重新思考老年人抗胆碱能负担:检测和管理的创新方法。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Geofrey Oteng Phutietsile, Prasad S Nishtala
{"title":"重新思考老年人抗胆碱能负担:检测和管理的创新方法。","authors":"Geofrey Oteng Phutietsile, Prasad S Nishtala","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2546142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anticholinergic burden (AChB), the cumulative impact of medications with anticholinergic properties, is a modifiable risk factor linked to cognitive impairment, falls, and functional decline in older adults. Yet despite the availability of multiple AChB assessment tools, no consensus gold standard exists, and commonly used scales often rely on static, expert-derived drug rankings.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This narrative review synthesizes recent advances in AChB measurement and deprescribing. It critically evaluates established tools like the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale and Drug Burden Index (DBI), alongside emerging machine learning - based models such as the ML-AB scale. The review also explores the role of digital health innovations such as clinical decision support systems and wearable technologies in enhancing risk stratification and deprescribing interventions.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>While traditional tools remain useful, they suffer from limitations in adaptability and integration into routine workflows. Newer AI and data-driven approaches show promise in improving predictive accuracy and scalability. A paradigm shift is emerging, with future deprescribing efforts likely to depend on hybrid systems that combine mechanistic understanding with empirical robustness. For optimal impact, these tools must be validated, implemented thoughtfully, and aligned with patient-centered outcomes in diverse care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"551-562"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking anticholinergic burden in older adults: innovative approaches to detection and management.\",\"authors\":\"Geofrey Oteng Phutietsile, Prasad S Nishtala\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17512433.2025.2546142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anticholinergic burden (AChB), the cumulative impact of medications with anticholinergic properties, is a modifiable risk factor linked to cognitive impairment, falls, and functional decline in older adults. Yet despite the availability of multiple AChB assessment tools, no consensus gold standard exists, and commonly used scales often rely on static, expert-derived drug rankings.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This narrative review synthesizes recent advances in AChB measurement and deprescribing. It critically evaluates established tools like the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale and Drug Burden Index (DBI), alongside emerging machine learning - based models such as the ML-AB scale. The review also explores the role of digital health innovations such as clinical decision support systems and wearable technologies in enhancing risk stratification and deprescribing interventions.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>While traditional tools remain useful, they suffer from limitations in adaptability and integration into routine workflows. Newer AI and data-driven approaches show promise in improving predictive accuracy and scalability. A paradigm shift is emerging, with future deprescribing efforts likely to depend on hybrid systems that combine mechanistic understanding with empirical robustness. For optimal impact, these tools must be validated, implemented thoughtfully, and aligned with patient-centered outcomes in diverse care settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"551-562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2025.2546142\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2025.2546142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗胆碱能负荷(AChB)是具有抗胆碱能特性的药物的累积影响,是与老年人认知障碍、跌倒和功能下降相关的可改变的危险因素。然而,尽管有多种AChB评估工具,但没有共识的金标准存在,常用的量表往往依赖于静态的、专家衍生的药物排名。涵盖领域:这篇叙述性综述综合了AChB测量和处方的最新进展。它批判性地评估了抗胆碱能认知负担(ACB)量表和药物负担指数(DBI)等现有工具,以及ML-AB量表等新兴的基于机器学习的模型。该综述还探讨了诸如临床决策支持系统和可穿戴技术等数字健康创新在加强风险分层和减少干预措施方面的作用。专家意见:虽然传统工具仍然有用,但它们在适应性和集成到日常工作流程方面受到限制。新的人工智能和数据驱动的方法有望提高预测的准确性和可扩展性。一种范式的转变正在出现,未来的描述工作可能依赖于将机械理解与经验稳健性相结合的混合系统。为了获得最佳效果,这些工具必须经过验证,经过深思熟虑地实施,并在不同的护理环境中与以患者为中心的结果保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking anticholinergic burden in older adults: innovative approaches to detection and management.

Introduction: Anticholinergic burden (AChB), the cumulative impact of medications with anticholinergic properties, is a modifiable risk factor linked to cognitive impairment, falls, and functional decline in older adults. Yet despite the availability of multiple AChB assessment tools, no consensus gold standard exists, and commonly used scales often rely on static, expert-derived drug rankings.

Areas covered: This narrative review synthesizes recent advances in AChB measurement and deprescribing. It critically evaluates established tools like the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale and Drug Burden Index (DBI), alongside emerging machine learning - based models such as the ML-AB scale. The review also explores the role of digital health innovations such as clinical decision support systems and wearable technologies in enhancing risk stratification and deprescribing interventions.

Expert opinion: While traditional tools remain useful, they suffer from limitations in adaptability and integration into routine workflows. Newer AI and data-driven approaches show promise in improving predictive accuracy and scalability. A paradigm shift is emerging, with future deprescribing efforts likely to depend on hybrid systems that combine mechanistic understanding with empirical robustness. For optimal impact, these tools must be validated, implemented thoughtfully, and aligned with patient-centered outcomes in diverse care settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery. Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信