盒子和虚拟模拟器腹腔镜基础知识I:从课程参与者的角度进行10年(2014-2024)评估。

Q4 Medicine
Z Chovanec, A Berková, J Habr, T Paseka, F Sasínek, P Štourač, I Penka
{"title":"盒子和虚拟模拟器腹腔镜基础知识I:从课程参与者的角度进行10年(2014-2024)评估。","authors":"Z Chovanec, A Berková, J Habr, T Paseka, F Sasínek, P Štourač, I Penka","doi":"10.48095/ccrvch2025283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and aims: </strong>The training of young surgeons in the Czech Republic includes the completion of mini-invasive, laparoscopic simulation courses on a voluntary basis. The aim of this study is to show how simulation is used now to train surgeons and to look back at 10 years of running a simulation, laparoscopic, mini-invasive course from the graduates' points of view using box and virtual reality simulators.</p><p><strong>Type of study: </strong>Observational, survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 26 courses (2014-2024) by an anonymous question-naire. The questionnaires were completed by all graduates (100%). Their evaluation was done by the descriptive statistics method. Questions were asked about expecta-tions and fulfilment of the expectations from the course with its possible recommendation and financial cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 96 doctors, 55 men and 41 women, participated in the courses. The questionnaires were completed by all participants. In 89 cases (92.7%), the candi-dates wanted to learn the correct technique, tips, and tricks in laparoscopic surgery; in 42 cases (43.8%), they expected an increase in the operative time; and in 37 cases (38.5%), a deepening of anatomical and theoretical knowledge was mentioned. The course completely fulfilled the expectations in 92% of the cases, in 6.0% of the cases, it fulfilled them with minor reservations and in 2.0% it fulfilled them partially. Ninety seven percent of participants would recommend the course as compulsory; 3% would leave its recommendation to the discretion of the graduate. Twenty-eight participants (29.2%) fully paid for the course; 5 (5.2%) participants partially paid; and 63 (65.6%) participants received payment from their employer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The participants recommended the simulation course for compulsory inclusion in the surgical education curriculum, and about one-third of them also expressed willingness to pay for the optional education. Although simulators and simulations in surgery represent an important training potential, the subsequent role of mentor in the form of certified, experienced colleague(s) cannot be replaced by them.</p>","PeriodicalId":52413,"journal":{"name":"Rozhledy v Chirurgii","volume":"104 7","pages":"283-288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basics of laparoscopy on box and virtual simulators I: a 10-year (2014-2024) evaluation from the perspective of the course participants.\",\"authors\":\"Z Chovanec, A Berková, J Habr, T Paseka, F Sasínek, P Štourač, I Penka\",\"doi\":\"10.48095/ccrvch2025283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and aims: </strong>The training of young surgeons in the Czech Republic includes the completion of mini-invasive, laparoscopic simulation courses on a voluntary basis. The aim of this study is to show how simulation is used now to train surgeons and to look back at 10 years of running a simulation, laparoscopic, mini-invasive course from the graduates' points of view using box and virtual reality simulators.</p><p><strong>Type of study: </strong>Observational, survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 26 courses (2014-2024) by an anonymous question-naire. The questionnaires were completed by all graduates (100%). Their evaluation was done by the descriptive statistics method. Questions were asked about expecta-tions and fulfilment of the expectations from the course with its possible recommendation and financial cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 96 doctors, 55 men and 41 women, participated in the courses. The questionnaires were completed by all participants. In 89 cases (92.7%), the candi-dates wanted to learn the correct technique, tips, and tricks in laparoscopic surgery; in 42 cases (43.8%), they expected an increase in the operative time; and in 37 cases (38.5%), a deepening of anatomical and theoretical knowledge was mentioned. The course completely fulfilled the expectations in 92% of the cases, in 6.0% of the cases, it fulfilled them with minor reservations and in 2.0% it fulfilled them partially. Ninety seven percent of participants would recommend the course as compulsory; 3% would leave its recommendation to the discretion of the graduate. Twenty-eight participants (29.2%) fully paid for the course; 5 (5.2%) participants partially paid; and 63 (65.6%) participants received payment from their employer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The participants recommended the simulation course for compulsory inclusion in the surgical education curriculum, and about one-third of them also expressed willingness to pay for the optional education. Although simulators and simulations in surgery represent an important training potential, the subsequent role of mentor in the form of certified, experienced colleague(s) cannot be replaced by them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rozhledy v Chirurgii\",\"volume\":\"104 7\",\"pages\":\"283-288\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rozhledy v Chirurgii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccrvch2025283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rozhledy v Chirurgii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccrvch2025283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介和目的:捷克共和国对年轻外科医生的培训包括在自愿的基础上完成微创腹腔镜模拟课程。这项研究的目的是展示如何使用模拟技术来训练外科医生,并从毕业生的角度回顾10年来使用盒子和虚拟现实模拟器运行模拟,腹腔镜,微创课程的情况。研究类型:观察、调查。方法:采用匿名问卷法收集2014-2024年26个疗程的临床资料。问卷全部由毕业生完成(100%)。采用描述性统计方法对其进行评价。问题是关于课程的期望和期望的实现,以及可能的推荐和财务成本。结果:共有96名医生参加了课程,其中男55名,女41名。所有参与者都完成了问卷调查。89例(92.7%)考生希望学习腹腔镜手术的正确技术、技巧和技巧;42例(43.8%)患者预期手术时间增加;37例(38.5%)患者提到加深解剖和理论知识。92%的案例中课程完全达到预期,6.0%的案例中略有保留,2.0%的案例中部分达到预期。97%的参与者将推荐这门课程作为必修课;3%的人会将其推荐留给毕业生自行决定。28名学员(29.2%)全额支付课程费用;5名(5.2%)参与者获得部分报酬;63名(65.6%)参与者从雇主那里获得报酬。结论:参与者推荐将模拟课程作为外科教育课程的必修课,约三分之一的参与者也表示愿意支付选修课程的费用。虽然外科中的模拟器和模拟代表了重要的培训潜力,但随后以经过认证的、有经验的同事的形式担任导师的角色是不能被它们取代的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Basics of laparoscopy on box and virtual simulators I: a 10-year (2014-2024) evaluation from the perspective of the course participants.

Introduction and aims: The training of young surgeons in the Czech Republic includes the completion of mini-invasive, laparoscopic simulation courses on a voluntary basis. The aim of this study is to show how simulation is used now to train surgeons and to look back at 10 years of running a simulation, laparoscopic, mini-invasive course from the graduates' points of view using box and virtual reality simulators.

Type of study: Observational, survey.

Methods: Data were collected from 26 courses (2014-2024) by an anonymous question-naire. The questionnaires were completed by all graduates (100%). Their evaluation was done by the descriptive statistics method. Questions were asked about expecta-tions and fulfilment of the expectations from the course with its possible recommendation and financial cost.

Results: A total of 96 doctors, 55 men and 41 women, participated in the courses. The questionnaires were completed by all participants. In 89 cases (92.7%), the candi-dates wanted to learn the correct technique, tips, and tricks in laparoscopic surgery; in 42 cases (43.8%), they expected an increase in the operative time; and in 37 cases (38.5%), a deepening of anatomical and theoretical knowledge was mentioned. The course completely fulfilled the expectations in 92% of the cases, in 6.0% of the cases, it fulfilled them with minor reservations and in 2.0% it fulfilled them partially. Ninety seven percent of participants would recommend the course as compulsory; 3% would leave its recommendation to the discretion of the graduate. Twenty-eight participants (29.2%) fully paid for the course; 5 (5.2%) participants partially paid; and 63 (65.6%) participants received payment from their employer.

Conclusion: The participants recommended the simulation course for compulsory inclusion in the surgical education curriculum, and about one-third of them also expressed willingness to pay for the optional education. Although simulators and simulations in surgery represent an important training potential, the subsequent role of mentor in the form of certified, experienced colleague(s) cannot be replaced by them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rozhledy v Chirurgii
Rozhledy v Chirurgii Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信