W Blake LeMaster, Sarah A Ingersoll, Hyewon Phee, Renee Wen, Jing Bai, John A Belperio, Russell G Buhr, Jonathan E Phillips, Vyacheslav Palchevskiy, Tiffany Bina, Donald P Tashkin, Christopher B Cooper, Igor Z Barjaktarevic
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病2型炎症的诊断:加州大学洛杉矶分校慢性阻塞性肺病表型研究中血液和痰嗜酸性粒细胞评估的比较","authors":"W Blake LeMaster, Sarah A Ingersoll, Hyewon Phee, Renee Wen, Jing Bai, John A Belperio, Russell G Buhr, Jonathan E Phillips, Vyacheslav Palchevskiy, Tiffany Bina, Donald P Tashkin, Christopher B Cooper, Igor Z Barjaktarevic","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) phenotyping is an approach for developing tailored therapies. The eosinophilic phenotype is associated with exacerbation risk and response to specific treatments. This study evaluates the relationship between sputum and blood eosinophilia, hypothesizing that sputum eosinophil percentage (SpE%) better reflects disease severity and exacerbation risk than blood eosinophil counts (BEC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, prospective observational cohort with 107 participants aged 40-80 with clinically diagnosed COPD. Participants completed spirometry, a 6-minute walk test, and questionnaires, and blood and sputum samples were provided at baseline and 3 months. BEC and SpE% were measured via routine complete blood counts and flow cytometric analyses (fluorescence-activated cell sorting [FACS]). Eosinophilic phenotype thresholds were defined as BEC≥300 cells/μL and SpE%≥2%, and associations with clinical characteristics and outcomes were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adequate sputum specimens were obtained less frequently than blood (60.7% versus 98%). SpE% showed poor repeatability (interclass coefficient 0.36) and poor correlation with FACS (Spearman's 𝜌=0.008, <i>p</i>=0.58). Conversely, BEC showed higher repeatability (𝜌=0.67, <i>p</i><0.01) and better correlation with FACS (𝜌=0.74, <i>p</i><0.01). More participants were classified as eosinophilic COPD by sputum (33.3%) than by blood (19.6%). BEC values were poorly correlated with SpE% (𝜌=0.13, <i>P</i>=0.39), and sputum and blood-based diagnostic criteria showed poor agreement (64.5%, Cohen's 𝜅 0.10). High SpE%, but not high BEC, was associated with lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentage predicted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In stable COPD patients, BEC and SpE% did not correlate well, and blood- and sputum-based diagnostic criteria identified different individuals. Defining eosinophilic COPD requires a better understanding of the bio-compartment sampled, testing methods, and cut-off values used.</p>","PeriodicalId":51340,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","volume":" ","pages":"368-379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosing Type 2 Inflammation in COPD: Comparison of Blood and Sputum Eosinophil Assessment in the University of California Los Angeles COPD Phenotyping Study.\",\"authors\":\"W Blake LeMaster, Sarah A Ingersoll, Hyewon Phee, Renee Wen, Jing Bai, John A Belperio, Russell G Buhr, Jonathan E Phillips, Vyacheslav Palchevskiy, Tiffany Bina, Donald P Tashkin, Christopher B Cooper, Igor Z Barjaktarevic\",\"doi\":\"10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) phenotyping is an approach for developing tailored therapies. The eosinophilic phenotype is associated with exacerbation risk and response to specific treatments. This study evaluates the relationship between sputum and blood eosinophilia, hypothesizing that sputum eosinophil percentage (SpE%) better reflects disease severity and exacerbation risk than blood eosinophil counts (BEC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, prospective observational cohort with 107 participants aged 40-80 with clinically diagnosed COPD. Participants completed spirometry, a 6-minute walk test, and questionnaires, and blood and sputum samples were provided at baseline and 3 months. BEC and SpE% were measured via routine complete blood counts and flow cytometric analyses (fluorescence-activated cell sorting [FACS]). Eosinophilic phenotype thresholds were defined as BEC≥300 cells/μL and SpE%≥2%, and associations with clinical characteristics and outcomes were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adequate sputum specimens were obtained less frequently than blood (60.7% versus 98%). SpE% showed poor repeatability (interclass coefficient 0.36) and poor correlation with FACS (Spearman's 𝜌=0.008, <i>p</i>=0.58). Conversely, BEC showed higher repeatability (𝜌=0.67, <i>p</i><0.01) and better correlation with FACS (𝜌=0.74, <i>p</i><0.01). More participants were classified as eosinophilic COPD by sputum (33.3%) than by blood (19.6%). BEC values were poorly correlated with SpE% (𝜌=0.13, <i>P</i>=0.39), and sputum and blood-based diagnostic criteria showed poor agreement (64.5%, Cohen's 𝜅 0.10). High SpE%, but not high BEC, was associated with lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentage predicted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In stable COPD patients, BEC and SpE% did not correlate well, and blood- and sputum-based diagnostic criteria identified different individuals. Defining eosinophilic COPD requires a better understanding of the bio-compartment sampled, testing methods, and cut-off values used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"368-379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0599\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:COPD表型分析是开发量身定制治疗方法的一种方法。嗜酸性粒细胞表型与恶化风险和对特定治疗的反应有关。本研究评估了痰和血嗜酸性粒细胞之间的关系,假设痰嗜酸性粒细胞百分比(SpE%)比血嗜酸性粒细胞计数(BEC)更能反映疾病的严重程度和恶化风险。方法:一项单中心、前瞻性观察队列研究,纳入了107名年龄在40-80岁、临床诊断为COPD的参与者。参与者完成了肺活量测定、6分钟步行测试和问卷调查,并在基线和3个月时提供了血液和痰样本。通过常规全血细胞计数和流式细胞术分析(FACS)测量BEC和SpE%。嗜酸性粒细胞表型阈值定义为BEC≥300 cells/μL, SpE%≥2%,并研究其与临床特征和结果的关系。结果:痰标本采取率低于血标本采取率(60.7% vs 98%)。SpE%重复性差(类间系数0.36),与FACS相关性差(Spearman's𝜌=0.008,p=0.58)。相反,BEC具有较高的重复性(𝜌=0.67,预测值为p1 %)。结论:在稳定期COPD患者中,BEC和SpE%相关性不佳,基于血液和痰的诊断标准可识别不同个体。定义嗜酸性粒细胞性COPD需要更好地了解采样的生物室、测试方法和使用的临界值。
Diagnosing Type 2 Inflammation in COPD: Comparison of Blood and Sputum Eosinophil Assessment in the University of California Los Angeles COPD Phenotyping Study.
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) phenotyping is an approach for developing tailored therapies. The eosinophilic phenotype is associated with exacerbation risk and response to specific treatments. This study evaluates the relationship between sputum and blood eosinophilia, hypothesizing that sputum eosinophil percentage (SpE%) better reflects disease severity and exacerbation risk than blood eosinophil counts (BEC).
Methods: This was a single-center, prospective observational cohort with 107 participants aged 40-80 with clinically diagnosed COPD. Participants completed spirometry, a 6-minute walk test, and questionnaires, and blood and sputum samples were provided at baseline and 3 months. BEC and SpE% were measured via routine complete blood counts and flow cytometric analyses (fluorescence-activated cell sorting [FACS]). Eosinophilic phenotype thresholds were defined as BEC≥300 cells/μL and SpE%≥2%, and associations with clinical characteristics and outcomes were investigated.
Results: Adequate sputum specimens were obtained less frequently than blood (60.7% versus 98%). SpE% showed poor repeatability (interclass coefficient 0.36) and poor correlation with FACS (Spearman's 𝜌=0.008, p=0.58). Conversely, BEC showed higher repeatability (𝜌=0.67, p<0.01) and better correlation with FACS (𝜌=0.74, p<0.01). More participants were classified as eosinophilic COPD by sputum (33.3%) than by blood (19.6%). BEC values were poorly correlated with SpE% (𝜌=0.13, P=0.39), and sputum and blood-based diagnostic criteria showed poor agreement (64.5%, Cohen's 𝜅 0.10). High SpE%, but not high BEC, was associated with lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentage predicted.
Conclusions: In stable COPD patients, BEC and SpE% did not correlate well, and blood- and sputum-based diagnostic criteria identified different individuals. Defining eosinophilic COPD requires a better understanding of the bio-compartment sampled, testing methods, and cut-off values used.