由非医师提供者和医师提供的急诊护理趋势:2009-2021。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Summer Ghaith, Cameron Gettel, Megan McElhinny, Aidan F Mullan, Molly M Jeffery, Rachel A Lindor
{"title":"由非医师提供者和医师提供的急诊护理趋势:2009-2021。","authors":"Summer Ghaith, Cameron Gettel, Megan McElhinny, Aidan F Mullan, Molly M Jeffery, Rachel A Lindor","doi":"10.1111/acem.70098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We describe the types of emergency department (ED) visits managed by non-physician providers (NPPs), including physician assistants and nurse practitioners, and emergency medicine (EM) physicians, assessing shifts in care patterns over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey collected from 2009 to 2021. We classified visits by provider type: physician only, physician with resident, physician with NPP, and NPP only. We described characteristics of visits by provider type, including patient demographics, triage urgency, imaging, length of stay, and disposition, and analyzed using Poisson regression. We described the change in type of provider seen over this study period and further analyzed by triage urgency and hospital location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1.684 billion estimated ED visits from 2009 to 2021, 1.171 billion were managed by physicians without residents or NPPs (physicians only), 136.3 million by physicians with residents, 209.1 million by physicians with NPPs, and 167.4 million by NPPs only. Patients seen by physicians only were older, were triaged as having more urgent needs, had a longer ED length of stay, and were more likely to be admitted compared to those seen by NPPs only. Physician-only visits decreased from 77% to 62%, while NPP-only visits increased from 6% to 11%. The physician with the NPP group similarly grew from 9% to 17%. For visits assigned a triage urgency level of 2 (\"emergent\"), physician-only visits decreased by 20%, physician with NPP visits increased by 13%, and NPP-only visits increased by 3%. In metropolitan areas, physician-only visits dropped 14%, with a 5% increase in NPP-only visits. In non-metropolitan areas, physician-only visits decreased 17%, with a 9% increase in NPP-only visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EM workforce has shifted, with NPPs seeing a higher percentage of patients, including both lower- and higher-acuity patients. This shift is particularly prominent in rural areas but is evident across all regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Emergency Care Provided by Non-Physician Providers and Physicians: 2009-2021.\",\"authors\":\"Summer Ghaith, Cameron Gettel, Megan McElhinny, Aidan F Mullan, Molly M Jeffery, Rachel A Lindor\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acem.70098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We describe the types of emergency department (ED) visits managed by non-physician providers (NPPs), including physician assistants and nurse practitioners, and emergency medicine (EM) physicians, assessing shifts in care patterns over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey collected from 2009 to 2021. We classified visits by provider type: physician only, physician with resident, physician with NPP, and NPP only. We described characteristics of visits by provider type, including patient demographics, triage urgency, imaging, length of stay, and disposition, and analyzed using Poisson regression. We described the change in type of provider seen over this study period and further analyzed by triage urgency and hospital location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1.684 billion estimated ED visits from 2009 to 2021, 1.171 billion were managed by physicians without residents or NPPs (physicians only), 136.3 million by physicians with residents, 209.1 million by physicians with NPPs, and 167.4 million by NPPs only. Patients seen by physicians only were older, were triaged as having more urgent needs, had a longer ED length of stay, and were more likely to be admitted compared to those seen by NPPs only. Physician-only visits decreased from 77% to 62%, while NPP-only visits increased from 6% to 11%. The physician with the NPP group similarly grew from 9% to 17%. For visits assigned a triage urgency level of 2 (\\\"emergent\\\"), physician-only visits decreased by 20%, physician with NPP visits increased by 13%, and NPP-only visits increased by 3%. In metropolitan areas, physician-only visits dropped 14%, with a 5% increase in NPP-only visits. In non-metropolitan areas, physician-only visits decreased 17%, with a 9% increase in NPP-only visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EM workforce has shifted, with NPPs seeing a higher percentage of patients, including both lower- and higher-acuity patients. This shift is particularly prominent in rural areas but is evident across all regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70098\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们描述了由非医师提供者(NPPs)管理的急诊科(ED)访问的类型,包括医师助理和执业护士,以及急诊医学(EM)医生,评估了随着时间的推移护理模式的变化。方法:采用2009 - 2021年全国医院门诊医疗调查数据。我们根据提供者类型对就诊进行分类:只有医生、有住院医师的医生、有NPP的医生和只有NPP的医生。我们根据提供者类型描述了就诊特征,包括患者人口统计学、分诊紧迫性、影像学、住院时间和处置,并使用泊松回归进行了分析。我们描述了在本研究期间看到的提供者类型的变化,并进一步分析了分诊紧迫性和医院位置。结果:在2009年至2021年的16.84亿人次急诊就诊中,11.71亿人次由无住院医师或非住院医师管理,1.363亿人次由有住院医师管理,2.091亿人次由有住院医师管理,1.674亿人次由非住院医师管理。仅由医生就诊的患者年龄较大,被分类为有更紧急的需求,在急诊科的住院时间较长,与仅由NPPs就诊的患者相比,更有可能入院。只看医生的人数从77%下降到62%,而只看npp的人数从6%上升到11%。NPP组的医生比例同样从9%上升到17%。对于分诊紧急程度为2(“紧急”)的就诊,只看医生的就诊减少了20%,看NPP医生的就诊增加了13%,看NPP医生的就诊增加了3%。在大都市地区,只看医生的人数下降了14%,只看npp的人数增加了5%。在非大都市地区,只看医生的人数减少了17%,而只看npp的人数增加了9%。结论:EM的工作人员已经发生了变化,NPPs看到的患者比例更高,包括低视力和高视力的患者。这种转变在农村地区尤为突出,但在所有地区都很明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in Emergency Care Provided by Non-Physician Providers and Physicians: 2009-2021.

Objectives: We describe the types of emergency department (ED) visits managed by non-physician providers (NPPs), including physician assistants and nurse practitioners, and emergency medicine (EM) physicians, assessing shifts in care patterns over time.

Methods: We used data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey collected from 2009 to 2021. We classified visits by provider type: physician only, physician with resident, physician with NPP, and NPP only. We described characteristics of visits by provider type, including patient demographics, triage urgency, imaging, length of stay, and disposition, and analyzed using Poisson regression. We described the change in type of provider seen over this study period and further analyzed by triage urgency and hospital location.

Results: Of 1.684 billion estimated ED visits from 2009 to 2021, 1.171 billion were managed by physicians without residents or NPPs (physicians only), 136.3 million by physicians with residents, 209.1 million by physicians with NPPs, and 167.4 million by NPPs only. Patients seen by physicians only were older, were triaged as having more urgent needs, had a longer ED length of stay, and were more likely to be admitted compared to those seen by NPPs only. Physician-only visits decreased from 77% to 62%, while NPP-only visits increased from 6% to 11%. The physician with the NPP group similarly grew from 9% to 17%. For visits assigned a triage urgency level of 2 ("emergent"), physician-only visits decreased by 20%, physician with NPP visits increased by 13%, and NPP-only visits increased by 3%. In metropolitan areas, physician-only visits dropped 14%, with a 5% increase in NPP-only visits. In non-metropolitan areas, physician-only visits decreased 17%, with a 9% increase in NPP-only visits.

Conclusions: The EM workforce has shifted, with NPPs seeing a higher percentage of patients, including both lower- and higher-acuity patients. This shift is particularly prominent in rural areas but is evident across all regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信