家庭录像在鉴别睡眠相关性运动性癫痫与觉醒障碍中的可靠性和诊断准确性。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-08-09 DOI:10.1111/epi.18561
Laura Licchetta, Greta Mainieri, Giuseppe Loddo, Flavia Baccari, Giulia Bruschi, Lisa Taruffi, Lino Nobili, Paolo Tinuper, Luca Vignatelli, Federica Provini, Francesca Bisulli
{"title":"家庭录像在鉴别睡眠相关性运动性癫痫与觉醒障碍中的可靠性和诊断准确性。","authors":"Laura Licchetta, Greta Mainieri, Giuseppe Loddo, Flavia Baccari, Giulia Bruschi, Lisa Taruffi, Lino Nobili, Paolo Tinuper, Luca Vignatelli, Federica Provini, Francesca Bisulli","doi":"10.1111/epi.18561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the interobserver reliability (IR) and diagnostic accuracy of home video in distinguishing sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy (SHE) from disorders of arousal (DoA) among neurologists with varying levels of expertise. Additionally, it assesses the learning effect in nonexpert raters and extrapolates key diagnostic elements and confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected 24 home videos capturing sleep-related events recognized as typical from 12 patients with confirmed SHE and 12 with DoA. During a full-day video session, a panel of 18 experts in epileptology or in sleep medicine and 12 general neurologists and residents were asked to classify each video as \"SHE,\" \"DoA,\" or \"unknown,\" based on the semiology of the event. Baseline IR among all raters and among neurologists before and after experts' discussion was calculated using kappa statistics. The learning effect for nonexperts was assessed using McNemar test by comparing performance before and after training. A thematic analysis of raters' comments was conducted to extrapolate discriminatory features for diagnosis and to identify confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall agreement was 75%, with a \"moderate\" IR (kappa = .56). Raw agreement among experts was 79%, with \"substantial\" IR (kappa = .62). Among general neurologists, raw agreement improved from 70% to 82% after training, corresponding to \"moderate\" IR (kappa = .47) and \"substantial\" IR (kappa = .65), respectively. Disagreement was higher for DoA cases. The thematic analysis identified abrupt onset and brief duration of episodes, ambulatory behavior, and irregular breathing as the main confounders.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Home video is a reliable tool for distinguishing between SHE and DoA. IR is substantial when assessed by experts and among nonexperts after appropriate educational training. The use of home video as a diagnostic tool is feasible for clinicians with limited access to specialized diagnostic facilities, as well as for sleep and epilepsy specialists, aiding in the diagnostic process and in the follow-up assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of home video recording in differentiating sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy from disorders of arousal.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Licchetta, Greta Mainieri, Giuseppe Loddo, Flavia Baccari, Giulia Bruschi, Lisa Taruffi, Lino Nobili, Paolo Tinuper, Luca Vignatelli, Federica Provini, Francesca Bisulli\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the interobserver reliability (IR) and diagnostic accuracy of home video in distinguishing sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy (SHE) from disorders of arousal (DoA) among neurologists with varying levels of expertise. Additionally, it assesses the learning effect in nonexpert raters and extrapolates key diagnostic elements and confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected 24 home videos capturing sleep-related events recognized as typical from 12 patients with confirmed SHE and 12 with DoA. During a full-day video session, a panel of 18 experts in epileptology or in sleep medicine and 12 general neurologists and residents were asked to classify each video as \\\"SHE,\\\" \\\"DoA,\\\" or \\\"unknown,\\\" based on the semiology of the event. Baseline IR among all raters and among neurologists before and after experts' discussion was calculated using kappa statistics. The learning effect for nonexperts was assessed using McNemar test by comparing performance before and after training. A thematic analysis of raters' comments was conducted to extrapolate discriminatory features for diagnosis and to identify confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall agreement was 75%, with a \\\"moderate\\\" IR (kappa = .56). Raw agreement among experts was 79%, with \\\"substantial\\\" IR (kappa = .62). Among general neurologists, raw agreement improved from 70% to 82% after training, corresponding to \\\"moderate\\\" IR (kappa = .47) and \\\"substantial\\\" IR (kappa = .65), respectively. Disagreement was higher for DoA cases. The thematic analysis identified abrupt onset and brief duration of episodes, ambulatory behavior, and irregular breathing as the main confounders.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Home video is a reliable tool for distinguishing between SHE and DoA. IR is substantial when assessed by experts and among nonexperts after appropriate educational training. The use of home video as a diagnostic tool is feasible for clinicians with limited access to specialized diagnostic facilities, as well as for sleep and epilepsy specialists, aiding in the diagnostic process and in the follow-up assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18561\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18561","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究在不同专业水平的神经科医生中评估家庭录像在区分睡眠相关性运动性癫痫(SHE)和觉醒障碍(DoA)方面的观察者间信度(IR)和诊断准确性。此外,它还评估了非专家评分者的学习效果,并推断出关键的诊断因素和混杂因素。方法:从12例确诊SHE患者和12例DoA患者中选取24段典型睡眠相关事件的家庭录像。在一整天的视频会议中,由18名癫痫学或睡眠医学专家以及12名普通神经科医生和住院医生组成的小组被要求根据事件的符号学将每个视频分类为“SHE”,“DoA”或“未知”。使用kappa统计计算专家讨论前后所有评分者和神经科医生的基线IR。采用McNemar测试,比较训练前后的表现,评估非专家的学习效果。对评分者的评论进行了专题分析,以推断诊断的歧视性特征并确定混淆因素。结果:总体一致性为75%,IR为“中等”(kappa = .56)。专家之间的原始一致性为79%,具有“实质性”IR (kappa = .62)。在全科神经科医生中,训练后的原始一致性从70%提高到82%,分别对应于“中度”IR (kappa = 0.47)和“实质性”IR (kappa = 0.65)。在死亡案例中,分歧更大。主题分析确定突发和短时间发作、走动行为和不规则呼吸是主要混杂因素。意义:家用视频是区分SHE和DoA的可靠工具。在经过适当的教育培训后,由专家和非专家进行评估时,IR是实质性的。使用家庭录像作为诊断工具,对于使用专业诊断设施有限的临床医生以及睡眠和癫痫专家来说是可行的,有助于诊断过程和后续评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of home video recording in differentiating sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy from disorders of arousal.

Objective: This study evaluates the interobserver reliability (IR) and diagnostic accuracy of home video in distinguishing sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy (SHE) from disorders of arousal (DoA) among neurologists with varying levels of expertise. Additionally, it assesses the learning effect in nonexpert raters and extrapolates key diagnostic elements and confounding factors.

Methods: We selected 24 home videos capturing sleep-related events recognized as typical from 12 patients with confirmed SHE and 12 with DoA. During a full-day video session, a panel of 18 experts in epileptology or in sleep medicine and 12 general neurologists and residents were asked to classify each video as "SHE," "DoA," or "unknown," based on the semiology of the event. Baseline IR among all raters and among neurologists before and after experts' discussion was calculated using kappa statistics. The learning effect for nonexperts was assessed using McNemar test by comparing performance before and after training. A thematic analysis of raters' comments was conducted to extrapolate discriminatory features for diagnosis and to identify confounding factors.

Results: The overall agreement was 75%, with a "moderate" IR (kappa = .56). Raw agreement among experts was 79%, with "substantial" IR (kappa = .62). Among general neurologists, raw agreement improved from 70% to 82% after training, corresponding to "moderate" IR (kappa = .47) and "substantial" IR (kappa = .65), respectively. Disagreement was higher for DoA cases. The thematic analysis identified abrupt onset and brief duration of episodes, ambulatory behavior, and irregular breathing as the main confounders.

Significance: Home video is a reliable tool for distinguishing between SHE and DoA. IR is substantial when assessed by experts and among nonexperts after appropriate educational training. The use of home video as a diagnostic tool is feasible for clinicians with limited access to specialized diagnostic facilities, as well as for sleep and epilepsy specialists, aiding in the diagnostic process and in the follow-up assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信