印度的公民社会被边缘化了。作为关系过程的城市空间。

IF 0.9 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Margit van Wessel, Rita Manchanda, Nandini Deo
{"title":"印度的公民社会被边缘化了。作为关系过程的城市空间。","authors":"Margit van Wessel, Rita Manchanda, Nandini Deo","doi":"10.1080/17448689.2025.2515038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Restriction of civic space is widely understood as a condition that constrains the autonomous role of civil society organizations. However, this conceptualization is delimiting. This paper explores civic space as constituted in the dynamics between civil society organizations and state actors, contributing to an emergent shift to a more processual, relational and agential understanding of civic space, involving a redefining of civil society roles by state and civil society actors acting and reacting within their everyday work. We explore the case of India. Based on 36 interviews with state and civil society actors, the paper. shows how the state marginalizes civil society through three pathways: delegitimation, displacement and repurposing. A fourth pattern, however, qualifies this marginalization: political roles for civil society continue to be sought and found, depending on situations and the specific actors involved, based on their interpretations and political advantages at stake for them. The broader significance of these findings is, first, that everyday understanding and experience of civic space may prominently revolve around changes in civil society roles. Second, these changes in roles may best be understood at the level of concrete cases of relating and political contention, doing justice to the agency of the actors involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":46013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How civil society in India is marginalized. Civic space as relational process.\",\"authors\":\"Margit van Wessel, Rita Manchanda, Nandini Deo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17448689.2025.2515038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Restriction of civic space is widely understood as a condition that constrains the autonomous role of civil society organizations. However, this conceptualization is delimiting. This paper explores civic space as constituted in the dynamics between civil society organizations and state actors, contributing to an emergent shift to a more processual, relational and agential understanding of civic space, involving a redefining of civil society roles by state and civil society actors acting and reacting within their everyday work. We explore the case of India. Based on 36 interviews with state and civil society actors, the paper. shows how the state marginalizes civil society through three pathways: delegitimation, displacement and repurposing. A fourth pattern, however, qualifies this marginalization: political roles for civil society continue to be sought and found, depending on situations and the specific actors involved, based on their interpretations and political advantages at stake for them. The broader significance of these findings is, first, that everyday understanding and experience of civic space may prominently revolve around changes in civil society roles. Second, these changes in roles may best be understood at the level of concrete cases of relating and political contention, doing justice to the agency of the actors involved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Civil Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327266/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Civil Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2025.2515038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2025.2515038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对公民空间的限制被广泛理解为限制公民社会组织自治作用的条件。然而,这种概念化是划界的。本文探讨了公民空间在公民社会组织和国家行为体之间的动态构成,有助于对公民空间进行更具程序性、关系性和能动性的理解,包括通过国家和公民社会行为体在日常工作中的行为和反应来重新定义公民社会角色。我们探讨了印度的情况。基于对36位国家和民间社会行动者的采访,该论文。展示了国家如何通过三种途径将公民社会边缘化:剥夺合法性、流离失所和重新利用。然而,第四种模式符合这种边缘化:根据情况和有关的具体行动者,根据他们的解释和对他们的政治利益的利害关系,继续寻求和发现民间社会的政治作用。这些发现的更广泛意义在于,首先,对公民空间的日常理解和经验可能显著地围绕着公民社会角色的变化。其次,这些角色的变化可能最好是在相关和政治争论的具体案例的层面上理解,公正地对待所涉及的行动者的代理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How civil society in India is marginalized. Civic space as relational process.

Restriction of civic space is widely understood as a condition that constrains the autonomous role of civil society organizations. However, this conceptualization is delimiting. This paper explores civic space as constituted in the dynamics between civil society organizations and state actors, contributing to an emergent shift to a more processual, relational and agential understanding of civic space, involving a redefining of civil society roles by state and civil society actors acting and reacting within their everyday work. We explore the case of India. Based on 36 interviews with state and civil society actors, the paper. shows how the state marginalizes civil society through three pathways: delegitimation, displacement and repurposing. A fourth pattern, however, qualifies this marginalization: political roles for civil society continue to be sought and found, depending on situations and the specific actors involved, based on their interpretations and political advantages at stake for them. The broader significance of these findings is, first, that everyday understanding and experience of civic space may prominently revolve around changes in civil society roles. Second, these changes in roles may best be understood at the level of concrete cases of relating and political contention, doing justice to the agency of the actors involved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Civil Society
Journal of Civil Society POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信