted in enhanced gene editing efficiency but compromised embryo cleavage and blastocyst rates. NEPA21 electroporation with a commercial electroporation enhancer reagent produced up to 47.6 % transfected embryos with the PRLR deletion, but with decreased embryo cleavage (62 %) and blastocyst (18 %) rates. Combining NEPA21 electroporation with CRISPRMAX lipofection enhanced the gene editing efficiency to 50 % (23 % homozygous editing), with 64 % embryo cleavage rate and 18 % blastocyst rate. Notably, Neon electroporation resulted in 65.2 % PRLR-edited blastocysts with 21 % homozygous editing (50% cleavage rate and 10 % blastocyst rate). Additional studies may be necessary to further optimize electroporation parameters to achieve an optimal balance between embryo viability and gene editing efficiency. These outcomes will provide valuable insights for improving gene editing workflows for bovines and may help to promote and accelerate the widespread implementation of genome editing technology in livestock.</p>","PeriodicalId":12499,"journal":{"name":"Gene","volume":" ","pages":"149715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing the delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins for efficient genome editing in bovine embryos.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaofeng Du, Alexander Quinn, Moira Menzies, Laercio R Porto-Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gene.2025.149715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To assist in establishing a streamlined and efficient workflow for generating gene-edited bovine embryos, we evaluated three transfection approaches for the delivery of CRISPR Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoproteins into bovine zygotes: lipofection with Lipofectamine CRISPRMAX, and electroporation using either Neon or NEPA21 electroporation systems. Bos taurus prolactin receptor (PRLR) was used as the target gene. The PRLR editing outcomes were analysed by PCR genotyping and Sanger sequencing of individual embryos at day 8 post-fertilization. CRISPRMAX transfection generated up to 30 % PRLR-edited blastocysts (8 % homozygous deletion), without affecting the embryo cleavage (93 %) and blastocyst rate (39 %) relative to non-transfected controls. For both NEPA21 and Neon electroporation, we found that increasing the voltage, length and number of pulses resulted in enhanced gene editing efficiency but compromised embryo cleavage and blastocyst rates. NEPA21 electroporation with a commercial electroporation enhancer reagent produced up to 47.6 % transfected embryos with the PRLR deletion, but with decreased embryo cleavage (62 %) and blastocyst (18 %) rates. Combining NEPA21 electroporation with CRISPRMAX lipofection enhanced the gene editing efficiency to 50 % (23 % homozygous editing), with 64 % embryo cleavage rate and 18 % blastocyst rate. Notably, Neon electroporation resulted in 65.2 % PRLR-edited blastocysts with 21 % homozygous editing (50% cleavage rate and 10 % blastocyst rate). Additional studies may be necessary to further optimize electroporation parameters to achieve an optimal balance between embryo viability and gene editing efficiency. These outcomes will provide valuable insights for improving gene editing workflows for bovines and may help to promote and accelerate the widespread implementation of genome editing technology in livestock.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"149715\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2025.149715\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gene","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2025.149715","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了帮助建立一个简化和高效的工作流程来生成基因编辑的牛胚胎,我们评估了三种转染方法来将CRISPR Cas9-sgRNA核糖核蛋白传递到牛受精卵中:用Lipofectamine CRISPRMAX进行脂肪转染,以及使用Neon或NEPA21电穿孔系统进行电穿孔。以牛泌乳素受体(PRLR)为靶基因。通过对受精后第8天的单个胚胎进行PCR基因分型和Sanger测序,分析PRLR编辑结果。与未转染的对照组相比,转染CRISPRMAX可产生高达30%的prlr编辑囊胚(8%纯合缺失),而不影响胚胎切割(93%)和囊胚率(39%)。对于NEPA21和Neon电穿孔,我们发现增加脉冲电压、长度和次数可以提高基因编辑效率,但会降低胚胎切割和囊胚率。用商业电穿孔增强试剂电穿孔NEPA21产生47.6%的PRLR缺失的转染胚胎,但胚胎裂解率(62%)和囊胚率(18%)下降。NEPA21电穿孔与CRISPRMAX脂肪转染相结合,将基因编辑效率提高到50%(纯合编辑23%),胚胎切割率为64%,囊胚率为18%。值得注意的是,氖电穿孔导致65.2%的prlr编辑囊胚和21%的纯合子编辑囊胚(50%的卵裂率和10%的囊胚率)。可能需要进一步的研究来进一步优化电穿孔参数,以实现胚胎活力和基因编辑效率之间的最佳平衡。这些结果将为改善牛的基因编辑工作流程提供有价值的见解,并可能有助于促进和加速基因组编辑技术在牲畜中的广泛实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing the delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins for efficient genome editing in bovine embryos.

To assist in establishing a streamlined and efficient workflow for generating gene-edited bovine embryos, we evaluated three transfection approaches for the delivery of CRISPR Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoproteins into bovine zygotes: lipofection with Lipofectamine CRISPRMAX, and electroporation using either Neon or NEPA21 electroporation systems. Bos taurus prolactin receptor (PRLR) was used as the target gene. The PRLR editing outcomes were analysed by PCR genotyping and Sanger sequencing of individual embryos at day 8 post-fertilization. CRISPRMAX transfection generated up to 30 % PRLR-edited blastocysts (8 % homozygous deletion), without affecting the embryo cleavage (93 %) and blastocyst rate (39 %) relative to non-transfected controls. For both NEPA21 and Neon electroporation, we found that increasing the voltage, length and number of pulses resulted in enhanced gene editing efficiency but compromised embryo cleavage and blastocyst rates. NEPA21 electroporation with a commercial electroporation enhancer reagent produced up to 47.6 % transfected embryos with the PRLR deletion, but with decreased embryo cleavage (62 %) and blastocyst (18 %) rates. Combining NEPA21 electroporation with CRISPRMAX lipofection enhanced the gene editing efficiency to 50 % (23 % homozygous editing), with 64 % embryo cleavage rate and 18 % blastocyst rate. Notably, Neon electroporation resulted in 65.2 % PRLR-edited blastocysts with 21 % homozygous editing (50% cleavage rate and 10 % blastocyst rate). Additional studies may be necessary to further optimize electroporation parameters to achieve an optimal balance between embryo viability and gene editing efficiency. These outcomes will provide valuable insights for improving gene editing workflows for bovines and may help to promote and accelerate the widespread implementation of genome editing technology in livestock.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gene
Gene 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
718
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Gene publishes papers that focus on the regulation, expression, function and evolution of genes in all biological contexts, including all prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, as well as viruses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信