注册或随机化——这是证据还是巧合?

IF 1.2 Q2 SURGERY
Innovative Surgical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1515/iss-2022-0028
Olga Radulova, Florian Oehme, Sandra Korn, Christian Praetorius, Marius Distler, Jürgen Weitz
{"title":"注册或随机化——这是证据还是巧合?","authors":"Olga Radulova, Florian Oehme, Sandra Korn, Christian Praetorius, Marius Distler, Jürgen Weitz","doi":"10.1515/iss-2022-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the years, clinical registries and randomized controlled trials gained acceptance. With increasing experience, it was possible to obtain knowledge of benefits and limitations in both designs. During the last years, the research focus was placed on new study concepts such as register-based randomized controlled trials intending to merge the benefits of evidence obtained by RCTs and clinical registers. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the evolution and the present stage of clinical trials. While doing so, we outline past experience and look ahead toward improving models for high-quality clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":44186,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Surgical Sciences","volume":"10 2","pages":"65-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Registry or randomization - must it be evidence or could it be coincidence?\",\"authors\":\"Olga Radulova, Florian Oehme, Sandra Korn, Christian Praetorius, Marius Distler, Jürgen Weitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/iss-2022-0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Over the years, clinical registries and randomized controlled trials gained acceptance. With increasing experience, it was possible to obtain knowledge of benefits and limitations in both designs. During the last years, the research focus was placed on new study concepts such as register-based randomized controlled trials intending to merge the benefits of evidence obtained by RCTs and clinical registers. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the evolution and the present stage of clinical trials. While doing so, we outline past experience and look ahead toward improving models for high-quality clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovative Surgical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"65-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327714/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovative Surgical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2022-0028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2022-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多年来,临床登记和随机对照试验获得了认可。随着经验的增加,有可能了解到这两种设计的优点和局限性。在过去的几年里,研究的重点放在了新的研究概念上,如基于注册的随机对照试验,旨在将随机对照试验和临床注册获得的证据的好处结合起来。在这篇综述中,我们的目的是提供一个发展和目前阶段的临床试验的概述。在此过程中,我们概述了过去的经验,并展望了高质量临床试验的改进模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Registry or randomization - must it be evidence or could it be coincidence?

Registry or randomization - must it be evidence or could it be coincidence?

Registry or randomization - must it be evidence or could it be coincidence?

Over the years, clinical registries and randomized controlled trials gained acceptance. With increasing experience, it was possible to obtain knowledge of benefits and limitations in both designs. During the last years, the research focus was placed on new study concepts such as register-based randomized controlled trials intending to merge the benefits of evidence obtained by RCTs and clinical registers. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the evolution and the present stage of clinical trials. While doing so, we outline past experience and look ahead toward improving models for high-quality clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信