{"title":"使用新型抗癫痫药物治疗癫痫:2013-2022年瑞典处方模式的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Kristian Bolin, Patric Berling, Torbjörn Tomson","doi":"10.1111/epi.18576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the choice of newly introduced antiseizure medications (ASMs; brivaracetam, cannabidiol, cenobamate, fenfluramine, and perampanel) by age and sex, and the use of these ASMs in relation to regulatory approval.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified with dispensation of any ASM subsequent to at least one health care contact due to epilepsy (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision: G40) during 2000-2022. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for starting a newly introduced ASM, retention rates, number of ASM treatments preceding the first dispensation of a new ASM and concurrent ASM treatments at first dispensed new ASM, and share of patients using new ASMs as adjunctive treatment were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three percent of all patients identified with epilepsy treatment during the period 2013-2022 used at least one new ASM. IRRs for ever being dispensed a new ASM differed between age groups for all ASMs except cenobamate. The corresponding IRRs associated with sex were insignificantly different from 1, except for cannabidiol; men were more likely to start using cannabidiol. One-year retention rates were between 42% (cannabidiol, men) and 64% (brivaracetam, men). The majority (70%) of patients had used >2 ASMs prior to the first dispensation of a new ASM, and a majority (98%) of patients were treated with another ASM at first dispensation of a new ASM (≤90 days before). Similarly, 82% of the patients who started using a new ASM did so as an adjunctive treatment (ASMs dispensed ≤90 days before and ≥90 days after first new ASM).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Our observations indicate that prescription patterns of the newer ASMs comply with the currently approved indications for the respective medications for a majority of patients (prevalence of brivaracetam as adjunctive treatment is somewhat lower). Retention on the dispensed medications are in line with what would be expected for adjunctive treatment of patients with drug-resistant epilepsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of epilepsy using newer antiseizure medications: A retrospective cohort study of prescription patterns in Sweden 2013-2022.\",\"authors\":\"Kristian Bolin, Patric Berling, Torbjörn Tomson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the choice of newly introduced antiseizure medications (ASMs; brivaracetam, cannabidiol, cenobamate, fenfluramine, and perampanel) by age and sex, and the use of these ASMs in relation to regulatory approval.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified with dispensation of any ASM subsequent to at least one health care contact due to epilepsy (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision: G40) during 2000-2022. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for starting a newly introduced ASM, retention rates, number of ASM treatments preceding the first dispensation of a new ASM and concurrent ASM treatments at first dispensed new ASM, and share of patients using new ASMs as adjunctive treatment were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three percent of all patients identified with epilepsy treatment during the period 2013-2022 used at least one new ASM. IRRs for ever being dispensed a new ASM differed between age groups for all ASMs except cenobamate. The corresponding IRRs associated with sex were insignificantly different from 1, except for cannabidiol; men were more likely to start using cannabidiol. One-year retention rates were between 42% (cannabidiol, men) and 64% (brivaracetam, men). The majority (70%) of patients had used >2 ASMs prior to the first dispensation of a new ASM, and a majority (98%) of patients were treated with another ASM at first dispensation of a new ASM (≤90 days before). Similarly, 82% of the patients who started using a new ASM did so as an adjunctive treatment (ASMs dispensed ≤90 days before and ≥90 days after first new ASM).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Our observations indicate that prescription patterns of the newer ASMs comply with the currently approved indications for the respective medications for a majority of patients (prevalence of brivaracetam as adjunctive treatment is somewhat lower). Retention on the dispensed medications are in line with what would be expected for adjunctive treatment of patients with drug-resistant epilepsies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18576\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18576","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Treatment of epilepsy using newer antiseizure medications: A retrospective cohort study of prescription patterns in Sweden 2013-2022.
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the choice of newly introduced antiseizure medications (ASMs; brivaracetam, cannabidiol, cenobamate, fenfluramine, and perampanel) by age and sex, and the use of these ASMs in relation to regulatory approval.
Methods: Patients were identified with dispensation of any ASM subsequent to at least one health care contact due to epilepsy (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision: G40) during 2000-2022. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for starting a newly introduced ASM, retention rates, number of ASM treatments preceding the first dispensation of a new ASM and concurrent ASM treatments at first dispensed new ASM, and share of patients using new ASMs as adjunctive treatment were calculated.
Results: Three percent of all patients identified with epilepsy treatment during the period 2013-2022 used at least one new ASM. IRRs for ever being dispensed a new ASM differed between age groups for all ASMs except cenobamate. The corresponding IRRs associated with sex were insignificantly different from 1, except for cannabidiol; men were more likely to start using cannabidiol. One-year retention rates were between 42% (cannabidiol, men) and 64% (brivaracetam, men). The majority (70%) of patients had used >2 ASMs prior to the first dispensation of a new ASM, and a majority (98%) of patients were treated with another ASM at first dispensation of a new ASM (≤90 days before). Similarly, 82% of the patients who started using a new ASM did so as an adjunctive treatment (ASMs dispensed ≤90 days before and ≥90 days after first new ASM).
Significance: Our observations indicate that prescription patterns of the newer ASMs comply with the currently approved indications for the respective medications for a majority of patients (prevalence of brivaracetam as adjunctive treatment is somewhat lower). Retention on the dispensed medications are in line with what would be expected for adjunctive treatment of patients with drug-resistant epilepsies.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.