行为减肥干预中恋人的破坏。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1007/s10865-025-00597-4
Marny M Ehmann, Nicole T Crane, Reena S Chabria, Danielle Arigo, Meghan L Butryn
{"title":"行为减肥干预中恋人的破坏。","authors":"Marny M Ehmann, Nicole T Crane, Reena S Chabria, Danielle Arigo, Meghan L Butryn","doi":"10.1007/s10865-025-00597-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Romantic partner undermining is a type of negative social influence that has the potential to make weight loss more challenging and consists of two components: (1) undermining behaviors, or overt romantic partner behaviors including criticism/complaint of weight control or interference behaviors (e.g., offering up high calorie foods), and (2) undermining attitudes, including negative beliefs that a romantic partner has about their significant other's weight loss attempts. The present study was the first to the authors' knowledge to investigate romantic partner undermining attitudes and behaviors reported by participants enrolled in in a behavioral weight loss (BWL) intervention, a first line treatment for weight loss. The study also examined whether partner undermining attitudes and behaviors differed by relationship quality and between those who did and did not choose their romantic partner to serve in a support role in the intervention. Participants (N = 128) enrolled in a group-based BWL intervention reported on perceived romantic partner undermining attitudes and behaviors at baseline and 3 months (end of the intensive period of BWL intervention). Results showed that participants perceived minimal romantic partner undermining at baseline (attitudes M = 2.2 ± 0.7, behaviors M = 2.3 ± 1.2) and 3 months (attitudes M = 2.0 ± 0.6, behaviors M = 1.9 ± 1.1). However, participants reported a significant reduction in total undermining attitudes (M change = - 0.2 points) and behaviors (M change = - 0.4 points) from baseline to 3 months (ps <.05), highlighting the potential of group-based BWL interventions to mitigate romantic partner undermining without explicit content focused on undermining. Future research should examine romantic partner undermining across time in varying weight control and relationship conditions and measure undermining at the daily or weekly level to reduce recall bias and improve ecological validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"813-822"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Romantic partner undermining in a behavioral weight loss intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Marny M Ehmann, Nicole T Crane, Reena S Chabria, Danielle Arigo, Meghan L Butryn\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10865-025-00597-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Romantic partner undermining is a type of negative social influence that has the potential to make weight loss more challenging and consists of two components: (1) undermining behaviors, or overt romantic partner behaviors including criticism/complaint of weight control or interference behaviors (e.g., offering up high calorie foods), and (2) undermining attitudes, including negative beliefs that a romantic partner has about their significant other's weight loss attempts. The present study was the first to the authors' knowledge to investigate romantic partner undermining attitudes and behaviors reported by participants enrolled in in a behavioral weight loss (BWL) intervention, a first line treatment for weight loss. The study also examined whether partner undermining attitudes and behaviors differed by relationship quality and between those who did and did not choose their romantic partner to serve in a support role in the intervention. Participants (N = 128) enrolled in a group-based BWL intervention reported on perceived romantic partner undermining attitudes and behaviors at baseline and 3 months (end of the intensive period of BWL intervention). Results showed that participants perceived minimal romantic partner undermining at baseline (attitudes M = 2.2 ± 0.7, behaviors M = 2.3 ± 1.2) and 3 months (attitudes M = 2.0 ± 0.6, behaviors M = 1.9 ± 1.1). However, participants reported a significant reduction in total undermining attitudes (M change = - 0.2 points) and behaviors (M change = - 0.4 points) from baseline to 3 months (ps <.05), highlighting the potential of group-based BWL interventions to mitigate romantic partner undermining without explicit content focused on undermining. Future research should examine romantic partner undermining across time in varying weight control and relationship conditions and measure undermining at the daily or weekly level to reduce recall bias and improve ecological validity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"813-822\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474614/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00597-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00597-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恋人破坏是一种消极的社会影响,它有可能使减肥变得更具挑战性,由两个部分组成:(1)破坏行为,或公开的恋人行为,包括批评/抱怨体重控制或干涉行为(例如,提供高热量食物);(2)破坏态度,包括恋人对其重要伴侣减肥尝试的消极信念。据作者所知,目前的研究首次调查了参加行为减肥(BWL)干预(减肥的一线治疗方法)的参与者所报告的浪漫伴侣破坏态度和行为。该研究还调查了伴侣破坏态度和行为是否因关系质量的不同而不同,以及是否在干预中选择了伴侣作为支持角色的人之间是否存在差异。128名参与者(N = 128)在基线和3个月(BWL干预强化期结束)时报告了他们感知到的浪漫伴侣破坏态度和行为。结果显示,受试者在基线(态度M = 2.2±0.7,行为M = 2.3±1.2)和3个月(态度M = 2.0±0.6,行为M = 1.9±1.1)时感知到最小的伴侣破坏。然而,参与者报告说,从基线到3个月,总破坏态度(M变化= - 0.2分)和行为(M变化= - 0.4分)显著减少
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Romantic partner undermining in a behavioral weight loss intervention.

Romantic partner undermining is a type of negative social influence that has the potential to make weight loss more challenging and consists of two components: (1) undermining behaviors, or overt romantic partner behaviors including criticism/complaint of weight control or interference behaviors (e.g., offering up high calorie foods), and (2) undermining attitudes, including negative beliefs that a romantic partner has about their significant other's weight loss attempts. The present study was the first to the authors' knowledge to investigate romantic partner undermining attitudes and behaviors reported by participants enrolled in in a behavioral weight loss (BWL) intervention, a first line treatment for weight loss. The study also examined whether partner undermining attitudes and behaviors differed by relationship quality and between those who did and did not choose their romantic partner to serve in a support role in the intervention. Participants (N = 128) enrolled in a group-based BWL intervention reported on perceived romantic partner undermining attitudes and behaviors at baseline and 3 months (end of the intensive period of BWL intervention). Results showed that participants perceived minimal romantic partner undermining at baseline (attitudes M = 2.2 ± 0.7, behaviors M = 2.3 ± 1.2) and 3 months (attitudes M = 2.0 ± 0.6, behaviors M = 1.9 ± 1.1). However, participants reported a significant reduction in total undermining attitudes (M change = - 0.2 points) and behaviors (M change = - 0.4 points) from baseline to 3 months (ps <.05), highlighting the potential of group-based BWL interventions to mitigate romantic partner undermining without explicit content focused on undermining. Future research should examine romantic partner undermining across time in varying weight control and relationship conditions and measure undermining at the daily or weekly level to reduce recall bias and improve ecological validity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Journal of Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders.  Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信