Mohammed Nor, Olayiwola Bolaji, Ali Bilal, Mohamed S Mahmoud, Abdirahman Wardhere, Jarrett Kelley, Chafik Assal
{"title":"导管消融治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低心房颤动患者的长期疗效。","authors":"Mohammed Nor, Olayiwola Bolaji, Ali Bilal, Mohamed S Mahmoud, Abdirahman Wardhere, Jarrett Kelley, Chafik Assal","doi":"10.1111/pace.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an effective treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), its impact on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with concomitant heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of CA versus conventional therapy in patients with HFrEF and AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (January 2014-December 2024) with a 3-year follow-up period. Patients aged ≥18 years with HFrEF (EF < 40%) and AF were categorized into two cohorts: those received CA versus conventional therapy. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, recurrent AF, and heart failure (HF) hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 64,743 patients remained in each cohort. The mean age was 73.4 ± 11.4 years in the CA cohort and 73.5 ± 11.5 years in the control cohort (p = 0.109). CA was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.43-0.49, p < 0.001), all-cause hospitalization (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.95, p < 0.001) and recurrent AF (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.79-0.82, p < 0.001) but higher HF hospitalization (HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.06-1.08, p < 0.001) compared to conventional therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that in patients with AF and HFrEF, CA was associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and AF recurrence, but an increased risk of HF hospitalization compared to conventional therapy. These findings suggest that CA may provide substantial long-term benefits in this high-risk population, while highlighting the importance of careful patient selection and post-procedural management.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"1037-1046"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Nor, Olayiwola Bolaji, Ali Bilal, Mohamed S Mahmoud, Abdirahman Wardhere, Jarrett Kelley, Chafik Assal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an effective treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), its impact on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with concomitant heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of CA versus conventional therapy in patients with HFrEF and AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (January 2014-December 2024) with a 3-year follow-up period. Patients aged ≥18 years with HFrEF (EF < 40%) and AF were categorized into two cohorts: those received CA versus conventional therapy. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, recurrent AF, and heart failure (HF) hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 64,743 patients remained in each cohort. The mean age was 73.4 ± 11.4 years in the CA cohort and 73.5 ± 11.5 years in the control cohort (p = 0.109). CA was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.43-0.49, p < 0.001), all-cause hospitalization (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.95, p < 0.001) and recurrent AF (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.79-0.82, p < 0.001) but higher HF hospitalization (HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.06-1.08, p < 0.001) compared to conventional therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that in patients with AF and HFrEF, CA was associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and AF recurrence, but an increased risk of HF hospitalization compared to conventional therapy. These findings suggest that CA may provide substantial long-term benefits in this high-risk population, while highlighting the importance of careful patient selection and post-procedural management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1037-1046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.
Background: While catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an effective treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), its impact on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with concomitant heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains uncertain.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of CA versus conventional therapy in patients with HFrEF and AF.
Methods: We utilized data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (January 2014-December 2024) with a 3-year follow-up period. Patients aged ≥18 years with HFrEF (EF < 40%) and AF were categorized into two cohorts: those received CA versus conventional therapy. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, recurrent AF, and heart failure (HF) hospitalization.
Results: After propensity score matching, 64,743 patients remained in each cohort. The mean age was 73.4 ± 11.4 years in the CA cohort and 73.5 ± 11.5 years in the control cohort (p = 0.109). CA was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.43-0.49, p < 0.001), all-cause hospitalization (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.95, p < 0.001) and recurrent AF (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.79-0.82, p < 0.001) but higher HF hospitalization (HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.06-1.08, p < 0.001) compared to conventional therapy.
Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that in patients with AF and HFrEF, CA was associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and AF recurrence, but an increased risk of HF hospitalization compared to conventional therapy. These findings suggest that CA may provide substantial long-term benefits in this high-risk population, while highlighting the importance of careful patient selection and post-procedural management.