没有显微镜的显微镜?德国2019冠状病毒病大流行期间牙科解剖学研究的机遇和局限性

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2025-07-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.20580.3
Ann-Kathrin Peters, Karsten Winter, Elisabeth Witt, Hubert-Mario Kuntzsch, Sabine Löffler
{"title":"没有显微镜的显微镜?德国2019冠状病毒病大流行期间牙科解剖学研究的机遇和局限性","authors":"Ann-Kathrin Peters, Karsten Winter, Elisabeth Witt, Hubert-Mario Kuntzsch, Sabine Löffler","doi":"10.12688/mep.20580.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the microscopy course as part of the dental medical training in Leipzig, Germany, was transformed from a classroom-only course into a purely digital and later hybrid course with reduced attendance time. Aim of this educational research study is the detailed evaluation of digital and hybrid courses regarding students' perception and learning outcome. Based on the findings current teaching should be critically scrutinised, resulting in a modern design of the histology curricula.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an educational research study. The students' subjective experiences are measured with the help of an evaluation survey and the learning success was objectively measured using a digital assessment course. Data was collected in two consecutive year groups of dentistry students, each after completion of the second semester. Cohort A consisted of 56 students, cohort B of 54 students. The sampling was purposive and the sample size equals the sample population (closed population of A+B = 110). A statistial analysis of the quantitative results were carried out and quantitative results were analysed using content-structuring qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students are predominantly positive about hybrid teaching approaches, although limitations such as perceived deterioration of the quality of teaching and insufficient learning success in cohort A can be identified. Hybrid teaching cohort B showed significantly better learning success than the purely digital cohort A.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Particularly digital lecture formats and the CUVM have been valued by students. In addition, practical courses with appropriate resources (e.g. CUVM, digital identification course) can benefit from a blended approach. Regardless of the continued importance of practical training in dental studies, digital teaching formats developed as an emergency solution at the beginning of the pandemic should be evaluated in regard to their success and the existing potential should be further expanded in a targeted manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"15 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microscopy without a microscope? Opportunities and limitations of dental studies in anatomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.\",\"authors\":\"Ann-Kathrin Peters, Karsten Winter, Elisabeth Witt, Hubert-Mario Kuntzsch, Sabine Löffler\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/mep.20580.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the microscopy course as part of the dental medical training in Leipzig, Germany, was transformed from a classroom-only course into a purely digital and later hybrid course with reduced attendance time. Aim of this educational research study is the detailed evaluation of digital and hybrid courses regarding students' perception and learning outcome. Based on the findings current teaching should be critically scrutinised, resulting in a modern design of the histology curricula.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an educational research study. The students' subjective experiences are measured with the help of an evaluation survey and the learning success was objectively measured using a digital assessment course. Data was collected in two consecutive year groups of dentistry students, each after completion of the second semester. Cohort A consisted of 56 students, cohort B of 54 students. The sampling was purposive and the sample size equals the sample population (closed population of A+B = 110). A statistial analysis of the quantitative results were carried out and quantitative results were analysed using content-structuring qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students are predominantly positive about hybrid teaching approaches, although limitations such as perceived deterioration of the quality of teaching and insufficient learning success in cohort A can be identified. Hybrid teaching cohort B showed significantly better learning success than the purely digital cohort A.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Particularly digital lecture formats and the CUVM have been valued by students. In addition, practical courses with appropriate resources (e.g. CUVM, digital identification course) can benefit from a blended approach. Regardless of the continued importance of practical training in dental studies, digital teaching formats developed as an emergency solution at the beginning of the pandemic should be evaluated in regard to their success and the existing potential should be further expanded in a targeted manner.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329405/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20580.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20580.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于COVID-19大流行的爆发,作为德国莱比锡牙科医学培训的一部分,显微镜课程从纯课堂课程转变为纯数字课程,后来改为混合课程,减少了出勤时间。本教育研究的目的是详细评估数位与混合课程对学生认知与学习结果的影响。基于这些发现,当前的教学应该被严格审查,从而导致组织学课程的现代设计。方法:本研究为教育研究性研究。通过评价调查测量学生的主观体验,使用数字化评估课程客观测量学生的学习成功。数据在连续两组牙科学生中收集,每组在第二学期完成后。A组56名学生,B组54名学生。抽样是有目的的,样本量等于样本总体(A+B的封闭总体= 110)。对定量结果进行统计分析,对定量结果进行内容结构定性内容分析。结果:学生主要对混合教学方法持积极态度,尽管在队列A中可以识别出教学质量的感知恶化和学习成功不足等局限性。混合教学组B的学习成功率明显高于纯数字组a。讨论:特别是数字讲座形式和CUVM受到学生的重视。此外,具有适当资源的实践课程(例如,CUVM,数字识别课程)可以从混合方法中受益。尽管牙科研究方面的实践培训仍然很重要,但应评估在大流行开始时作为紧急解决办法开发的数字教学格式的成功情况,并有针对性地进一步扩大现有潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Microscopy without a microscope? Opportunities and limitations of dental studies in anatomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.

Microscopy without a microscope? Opportunities and limitations of dental studies in anatomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.

Microscopy without a microscope? Opportunities and limitations of dental studies in anatomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.

Microscopy without a microscope? Opportunities and limitations of dental studies in anatomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.

Microscopy without a microscope? Opportunities and limitations of dental studies in anatomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.

Microscopy without a microscope? Opportunities and limitations of dental studies in anatomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.

Microscopy without a microscope? Opportunities and limitations of dental studies in anatomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.

Aim: Due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the microscopy course as part of the dental medical training in Leipzig, Germany, was transformed from a classroom-only course into a purely digital and later hybrid course with reduced attendance time. Aim of this educational research study is the detailed evaluation of digital and hybrid courses regarding students' perception and learning outcome. Based on the findings current teaching should be critically scrutinised, resulting in a modern design of the histology curricula.

Methods: This is an educational research study. The students' subjective experiences are measured with the help of an evaluation survey and the learning success was objectively measured using a digital assessment course. Data was collected in two consecutive year groups of dentistry students, each after completion of the second semester. Cohort A consisted of 56 students, cohort B of 54 students. The sampling was purposive and the sample size equals the sample population (closed population of A+B = 110). A statistial analysis of the quantitative results were carried out and quantitative results were analysed using content-structuring qualitative content analysis.

Results: Students are predominantly positive about hybrid teaching approaches, although limitations such as perceived deterioration of the quality of teaching and insufficient learning success in cohort A can be identified. Hybrid teaching cohort B showed significantly better learning success than the purely digital cohort A.

Discussion: Particularly digital lecture formats and the CUVM have been valued by students. In addition, practical courses with appropriate resources (e.g. CUVM, digital identification course) can benefit from a blended approach. Regardless of the continued importance of practical training in dental studies, digital teaching formats developed as an emergency solution at the beginning of the pandemic should be evaluated in regard to their success and the existing potential should be further expanded in a targeted manner.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信