Hiske Joanna Brouwer, Elco Buurma, Esther de Groot, Monika Louws, Manon Kluijtmans, Roger Anna Maria Joseph Damoiseaux, Margot Barry
{"title":"临床教师课堂跨界行为研究。一项观察研究。","authors":"Hiske Joanna Brouwer, Elco Buurma, Esther de Groot, Monika Louws, Manon Kluijtmans, Roger Anna Maria Joseph Damoiseaux, Margot Barry","doi":"10.5334/pme.1751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinician-teachers are engaged in both clinical practice and education. They positively influence student learning by connecting clinical practice and education. Most research into clinician-teacher's dual role was performed in the clinical settings where practice and teaching are intertwined. The benefits of clinician-teachers' dual role in the classroom-setting have been underexplored, whilst a large part of medical education is classroom-based. Using boundary work theory as a lens, this study aimed to illuminate clinician-teachers' observable boundary spanning behavior integrating the clinical practice and medical education in the classroom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative observation study of classroom-teaching within postgraduate general practitioner specialty training at three Dutch medical institutes was conducted. Video recordings and transcripts of classroom teaching were analyzed using a structured observation schedule. Boundary spanning behavior was categorized into: boundary bridging, boundary making and boundary maintenance. Distinctions were made between verbal- and non-verbal behavior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three categories of boundary spanning behavior were observed. Clinician-teachers demonstrated boundary bridging by integrating their own clinical experiences, by normalizing students' reported clinical experiences, by encouraging students' sharing of clinical experiences and by encouraging students to apply theory in practice. Clinician-teachers demonstrated boundary making by accentuating discontinuities between clinical practice and educational information, and boundary maintenance by allowing transient differences to exist between the two settings for didactic reasons.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This observational study contributes to an understanding of how clinician-teachers use their experience as a clinician in classroom-teaching. These insights may contribute to faculty development fostering boundary-spanning teaching practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48532,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Medical Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"462-472"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boundary Spanning Behavior of Clinician-Teachers in the Classroom. An Observation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hiske Joanna Brouwer, Elco Buurma, Esther de Groot, Monika Louws, Manon Kluijtmans, Roger Anna Maria Joseph Damoiseaux, Margot Barry\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/pme.1751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinician-teachers are engaged in both clinical practice and education. They positively influence student learning by connecting clinical practice and education. Most research into clinician-teacher's dual role was performed in the clinical settings where practice and teaching are intertwined. The benefits of clinician-teachers' dual role in the classroom-setting have been underexplored, whilst a large part of medical education is classroom-based. Using boundary work theory as a lens, this study aimed to illuminate clinician-teachers' observable boundary spanning behavior integrating the clinical practice and medical education in the classroom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative observation study of classroom-teaching within postgraduate general practitioner specialty training at three Dutch medical institutes was conducted. Video recordings and transcripts of classroom teaching were analyzed using a structured observation schedule. Boundary spanning behavior was categorized into: boundary bridging, boundary making and boundary maintenance. Distinctions were made between verbal- and non-verbal behavior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three categories of boundary spanning behavior were observed. Clinician-teachers demonstrated boundary bridging by integrating their own clinical experiences, by normalizing students' reported clinical experiences, by encouraging students' sharing of clinical experiences and by encouraging students to apply theory in practice. Clinician-teachers demonstrated boundary making by accentuating discontinuities between clinical practice and educational information, and boundary maintenance by allowing transient differences to exist between the two settings for didactic reasons.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This observational study contributes to an understanding of how clinician-teachers use their experience as a clinician in classroom-teaching. These insights may contribute to faculty development fostering boundary-spanning teaching practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"462-472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330804/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1751\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1751","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Boundary Spanning Behavior of Clinician-Teachers in the Classroom. An Observation Study.
Introduction: Clinician-teachers are engaged in both clinical practice and education. They positively influence student learning by connecting clinical practice and education. Most research into clinician-teacher's dual role was performed in the clinical settings where practice and teaching are intertwined. The benefits of clinician-teachers' dual role in the classroom-setting have been underexplored, whilst a large part of medical education is classroom-based. Using boundary work theory as a lens, this study aimed to illuminate clinician-teachers' observable boundary spanning behavior integrating the clinical practice and medical education in the classroom.
Methods: A qualitative observation study of classroom-teaching within postgraduate general practitioner specialty training at three Dutch medical institutes was conducted. Video recordings and transcripts of classroom teaching were analyzed using a structured observation schedule. Boundary spanning behavior was categorized into: boundary bridging, boundary making and boundary maintenance. Distinctions were made between verbal- and non-verbal behavior.
Results: All three categories of boundary spanning behavior were observed. Clinician-teachers demonstrated boundary bridging by integrating their own clinical experiences, by normalizing students' reported clinical experiences, by encouraging students' sharing of clinical experiences and by encouraging students to apply theory in practice. Clinician-teachers demonstrated boundary making by accentuating discontinuities between clinical practice and educational information, and boundary maintenance by allowing transient differences to exist between the two settings for didactic reasons.
Discussion: This observational study contributes to an understanding of how clinician-teachers use their experience as a clinician in classroom-teaching. These insights may contribute to faculty development fostering boundary-spanning teaching practices.
期刊介绍：
Perspectives on Medical Education mission is support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices.
Official journal of the The Netherlands Association of Medical Education (NVMO).
Perspectives on Medical Education is a non-profit Open Access journal with no charges for authors to submit or publish an article, and the full text of all articles is freely available immediately upon publication, thanks to the sponsorship of The Netherlands Association for Medical Education.
Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy.
Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary.
The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members.
The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief.
Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.
Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary.
The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members.
The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief.
Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
