胶质瘤术后肿瘤复发与假性进展的鉴别:六种扩散模型的比较研究。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Peiquan Liu , Yujie Chen , Jing Zhao , Ning Zheng , Yue Hu , Tengfei Chao , Jiaxuan Zhang , Wenzhen Zhu
{"title":"胶质瘤术后肿瘤复发与假性进展的鉴别:六种扩散模型的比较研究。","authors":"Peiquan Liu ,&nbsp;Yujie Chen ,&nbsp;Jing Zhao ,&nbsp;Ning Zheng ,&nbsp;Yue Hu ,&nbsp;Tengfei Chao ,&nbsp;Jiaxuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenzhen Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.07.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study is to investigate whether six diffusion models derived from multi-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging can enhance the differentiation between pseudoprogression (PsP) and postoperative tumor recurrence (TR) in glioma patients, with the aim of providing clinical insights.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted on 82 patients with WHO grade 2–4 gliomas who underwent surgery at our hospital, with MRI sequences including T<sub>1</sub>WI, T<sub>2</sub>WI, T<sub>2</sub>FLAIR, contrast-enhanced T<sub>1</sub>WI, and multi-b-value DWI. Postoperative follow-up or secondary surgery pathology confirmed 46 cases of TR and 36 cases of PsP. Six diffusion models were fitted based on multi-b-value DWI sequences, including monoexponential DWI (Mono_DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), stretched-exponential model (SEM), fractional-order calculus (FROC), and continuous-time random-walk (CTRW) model. ROIs were manually outlined to calculate the average values of each parameter. Differences between the two groups were compared using T-tests or Mann–Whitney U tests. The diagnostic performance of individual parameters was analyzed using ROC curve analysis, and the diagnostic performance of each model was compared using multivariate logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 14 parameter maps, significant differences were found in all models (P&lt;0.0036) except for IVIM_D*, IVIM_f. ROC curve analysis showed that CTRW_D demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.8484 (0.7549–0.9240). Further analysis of the diffusion models showed that CTRW performed the best among all models, with an AUC of 0.8635 (0.7816–0.9454), slightly higher than the FROC model, which had an AUC of 0.8629 (0.7839–0.9420).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The various diffusion models derived from multi-b-value DWI sequences can effectively distinguish between postoperative recurrence and pseudoprogression in gliomas. Among these models, the CTRW and FROC models are the two optimal models, demonstrating comparable diagnostic performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 10","pages":"Pages 6181-6193"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiation of Postoperative Tumor Recurrence and Pseudoprogression in Gliomas: A Comparative Study of Six Diffusion Models\",\"authors\":\"Peiquan Liu ,&nbsp;Yujie Chen ,&nbsp;Jing Zhao ,&nbsp;Ning Zheng ,&nbsp;Yue Hu ,&nbsp;Tengfei Chao ,&nbsp;Jiaxuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenzhen Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2025.07.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study is to investigate whether six diffusion models derived from multi-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging can enhance the differentiation between pseudoprogression (PsP) and postoperative tumor recurrence (TR) in glioma patients, with the aim of providing clinical insights.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted on 82 patients with WHO grade 2–4 gliomas who underwent surgery at our hospital, with MRI sequences including T<sub>1</sub>WI, T<sub>2</sub>WI, T<sub>2</sub>FLAIR, contrast-enhanced T<sub>1</sub>WI, and multi-b-value DWI. Postoperative follow-up or secondary surgery pathology confirmed 46 cases of TR and 36 cases of PsP. Six diffusion models were fitted based on multi-b-value DWI sequences, including monoexponential DWI (Mono_DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), stretched-exponential model (SEM), fractional-order calculus (FROC), and continuous-time random-walk (CTRW) model. ROIs were manually outlined to calculate the average values of each parameter. Differences between the two groups were compared using T-tests or Mann–Whitney U tests. The diagnostic performance of individual parameters was analyzed using ROC curve analysis, and the diagnostic performance of each model was compared using multivariate logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 14 parameter maps, significant differences were found in all models (P&lt;0.0036) except for IVIM_D*, IVIM_f. ROC curve analysis showed that CTRW_D demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.8484 (0.7549–0.9240). Further analysis of the diffusion models showed that CTRW performed the best among all models, with an AUC of 0.8635 (0.7816–0.9454), slightly higher than the FROC model, which had an AUC of 0.8629 (0.7839–0.9420).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The various diffusion models derived from multi-b-value DWI sequences can effectively distinguish between postoperative recurrence and pseudoprogression in gliomas. Among these models, the CTRW and FROC models are the two optimal models, demonstrating comparable diagnostic performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"32 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 6181-6193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633225007056\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633225007056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由与目的:本研究的目的是探讨由多b值弥散加权成像衍生的六种弥散模型是否可以增强胶质瘤患者假进展(PsP)和术后肿瘤复发(TR)的鉴别,以期提供临床见解。材料与方法:回顾性研究82例在我院行手术的WHO 2-4级胶质瘤患者的MRI序列,包括T1WI、T2WI、T2FLAIR、增强T1WI、多b值DWI。术后随访或二次手术病理证实46例TR, 36例PsP。基于多b值DWI序列拟合了6种扩散模型,包括单指数DWI (Mono_DWI)、体内非相干运动(IVIM)、扩散峰态成像(DKI)、拉伸指数模型(SEM)、分数阶微积分(FROC)和连续时间随机漫步(CTRW)模型。人工勾画roi来计算每个参数的平均值。使用t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验比较两组之间的差异。采用ROC曲线分析各参数的诊断效能,采用多元logistic回归比较各模型的诊断效能。结果:在14个参数图中,所有模型均存在显著差异(p)。结论:多b值DWI序列衍生的各种扩散模型可有效区分胶质瘤术后复发和假性进展。在这些模型中,CTRW和FROC模型是两个最优模型,表现出相当的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differentiation of Postoperative Tumor Recurrence and Pseudoprogression in Gliomas: A Comparative Study of Six Diffusion Models

Rationale and Objectives

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether six diffusion models derived from multi-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging can enhance the differentiation between pseudoprogression (PsP) and postoperative tumor recurrence (TR) in glioma patients, with the aim of providing clinical insights.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 82 patients with WHO grade 2–4 gliomas who underwent surgery at our hospital, with MRI sequences including T1WI, T2WI, T2FLAIR, contrast-enhanced T1WI, and multi-b-value DWI. Postoperative follow-up or secondary surgery pathology confirmed 46 cases of TR and 36 cases of PsP. Six diffusion models were fitted based on multi-b-value DWI sequences, including monoexponential DWI (Mono_DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), stretched-exponential model (SEM), fractional-order calculus (FROC), and continuous-time random-walk (CTRW) model. ROIs were manually outlined to calculate the average values of each parameter. Differences between the two groups were compared using T-tests or Mann–Whitney U tests. The diagnostic performance of individual parameters was analyzed using ROC curve analysis, and the diagnostic performance of each model was compared using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Among the 14 parameter maps, significant differences were found in all models (P<0.0036) except for IVIM_D*, IVIM_f. ROC curve analysis showed that CTRW_D demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.8484 (0.7549–0.9240). Further analysis of the diffusion models showed that CTRW performed the best among all models, with an AUC of 0.8635 (0.7816–0.9454), slightly higher than the FROC model, which had an AUC of 0.8629 (0.7839–0.9420).

Conclusion

The various diffusion models derived from multi-b-value DWI sequences can effectively distinguish between postoperative recurrence and pseudoprogression in gliomas. Among these models, the CTRW and FROC models are the two optimal models, demonstrating comparable diagnostic performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信