网络无性恋群体中的亲密关系和身份协商:超越规范假设。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Gabriele Caruso, Elvira Celardi
{"title":"网络无性恋群体中的亲密关系和身份协商:超越规范假设。","authors":"Gabriele Caruso, Elvira Celardi","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2025.2542842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study highlights the crucial role of asexual communities in challenging traditional conceptualisations of intimacy, which have historically viewed physical closeness and sexual attraction as inherently linked. Specifically, the analysis focuses on how AVEN (Asexual Visibility and Education Network) members experience physical closeness, also examining the intersection of asexuality and kinks. Through a sentiment analysis conducted on 3,436 comments posted on the AVEN online community, undertaken using Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools, recurring themes and predominant emotions expressed by users were identified. The findings, enriched by data from 16 AVEN members semi-structured online interviews, emphasise the individualised nature of intimacy preferences among members of the asexual community, where physical closeness often serves as an emotional rather than sexual medium. The results challenge conventional intimacy frameworks, advocating for a more inclusive and nuanced understanding of human connections, supporting the development of a more liveable environment for asexual individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":10799,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intimacy and identity negotiation in online asexual communities: beyond normative assumptions.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Caruso, Elvira Celardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13691058.2025.2542842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study highlights the crucial role of asexual communities in challenging traditional conceptualisations of intimacy, which have historically viewed physical closeness and sexual attraction as inherently linked. Specifically, the analysis focuses on how AVEN (Asexual Visibility and Education Network) members experience physical closeness, also examining the intersection of asexuality and kinks. Through a sentiment analysis conducted on 3,436 comments posted on the AVEN online community, undertaken using Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools, recurring themes and predominant emotions expressed by users were identified. The findings, enriched by data from 16 AVEN members semi-structured online interviews, emphasise the individualised nature of intimacy preferences among members of the asexual community, where physical closeness often serves as an emotional rather than sexual medium. The results challenge conventional intimacy frameworks, advocating for a more inclusive and nuanced understanding of human connections, supporting the development of a more liveable environment for asexual individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture, Health & Sexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture, Health & Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2025.2542842\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2025.2542842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究强调了无性群体在挑战传统的亲密概念方面的关键作用,传统的亲密概念历来认为身体亲密和性吸引是内在联系的。具体来说,分析集中在AVEN(无性恋可见性和教育网络)成员如何体验身体亲密,也检查了无性恋和扭结的交集。通过使用自然语言处理(NLP)工具对AVEN在线社区上发布的3,436条评论进行情绪分析,确定了用户表达的重复主题和主要情绪。从16位AVEN成员的半结构化在线访谈中获得的数据丰富了这些发现,强调了无性恋群体成员亲密偏好的个体化本质,在无性恋群体中,身体亲密往往是一种情感媒介,而不是性媒介。研究结果挑战了传统的亲密关系框架,倡导对人际关系进行更包容、更细致的理解,支持为无性恋者创造更宜居的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intimacy and identity negotiation in online asexual communities: beyond normative assumptions.

The study highlights the crucial role of asexual communities in challenging traditional conceptualisations of intimacy, which have historically viewed physical closeness and sexual attraction as inherently linked. Specifically, the analysis focuses on how AVEN (Asexual Visibility and Education Network) members experience physical closeness, also examining the intersection of asexuality and kinks. Through a sentiment analysis conducted on 3,436 comments posted on the AVEN online community, undertaken using Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools, recurring themes and predominant emotions expressed by users were identified. The findings, enriched by data from 16 AVEN members semi-structured online interviews, emphasise the individualised nature of intimacy preferences among members of the asexual community, where physical closeness often serves as an emotional rather than sexual medium. The results challenge conventional intimacy frameworks, advocating for a more inclusive and nuanced understanding of human connections, supporting the development of a more liveable environment for asexual individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信