使用新型抗癫痫药物治疗癫痫:2013-2022年瑞典处方模式的回顾性队列研究

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-08-09 DOI:10.1111/epi.18576
Kristian Bolin, Patric Berling, Torbjörn Tomson
{"title":"使用新型抗癫痫药物治疗癫痫:2013-2022年瑞典处方模式的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Kristian Bolin, Patric Berling, Torbjörn Tomson","doi":"10.1111/epi.18576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the choice of newly introduced antiseizure medications (ASMs; brivaracetam, cannabidiol, cenobamate, fenfluramine, and perampanel) by age and sex, and the use of these ASMs in relation to regulatory approval.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified with dispensation of any ASM subsequent to at least one health care contact due to epilepsy (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision: G40) during 2000-2022. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for starting a newly introduced ASM, retention rates, number of ASM treatments preceding the first dispensation of a new ASM and concurrent ASM treatments at first dispensed new ASM, and share of patients using new ASMs as adjunctive treatment were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three percent of all patients identified with epilepsy treatment during the period 2013-2022 used at least one new ASM. IRRs for ever being dispensed a new ASM differed between age groups for all ASMs except cenobamate. The corresponding IRRs associated with sex were insignificantly different from 1, except for cannabidiol; men were more likely to start using cannabidiol. One-year retention rates were between 42% (cannabidiol, men) and 64% (brivaracetam, men). The majority (70%) of patients had used >2 ASMs prior to the first dispensation of a new ASM, and a majority (98%) of patients were treated with another ASM at first dispensation of a new ASM (≤90 days before). Similarly, 82% of the patients who started using a new ASM did so as an adjunctive treatment (ASMs dispensed ≤90 days before and ≥90 days after first new ASM).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Our observations indicate that prescription patterns of the newer ASMs comply with the currently approved indications for the respective medications for a majority of patients (prevalence of brivaracetam as adjunctive treatment is somewhat lower). Retention on the dispensed medications are in line with what would be expected for adjunctive treatment of patients with drug-resistant epilepsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of epilepsy using newer antiseizure medications: A retrospective cohort study of prescription patterns in Sweden 2013-2022.\",\"authors\":\"Kristian Bolin, Patric Berling, Torbjörn Tomson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the choice of newly introduced antiseizure medications (ASMs; brivaracetam, cannabidiol, cenobamate, fenfluramine, and perampanel) by age and sex, and the use of these ASMs in relation to regulatory approval.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified with dispensation of any ASM subsequent to at least one health care contact due to epilepsy (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision: G40) during 2000-2022. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for starting a newly introduced ASM, retention rates, number of ASM treatments preceding the first dispensation of a new ASM and concurrent ASM treatments at first dispensed new ASM, and share of patients using new ASMs as adjunctive treatment were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three percent of all patients identified with epilepsy treatment during the period 2013-2022 used at least one new ASM. IRRs for ever being dispensed a new ASM differed between age groups for all ASMs except cenobamate. The corresponding IRRs associated with sex were insignificantly different from 1, except for cannabidiol; men were more likely to start using cannabidiol. One-year retention rates were between 42% (cannabidiol, men) and 64% (brivaracetam, men). The majority (70%) of patients had used >2 ASMs prior to the first dispensation of a new ASM, and a majority (98%) of patients were treated with another ASM at first dispensation of a new ASM (≤90 days before). Similarly, 82% of the patients who started using a new ASM did so as an adjunctive treatment (ASMs dispensed ≤90 days before and ≥90 days after first new ASM).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Our observations indicate that prescription patterns of the newer ASMs comply with the currently approved indications for the respective medications for a majority of patients (prevalence of brivaracetam as adjunctive treatment is somewhat lower). Retention on the dispensed medications are in line with what would be expected for adjunctive treatment of patients with drug-resistant epilepsies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18576\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18576","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析新引入抗癫痫药物的选择;布瓦西坦、大麻二酚、辛奥巴酸、芬氟拉明和perampanel)的年龄和性别,以及这些ASMs的使用与监管批准的关系。方法:对2000-2022年期间因癫痫(国际疾病分类,第10版:G40)而至少有一次医疗接触后没有ASM的患者进行鉴定。计算新引入ASM的发生率比(IRRs)、保留率、首次分配新ASM之前的ASM治疗次数和首次分配新ASM时并发的ASM治疗次数,以及使用新ASM作为辅助治疗的患者比例。结果:在2013-2022年期间接受癫痫治疗的所有患者中,有3%至少使用了一种新的ASM。在所有的ASM中,IRRs总是被分配一个新的ASM,这在年龄组之间是不同的。除大麻二酚外,与性别相关的irs均为1,差异不显著;男性更有可能开始使用大麻二酚。一年的保留率在42%(大麻二酚,男性)和64%(布伐西坦,男性)之间。大多数(70%)患者在首次分配新ASM之前使用过bbbb2 ASM,大多数(98%)患者在首次分配新ASM时(≤90天前)接受过另一ASM治疗。同样,82%开始使用新ASM的患者将其作为辅助治疗(ASM在首次新ASM前≤90天和后≥90天分配)。意义:我们的观察表明,新asm的处方模式符合目前批准的大多数患者各自药物的适应症(布瓦西坦作为辅助治疗的患病率略低)。配发药物的保留符合对耐药癫痫患者辅助治疗的预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment of epilepsy using newer antiseizure medications: A retrospective cohort study of prescription patterns in Sweden 2013-2022.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the choice of newly introduced antiseizure medications (ASMs; brivaracetam, cannabidiol, cenobamate, fenfluramine, and perampanel) by age and sex, and the use of these ASMs in relation to regulatory approval.

Methods: Patients were identified with dispensation of any ASM subsequent to at least one health care contact due to epilepsy (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision: G40) during 2000-2022. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for starting a newly introduced ASM, retention rates, number of ASM treatments preceding the first dispensation of a new ASM and concurrent ASM treatments at first dispensed new ASM, and share of patients using new ASMs as adjunctive treatment were calculated.

Results: Three percent of all patients identified with epilepsy treatment during the period 2013-2022 used at least one new ASM. IRRs for ever being dispensed a new ASM differed between age groups for all ASMs except cenobamate. The corresponding IRRs associated with sex were insignificantly different from 1, except for cannabidiol; men were more likely to start using cannabidiol. One-year retention rates were between 42% (cannabidiol, men) and 64% (brivaracetam, men). The majority (70%) of patients had used >2 ASMs prior to the first dispensation of a new ASM, and a majority (98%) of patients were treated with another ASM at first dispensation of a new ASM (≤90 days before). Similarly, 82% of the patients who started using a new ASM did so as an adjunctive treatment (ASMs dispensed ≤90 days before and ≥90 days after first new ASM).

Significance: Our observations indicate that prescription patterns of the newer ASMs comply with the currently approved indications for the respective medications for a majority of patients (prevalence of brivaracetam as adjunctive treatment is somewhat lower). Retention on the dispensed medications are in line with what would be expected for adjunctive treatment of patients with drug-resistant epilepsies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信