评估糖尿病视频胶囊内窥镜:转运时间,准备充足性,胰岛素和GLP-1受体激动剂使用的影响。

IF 2.4 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-08-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26317745251359459
Nimrod Akerman, Naomi Fliss-Isakov, Tamar Thurm, Mati Shnell, Yael Sofer, Oren Shibolet, Liat Deutsch
{"title":"评估糖尿病视频胶囊内窥镜:转运时间,准备充足性,胰岛素和GLP-1受体激动剂使用的影响。","authors":"Nimrod Akerman, Naomi Fliss-Isakov, Tamar Thurm, Mati Shnell, Yael Sofer, Oren Shibolet, Liat Deutsch","doi":"10.1177/26317745251359459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delayed gastrointestinal transit time (TT), frequently observed in diabetes mellitus (DM), may hinder bowel preparation quality and visualization in video capsule endoscopy (VCE).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aim was to compare VCE preparation adequacy and completion rates between patients with and without DM.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database, including all consecutive VCEs performed in patients aged ⩾35 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups based on a DM diagnosis reported at admission and confirmed by medication records. Clinico-demographic characteristics, bowel preparation quality, TTs, and completion rates were compared between the groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 672 included VCEs, 189 (28.1%) patients had DM and 483 (71.9%) were controls. Completion rates were comparable (DM-98.4% vs controls-99.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.553). Gastric TT was similar (DM-37.5 ± 45.5 vs controls-34.3± 48.6 min, <i>p</i> = 0.420), while small bowel TT was longer (DM-261.8 ± 95.6 vs controls-244.9 ± 98.4 min, <i>p</i> = 0.040). DM patients had higher inadequate preparation rates (31.2% vs controls-23.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.040). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for age and gender, DM was not independently associated with inadequate preparation. However, DM treated with insulin (26.5% of patients with DM) was significantly associated with inadequate bowel preparation (Odds ratio (OR) 2.355, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist usage (11.8% of patients with DM patients) compared to no-DM controls achieved borderline significance as a risk factor for preparation inadequacy (OR 2.148, 95% CI 0.887-5.201, <i>p</i> = 0.090).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VCE appears to be feasible in patients with DM, with similar completion rates and gastric TTs despite slightly prolonged small bowel TTs. However, DM treated with insulin is a significant risk factor for inadequate bowel preparation, suggesting the need for a more intensive preparation protocol within this patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":40947,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"18 ","pages":"26317745251359459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating video capsule endoscopy in diabetes mellitus: transit times, preparation adequacy, and the influence of insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist use.\",\"authors\":\"Nimrod Akerman, Naomi Fliss-Isakov, Tamar Thurm, Mati Shnell, Yael Sofer, Oren Shibolet, Liat Deutsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26317745251359459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delayed gastrointestinal transit time (TT), frequently observed in diabetes mellitus (DM), may hinder bowel preparation quality and visualization in video capsule endoscopy (VCE).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aim was to compare VCE preparation adequacy and completion rates between patients with and without DM.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database, including all consecutive VCEs performed in patients aged ⩾35 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups based on a DM diagnosis reported at admission and confirmed by medication records. Clinico-demographic characteristics, bowel preparation quality, TTs, and completion rates were compared between the groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 672 included VCEs, 189 (28.1%) patients had DM and 483 (71.9%) were controls. Completion rates were comparable (DM-98.4% vs controls-99.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.553). Gastric TT was similar (DM-37.5 ± 45.5 vs controls-34.3± 48.6 min, <i>p</i> = 0.420), while small bowel TT was longer (DM-261.8 ± 95.6 vs controls-244.9 ± 98.4 min, <i>p</i> = 0.040). DM patients had higher inadequate preparation rates (31.2% vs controls-23.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.040). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for age and gender, DM was not independently associated with inadequate preparation. However, DM treated with insulin (26.5% of patients with DM) was significantly associated with inadequate bowel preparation (Odds ratio (OR) 2.355, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist usage (11.8% of patients with DM patients) compared to no-DM controls achieved borderline significance as a risk factor for preparation inadequacy (OR 2.148, 95% CI 0.887-5.201, <i>p</i> = 0.090).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VCE appears to be feasible in patients with DM, with similar completion rates and gastric TTs despite slightly prolonged small bowel TTs. However, DM treated with insulin is a significant risk factor for inadequate bowel preparation, suggesting the need for a more intensive preparation protocol within this patient group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"26317745251359459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329204/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745251359459\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745251359459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在糖尿病(DM)中经常观察到的胃肠传递时间(TT)延迟可能会影响肠准备质量和视频胶囊内镜(VCE)的可视化。目的:研究目的是比较患有和不患有dm的患者之间的VCE准备充分性和完成率。设计:对前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性分析,包括在年龄大于或等于35岁的患者中进行的所有连续VCE。方法:根据入院时报告的糖尿病诊断和用药记录将患者分为两组。比较两组间的临床人口学特征、肠准备质量、TTs和完成率。进行Logistic回归分析以确定肠道准备不足的独立危险因素。结果:在纳入的672例vce中,189例(28.1%)为糖尿病患者,483例(71.9%)为对照组。完成率具有可比性(DM-98.4% vs对照组-99.0%,p = 0.553)。胃TT相似(DM-37.5±45.5 vs对照组-34.3±48.6 min, p = 0.420),而小肠TT更长(DM-261.8±95.6 vs对照组-244.9±98.4 min, p = 0.040)。糖尿病患者的准备不足率更高(31.2% vs对照组23.4%,p = 0.040)。在一项调整了年龄和性别的多变量分析中,糖尿病与准备不足没有独立关联。然而,胰岛素治疗糖尿病(26.5%的糖尿病患者)与肠道准备不足显著相关(优势比(OR) 2.355, p = 0.006)。与非糖尿病对照组相比,胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的使用(11.8%的糖尿病患者)达到了临界显著性,作为准备不足的危险因素(OR 2.148, 95% CI 0.887-5.201, p = 0.090)。结论:VCE在糖尿病患者中似乎是可行的,尽管小肠TTs稍微延长,但其完成率和胃TTs相似。然而,胰岛素治疗糖尿病是肠道准备不足的重要危险因素,这表明需要在该患者组中制定更严格的准备方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating video capsule endoscopy in diabetes mellitus: transit times, preparation adequacy, and the influence of insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist use.

Evaluating video capsule endoscopy in diabetes mellitus: transit times, preparation adequacy, and the influence of insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist use.

Evaluating video capsule endoscopy in diabetes mellitus: transit times, preparation adequacy, and the influence of insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist use.

Evaluating video capsule endoscopy in diabetes mellitus: transit times, preparation adequacy, and the influence of insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist use.

Evaluating video capsule endoscopy in diabetes mellitus: transit times, preparation adequacy, and the influence of insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist use.

Evaluating video capsule endoscopy in diabetes mellitus: transit times, preparation adequacy, and the influence of insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist use.

Evaluating video capsule endoscopy in diabetes mellitus: transit times, preparation adequacy, and the influence of insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist use.

Background: Delayed gastrointestinal transit time (TT), frequently observed in diabetes mellitus (DM), may hinder bowel preparation quality and visualization in video capsule endoscopy (VCE).

Objectives: The study aim was to compare VCE preparation adequacy and completion rates between patients with and without DM.

Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database, including all consecutive VCEs performed in patients aged ⩾35 years.

Methods: Patients were divided into two groups based on a DM diagnosis reported at admission and confirmed by medication records. Clinico-demographic characteristics, bowel preparation quality, TTs, and completion rates were compared between the groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation.

Results: Out of 672 included VCEs, 189 (28.1%) patients had DM and 483 (71.9%) were controls. Completion rates were comparable (DM-98.4% vs controls-99.0%, p = 0.553). Gastric TT was similar (DM-37.5 ± 45.5 vs controls-34.3± 48.6 min, p = 0.420), while small bowel TT was longer (DM-261.8 ± 95.6 vs controls-244.9 ± 98.4 min, p = 0.040). DM patients had higher inadequate preparation rates (31.2% vs controls-23.4%, p = 0.040). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for age and gender, DM was not independently associated with inadequate preparation. However, DM treated with insulin (26.5% of patients with DM) was significantly associated with inadequate bowel preparation (Odds ratio (OR) 2.355, p = 0.006). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist usage (11.8% of patients with DM patients) compared to no-DM controls achieved borderline significance as a risk factor for preparation inadequacy (OR 2.148, 95% CI 0.887-5.201, p = 0.090).

Conclusion: VCE appears to be feasible in patients with DM, with similar completion rates and gastric TTs despite slightly prolonged small bowel TTs. However, DM treated with insulin is a significant risk factor for inadequate bowel preparation, suggesting the need for a more intensive preparation protocol within this patient group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信