导管消融治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低心房颤动患者的长期疗效。

IF 1.3
Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1111/pace.70017
Mohammed Nor, Olayiwola Bolaji, Ali Bilal, Mohamed S Mahmoud, Abdirahman Wardhere, Jarrett Kelley, Chafik Assal
{"title":"导管消融治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低心房颤动患者的长期疗效。","authors":"Mohammed Nor, Olayiwola Bolaji, Ali Bilal, Mohamed S Mahmoud, Abdirahman Wardhere, Jarrett Kelley, Chafik Assal","doi":"10.1111/pace.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an effective treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), its impact on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with concomitant heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of CA versus conventional therapy in patients with HFrEF and AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (January 2014-December 2024) with a 3-year follow-up period. Patients aged ≥18 years with HFrEF (EF < 40%) and AF were categorized into two cohorts: those received CA versus conventional therapy. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, recurrent AF, and heart failure (HF) hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 64,743 patients remained in each cohort. The mean age was 73.4 ± 11.4 years in the CA cohort and 73.5 ± 11.5 years in the control cohort (p = 0.109). CA was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.43-0.49, p < 0.001), all-cause hospitalization (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.95, p < 0.001) and recurrent AF (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.79-0.82, p < 0.001) but higher HF hospitalization (HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.06-1.08, p < 0.001) compared to conventional therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that in patients with AF and HFrEF, CA was associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and AF recurrence, but an increased risk of HF hospitalization compared to conventional therapy. These findings suggest that CA may provide substantial long-term benefits in this high-risk population, while highlighting the importance of careful patient selection and post-procedural management.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"1037-1046"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Nor, Olayiwola Bolaji, Ali Bilal, Mohamed S Mahmoud, Abdirahman Wardhere, Jarrett Kelley, Chafik Assal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an effective treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), its impact on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with concomitant heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of CA versus conventional therapy in patients with HFrEF and AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (January 2014-December 2024) with a 3-year follow-up period. Patients aged ≥18 years with HFrEF (EF < 40%) and AF were categorized into two cohorts: those received CA versus conventional therapy. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, recurrent AF, and heart failure (HF) hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 64,743 patients remained in each cohort. The mean age was 73.4 ± 11.4 years in the CA cohort and 73.5 ± 11.5 years in the control cohort (p = 0.109). CA was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.43-0.49, p < 0.001), all-cause hospitalization (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.95, p < 0.001) and recurrent AF (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.79-0.82, p < 0.001) but higher HF hospitalization (HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.06-1.08, p < 0.001) compared to conventional therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that in patients with AF and HFrEF, CA was associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and AF recurrence, but an increased risk of HF hospitalization compared to conventional therapy. These findings suggest that CA may provide substantial long-term benefits in this high-risk population, while highlighting the importance of careful patient selection and post-procedural management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1037-1046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然导管消融(CA)已成为治疗症状性心房颤动(AF)的有效方法,但其对伴有心力衰竭并射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者的长期临床结果的影响仍不确定。目的:本研究旨在评估CA与常规治疗对HFrEF和af患者的临床结果。方法:我们利用TriNetX美国协作网络(2014年1月- 2024年12月)的数据,随访3年。年龄≥18岁的HFrEF患者(EF)结果:倾向评分匹配后,每个队列中仍有64,743例患者。CA组平均年龄为73.4±11.4岁,对照组平均年龄为73.5±11.5岁(p = 0.109)。CA与全因死亡率降低相关(HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.43-0.49, p)结论:我们的研究表明,在房颤和HFrEF患者中,CA与全因死亡率、全因住院和房颤复发显著降低相关,但与常规治疗相比,HF住院的风险增加。这些发现表明,CA可能为这一高危人群提供实质性的长期益处,同时强调了仔细选择患者和术后管理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Background: While catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an effective treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), its impact on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with concomitant heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains uncertain.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of CA versus conventional therapy in patients with HFrEF and AF.

Methods: We utilized data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (January 2014-December 2024) with a 3-year follow-up period. Patients aged ≥18 years with HFrEF (EF < 40%) and AF were categorized into two cohorts: those received CA versus conventional therapy. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, recurrent AF, and heart failure (HF) hospitalization.

Results: After propensity score matching, 64,743 patients remained in each cohort. The mean age was 73.4 ± 11.4 years in the CA cohort and 73.5 ± 11.5 years in the control cohort (p = 0.109). CA was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.43-0.49, p < 0.001), all-cause hospitalization (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.95, p < 0.001) and recurrent AF (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.79-0.82, p < 0.001) but higher HF hospitalization (HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.06-1.08, p < 0.001) compared to conventional therapy.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that in patients with AF and HFrEF, CA was associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and AF recurrence, but an increased risk of HF hospitalization compared to conventional therapy. These findings suggest that CA may provide substantial long-term benefits in this high-risk population, while highlighting the importance of careful patient selection and post-procedural management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信