南非助产士对延迟脐带夹紧的好处的了解。

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Akhona Shosha, Wanda Jacobs, Zelda Janse van Rensburg
{"title":"南非助产士对延迟脐带夹紧的好处的了解。","authors":"Akhona Shosha, Wanda Jacobs, Zelda Janse van Rensburg","doi":"10.4102/safp.v67i1.6154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>  Background: Immediate umbilical cord clamping has been part of the active management of the third stage of labour for centuries. Despite the benefits of delayed cord clamping, immediate cord clamping remains the routine practice in many countries, including South Africa. The aim of this study was to determine South African midwives' knowledge of the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Employing a quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional design, 150 midwives from three Midwifery Obstetric Units (MOUs) in a district in one South African province were sampled through a stratified sampling method to complete the survey with an adapted self-administered questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The majority of midwives lacked knowledge of the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping or were unsure of their knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> There is documented evidence on the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping for both mother and newborn. Midwives who participated in the research lacked knowledge of these benefits. Identification of the knowledge deficits of midwives regarding the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping may inform future midwifery education pertaining to delayed umbilical cord clamping and its benefits and may improve the practice thereof. Contribution: This is the first study in South Africa to report on midwives' knowledge of the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping.</p>","PeriodicalId":22040,"journal":{"name":"South African Family Practice","volume":"67 1","pages":"e1-e8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"South African midwives' knowledge of the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping.\",\"authors\":\"Akhona Shosha, Wanda Jacobs, Zelda Janse van Rensburg\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/safp.v67i1.6154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>  Background: Immediate umbilical cord clamping has been part of the active management of the third stage of labour for centuries. Despite the benefits of delayed cord clamping, immediate cord clamping remains the routine practice in many countries, including South Africa. The aim of this study was to determine South African midwives' knowledge of the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Employing a quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional design, 150 midwives from three Midwifery Obstetric Units (MOUs) in a district in one South African province were sampled through a stratified sampling method to complete the survey with an adapted self-administered questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The majority of midwives lacked knowledge of the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping or were unsure of their knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> There is documented evidence on the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping for both mother and newborn. Midwives who participated in the research lacked knowledge of these benefits. Identification of the knowledge deficits of midwives regarding the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping may inform future midwifery education pertaining to delayed umbilical cord clamping and its benefits and may improve the practice thereof. Contribution: This is the first study in South Africa to report on midwives' knowledge of the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Family Practice\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-e8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421472/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Family Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v67i1.6154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Family Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v67i1.6154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:几个世纪以来,即时脐带夹紧一直是分娩第三阶段积极管理的一部分。尽管延迟夹紧脐带有好处,但在包括南非在内的许多国家,立即夹紧脐带仍然是常规做法。本研究的目的是确定南非助产士对延迟脐带夹紧的好处的了解。方法:采用定量、描述性、横断面设计,通过分层抽样方法对来自南非一个省一个地区的三个助产产科单位(MOUs)的150名助产士进行抽样,并使用自填问卷完成调查。结果:大多数助产士缺乏对延迟脐带夹的好处的了解或不确定他们的知识。结论:有文献证据表明延迟脐带夹紧对母亲和新生儿都有好处。参与研究的助产士缺乏对这些好处的了解。确定助产士关于延迟脐带夹紧的好处的知识缺陷,可以为未来有关延迟脐带夹紧及其好处的助产教育提供信息,并可以改进其实践。贡献:这是南非第一项报告助产士对延迟脐带夹的益处的了解的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
South African midwives' knowledge of the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping.

  Background: Immediate umbilical cord clamping has been part of the active management of the third stage of labour for centuries. Despite the benefits of delayed cord clamping, immediate cord clamping remains the routine practice in many countries, including South Africa. The aim of this study was to determine South African midwives' knowledge of the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping.

Methods:  Employing a quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional design, 150 midwives from three Midwifery Obstetric Units (MOUs) in a district in one South African province were sampled through a stratified sampling method to complete the survey with an adapted self-administered questionnaire.

Results:  The majority of midwives lacked knowledge of the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping or were unsure of their knowledge.

Conclusion:  There is documented evidence on the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping for both mother and newborn. Midwives who participated in the research lacked knowledge of these benefits. Identification of the knowledge deficits of midwives regarding the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping may inform future midwifery education pertaining to delayed umbilical cord clamping and its benefits and may improve the practice thereof. Contribution: This is the first study in South Africa to report on midwives' knowledge of the benefits of delayed umbilical cord clamping.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Family Practice
South African Family Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: South African Family Practice (SAFP) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which strives to provide primary care physicians and researchers with a broad range of scholarly work in the disciplines of Family Medicine, Primary Health Care, Rural Medicine, District Health and other related fields. SAFP publishes original research, clinical reviews, and pertinent commentary that advance the knowledge base of these disciplines. The content of SAFP is designed to reflect and support further development of the broad basis of these disciplines through original research and critical review of evidence in important clinical areas; as well as to provide practitioners with continuing professional development material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信