冠状动脉疾病的治疗是否遵循拟议指南和SYNTAX研究中的建议?

IF 1.2
Helmgton José Brito de Souza, Beatriz Estrella Souza, Thiago Amaral Cavalcante, Eduardo Ferreira Sales, Natália Lopes Kairala, Rafaela Salviolo, Leonardo Jadyr Silva Alves, Diogo Assis Souza, Rafael Ramos Amaral, Maria Paula Meireles Fenelon, Henrique Louzan Machado, Leopoldo Nucci
{"title":"冠状动脉疾病的治疗是否遵循拟议指南和SYNTAX研究中的建议?","authors":"Helmgton José Brito de Souza, Beatriz Estrella Souza, Thiago Amaral Cavalcante, Eduardo Ferreira Sales, Natália Lopes Kairala, Rafaela Salviolo, Leonardo Jadyr Silva Alves, Diogo Assis Souza, Rafael Ramos Amaral, Maria Paula Meireles Fenelon, Henrique Louzan Machado, Leopoldo Nucci","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the main cause of death among cardiovascular diseases. Current guidelines aim to guide clinical practice in choosing the best treatment, based on the best scientific evidence. The SYnergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) score uses anatomical and clinical factors, helping to assess the complexity of coronary lesions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To verify whether the treatment used in CAD complied with the recommendations set out in the guidelines and in the SYNTAX study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center, cross-sectional, observational, descriptive, and retrospective study, which analyzed medical records over a three-year period. Patients diagnosed with CAD who had obstructive disease in at least two vessels were selected. The exams were evaluated by a specialist who was unaware of the report and the treatment used for each patient. SYNTAX 1 and 2 scores were calculated, and the recommended treatment was compared to the established treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and ten patients were distributed, according to SYNTAX Score 1, into the groups low (Group A), intermediate (Group B), and high risk (Group C). Of 155 patients in Groups B and C, 105 (67.7%) were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), vs. 24 (15.5%) with CABG. When calculating the SYNTAX Score 2 of the 101 patients with recommended treatment for CABG, 71 (70.3%) received PCI, compared to 18 (17.8%) treated with CABG. All patients recommended for preferential treatment for PCI had the recommendation respected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment offered was not supported by current guidelines and recommendations. Expanding the sample size may determine the current situation of the treatment of CAD in Brazil.</p>","PeriodicalId":72457,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"40 5","pages":"e20240248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease Following the Recommendations Set Out in the Proposed Guidelines and in the SYNTAX Study?\",\"authors\":\"Helmgton José Brito de Souza, Beatriz Estrella Souza, Thiago Amaral Cavalcante, Eduardo Ferreira Sales, Natália Lopes Kairala, Rafaela Salviolo, Leonardo Jadyr Silva Alves, Diogo Assis Souza, Rafael Ramos Amaral, Maria Paula Meireles Fenelon, Henrique Louzan Machado, Leopoldo Nucci\",\"doi\":\"10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the main cause of death among cardiovascular diseases. Current guidelines aim to guide clinical practice in choosing the best treatment, based on the best scientific evidence. The SYnergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) score uses anatomical and clinical factors, helping to assess the complexity of coronary lesions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To verify whether the treatment used in CAD complied with the recommendations set out in the guidelines and in the SYNTAX study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center, cross-sectional, observational, descriptive, and retrospective study, which analyzed medical records over a three-year period. Patients diagnosed with CAD who had obstructive disease in at least two vessels were selected. The exams were evaluated by a specialist who was unaware of the report and the treatment used for each patient. SYNTAX 1 and 2 scores were calculated, and the recommended treatment was compared to the established treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and ten patients were distributed, according to SYNTAX Score 1, into the groups low (Group A), intermediate (Group B), and high risk (Group C). Of 155 patients in Groups B and C, 105 (67.7%) were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), vs. 24 (15.5%) with CABG. When calculating the SYNTAX Score 2 of the 101 patients with recommended treatment for CABG, 71 (70.3%) received PCI, compared to 18 (17.8%) treated with CABG. All patients recommended for preferential treatment for PCI had the recommendation respected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment offered was not supported by current guidelines and recommendations. Expanding the sample size may determine the current situation of the treatment of CAD in Brazil.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"e20240248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是导致死亡的主要心血管疾病。目前的指南旨在指导临床实践,根据最佳科学证据选择最佳治疗方法。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术之间的协同作用(SYNTAX)评分使用解剖学和临床因素,有助于评估冠状动脉病变的复杂性。目的:验证CAD中使用的治疗方法是否符合指南和SYNTAX研究中的建议。方法:单中心、横断面、观察性、描述性和回顾性研究,分析了三年的医疗记录。被诊断为CAD且至少有两条血管存在阻塞性疾病的患者被选中。检查是由一位不知道报告和每个病人的治疗方法的专家评估的。计算SYNTAX 1和SYNTAX 2评分,并将推荐治疗与既定治疗进行比较。结果:210例患者按照SYNTAX Score 1分为低危组(A组)、中危组(B组)和高危组(C组)。在B组和C组的155例患者中,105例(67.7%)接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI), 24例(15.5%)接受了CABG。当计算101例推荐CABG治疗的患者的SYNTAX评分2时,71例(70.3%)接受了PCI治疗,而18例(17.8%)接受了CABG治疗。所有推荐优先接受PCI治疗的患者均得到尊重。结论:目前的指南和建议不支持该治疗方法。扩大样本量可以确定巴西CAD治疗的现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease Following the Recommendations Set Out in the Proposed Guidelines and in the SYNTAX Study?

Introduction: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the main cause of death among cardiovascular diseases. Current guidelines aim to guide clinical practice in choosing the best treatment, based on the best scientific evidence. The SYnergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) score uses anatomical and clinical factors, helping to assess the complexity of coronary lesions.

Objective: To verify whether the treatment used in CAD complied with the recommendations set out in the guidelines and in the SYNTAX study.

Methods: Single-center, cross-sectional, observational, descriptive, and retrospective study, which analyzed medical records over a three-year period. Patients diagnosed with CAD who had obstructive disease in at least two vessels were selected. The exams were evaluated by a specialist who was unaware of the report and the treatment used for each patient. SYNTAX 1 and 2 scores were calculated, and the recommended treatment was compared to the established treatment.

Results: Two hundred and ten patients were distributed, according to SYNTAX Score 1, into the groups low (Group A), intermediate (Group B), and high risk (Group C). Of 155 patients in Groups B and C, 105 (67.7%) were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), vs. 24 (15.5%) with CABG. When calculating the SYNTAX Score 2 of the 101 patients with recommended treatment for CABG, 71 (70.3%) received PCI, compared to 18 (17.8%) treated with CABG. All patients recommended for preferential treatment for PCI had the recommendation respected.

Conclusion: The treatment offered was not supported by current guidelines and recommendations. Expanding the sample size may determine the current situation of the treatment of CAD in Brazil.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信