Hicham Mahdjoub–Araibi, Mourad Zouaoui–Rabah, Madani Hedidi, Abdelkader M. Elhorri, Assia Laib, Mohammed Zenati
{"title":"具有扩展共轭桥的推挽分子的DFT和TD-DFT研究:有机金属环增强非线性光学(NLO)性质的理论见解。","authors":"Hicham Mahdjoub–Araibi, Mourad Zouaoui–Rabah, Madani Hedidi, Abdelkader M. Elhorri, Assia Laib, Mohammed Zenati","doi":"10.1007/s00894-025-06445-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>This work presents a theoretical investigation of nine push–pull molecules featuring conjugated bridges composed of three distinct organometallic rings: Titanol, Chromol, Ferrol, Nickelol, and Zinkol. These bridges are connected at their ends to acceptor (NO₂) and donor (N(CH₃)₂) groups positioned on the α-sites of the aforementioned rings. In systems incorporating cyclic groups, it was found that placing Titanol and Nickelol rings between two Zinkol units enhances the nonlinear optical (NLO) response. A similar enhancement is observed when Chromol and Ferrol rings are positioned at the termini of the Zinkol units. Frontier orbital analysis reveals that the Zinkol rings exhibit electron-accepting characteristics, whereas the other rings act as electron donors. The two molecular systems conform to the architectures D–A–D–A–A (Titanol–Nichelol–Zinkol) and D–D–A–A–A (Chromol–Ferrol–Zinkol), respectively. Computed static β_tot values range from 142.71 to 512.07 × 10<sup>–30</sup> esu, while static |γav| values fall within 1.88 to 245.05 × 10⁻<sup>35</sup> esu. The study also includes an analysis of dynamic <span>\\({\\beta }_{||}^{\\lambda }(-2\\omega ;\\omega ,\\omega )\\)</span> values, which lie between 2478.43 and 1,036,410.00 × 10<sup>–30</sup> esu, and dynamic <span>\\({\\gamma }_{||}^{\\lambda }(-2\\omega ;\\omega ,\\omega ,0)\\)</span> values ranging from 26,017.87 to 193,013,000 × 10⁻<sup>35</sup> esu. Nonlinear refractive indices (n₂) were also evaluated, with values spanning from 5.11 × 10⁻<sup>15</sup> cm<sup>2</sup>·W⁻<sup>1</sup> to 2.91 × 10⁻<sup>1</sup>⁰ cm<sup>2</sup>·W⁻<sup>1</sup>. Additionally, most of the investigated molecules exhibit absorption within the 450–900 nm range, both in vacuum and in various solvents.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>All calculations were performed using Gaussian 16 program. The methods used are DFT and TD–DFT.Several functionals were treated: CAM–B3LYP, LC–ωPBE, LC–BLYP, M11, ωB97X, M08HX, M062X, MN12SX, MN15, M06HF.Several basis–sets was studied:6–31G(d,p), 6–31 + + G(d,p), cc–pVDZ, AUG–cc–pVDZ, 6–311G(d,p), 6–311 + + G(d,p), cc–pVTZ, AUG–cc–pVTZ and LanL2DZ. Implicit Solvation Model used are CPCM and SMD. Finally, NBO method is used also.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","volume":"31 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DFT and TD–DFT study of push–pull molecules with extended conjugated bridges: theoretical insight into organometallic rings for the enhanced Nonlinear Optical (NLO) properties\",\"authors\":\"Hicham Mahdjoub–Araibi, Mourad Zouaoui–Rabah, Madani Hedidi, Abdelkader M. Elhorri, Assia Laib, Mohammed Zenati\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00894-025-06445-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>This work presents a theoretical investigation of nine push–pull molecules featuring conjugated bridges composed of three distinct organometallic rings: Titanol, Chromol, Ferrol, Nickelol, and Zinkol. These bridges are connected at their ends to acceptor (NO₂) and donor (N(CH₃)₂) groups positioned on the α-sites of the aforementioned rings. In systems incorporating cyclic groups, it was found that placing Titanol and Nickelol rings between two Zinkol units enhances the nonlinear optical (NLO) response. A similar enhancement is observed when Chromol and Ferrol rings are positioned at the termini of the Zinkol units. Frontier orbital analysis reveals that the Zinkol rings exhibit electron-accepting characteristics, whereas the other rings act as electron donors. The two molecular systems conform to the architectures D–A–D–A–A (Titanol–Nichelol–Zinkol) and D–D–A–A–A (Chromol–Ferrol–Zinkol), respectively. Computed static β_tot values range from 142.71 to 512.07 × 10<sup>–30</sup> esu, while static |γav| values fall within 1.88 to 245.05 × 10⁻<sup>35</sup> esu. The study also includes an analysis of dynamic <span>\\\\({\\\\beta }_{||}^{\\\\lambda }(-2\\\\omega ;\\\\omega ,\\\\omega )\\\\)</span> values, which lie between 2478.43 and 1,036,410.00 × 10<sup>–30</sup> esu, and dynamic <span>\\\\({\\\\gamma }_{||}^{\\\\lambda }(-2\\\\omega ;\\\\omega ,\\\\omega ,0)\\\\)</span> values ranging from 26,017.87 to 193,013,000 × 10⁻<sup>35</sup> esu. Nonlinear refractive indices (n₂) were also evaluated, with values spanning from 5.11 × 10⁻<sup>15</sup> cm<sup>2</sup>·W⁻<sup>1</sup> to 2.91 × 10⁻<sup>1</sup>⁰ cm<sup>2</sup>·W⁻<sup>1</sup>. Additionally, most of the investigated molecules exhibit absorption within the 450–900 nm range, both in vacuum and in various solvents.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>All calculations were performed using Gaussian 16 program. The methods used are DFT and TD–DFT.Several functionals were treated: CAM–B3LYP, LC–ωPBE, LC–BLYP, M11, ωB97X, M08HX, M062X, MN12SX, MN15, M06HF.Several basis–sets was studied:6–31G(d,p), 6–31 + + G(d,p), cc–pVDZ, AUG–cc–pVDZ, 6–311G(d,p), 6–311 + + G(d,p), cc–pVTZ, AUG–cc–pVTZ and LanL2DZ. Implicit Solvation Model used are CPCM and SMD. Finally, NBO method is used also.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Modeling\",\"volume\":\"31 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Modeling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00894-025-06445-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00894-025-06445-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
DFT and TD–DFT study of push–pull molecules with extended conjugated bridges: theoretical insight into organometallic rings for the enhanced Nonlinear Optical (NLO) properties
Context
This work presents a theoretical investigation of nine push–pull molecules featuring conjugated bridges composed of three distinct organometallic rings: Titanol, Chromol, Ferrol, Nickelol, and Zinkol. These bridges are connected at their ends to acceptor (NO₂) and donor (N(CH₃)₂) groups positioned on the α-sites of the aforementioned rings. In systems incorporating cyclic groups, it was found that placing Titanol and Nickelol rings between two Zinkol units enhances the nonlinear optical (NLO) response. A similar enhancement is observed when Chromol and Ferrol rings are positioned at the termini of the Zinkol units. Frontier orbital analysis reveals that the Zinkol rings exhibit electron-accepting characteristics, whereas the other rings act as electron donors. The two molecular systems conform to the architectures D–A–D–A–A (Titanol–Nichelol–Zinkol) and D–D–A–A–A (Chromol–Ferrol–Zinkol), respectively. Computed static β_tot values range from 142.71 to 512.07 × 10–30 esu, while static |γav| values fall within 1.88 to 245.05 × 10⁻35 esu. The study also includes an analysis of dynamic \({\beta }_{||}^{\lambda }(-2\omega ;\omega ,\omega )\) values, which lie between 2478.43 and 1,036,410.00 × 10–30 esu, and dynamic \({\gamma }_{||}^{\lambda }(-2\omega ;\omega ,\omega ,0)\) values ranging from 26,017.87 to 193,013,000 × 10⁻35 esu. Nonlinear refractive indices (n₂) were also evaluated, with values spanning from 5.11 × 10⁻15 cm2·W⁻1 to 2.91 × 10⁻1⁰ cm2·W⁻1. Additionally, most of the investigated molecules exhibit absorption within the 450–900 nm range, both in vacuum and in various solvents.
Method
All calculations were performed using Gaussian 16 program. The methods used are DFT and TD–DFT.Several functionals were treated: CAM–B3LYP, LC–ωPBE, LC–BLYP, M11, ωB97X, M08HX, M062X, MN12SX, MN15, M06HF.Several basis–sets was studied:6–31G(d,p), 6–31 + + G(d,p), cc–pVDZ, AUG–cc–pVDZ, 6–311G(d,p), 6–311 + + G(d,p), cc–pVTZ, AUG–cc–pVTZ and LanL2DZ. Implicit Solvation Model used are CPCM and SMD. Finally, NBO method is used also.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Molecular Modeling focuses on "hardcore" modeling, publishing high-quality research and reports. Founded in 1995 as a purely electronic journal, it has adapted its format to include a full-color print edition, and adjusted its aims and scope fit the fast-changing field of molecular modeling, with a particular focus on three-dimensional modeling.
Today, the journal covers all aspects of molecular modeling including life science modeling; materials modeling; new methods; and computational chemistry.
Topics include computer-aided molecular design; rational drug design, de novo ligand design, receptor modeling and docking; cheminformatics, data analysis, visualization and mining; computational medicinal chemistry; homology modeling; simulation of peptides, DNA and other biopolymers; quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) and ADME-modeling; modeling of biological reaction mechanisms; and combined experimental and computational studies in which calculations play a major role.