从2013年到2022年,美国建立了8个PICU随访项目:来自PICU后儿科结局研究的报告。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003804
Leslie A Dervan, Mary Hartman, Ericka L Fink, Julie C Fitzgerald, Trevor A Hall, Krista Laux, Lindsey A Morgan, Sarah Murphy, Neethi P Pinto, Elisabeth Schrock, Jane E Whitney, Cydni N Williams, Elizabeth Y Killien
{"title":"从2013年到2022年,美国建立了8个PICU随访项目:来自PICU后儿科结局研究的报告。","authors":"Leslie A Dervan, Mary Hartman, Ericka L Fink, Julie C Fitzgerald, Trevor A Hall, Krista Laux, Lindsey A Morgan, Sarah Murphy, Neethi P Pinto, Elisabeth Schrock, Jane E Whitney, Cydni N Williams, Elizabeth Y Killien","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Children surviving critical illness are at risk for new morbidities collectively termed \"post-intensive care syndrome-pediatrics\" (PICS-p). Because PICU teams are familiar with PICS-p and motivated to improve patient outcomes, intensivists are ideally positioned to improve access to PICU follow-up care. We aimed to describe various models of care developed by existing U.S. PICU follow-up programs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The Pediatric Outcomes Studies after PICU (POST-PICU) subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators network convened a virtual meeting with presentations and discussion by 11 leaders of eight follow-up programs, structured using input from the 125 POST-PICU members including advance questions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ninety-minute virtual meeting, September 2024. We recorded and transcribed the presentations and discussion to draft this report.</p><p><strong>Panel proceedings: </strong>Each leader presented their program and participated in discussion, organized into three domains based on the provided questions: 1) the program's target population and interventions; 2) program administration and funding; and 3) program outcomes. Each program aimed to identify patients considered at-risk for physiologic, neurologic, and/or psychologic PICU sequelae and to provide screening, referral to supportive or specialist services as indicated, and collaboration with their existing healthcare teams. Funding influenced program structure and processes. Many programs provided clinical services alongside services tied to research efforts. Tracking program outcomes helped programs advocate for long-term funding and institutional support. Panelists described their programs as providing \"wraparound care,\" \"transition care,\" and \"connection\"-supporting patients and families through different stages of the PICU and hospital stay, rehabilitation, and transition to home care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This information can support PICU teams in developing infrastructure to provide clinically indicated education, screening, and support for their patients, as the PICU community engages in further research and advocacy to improve access to PICU follow-up care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e1296-e1306"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eight PICU Follow-Up Programs in the United States Established From 2013 to 2022: Report From the Pediatric Outcomes Studies After PICU (POST-PICU) Investigators.\",\"authors\":\"Leslie A Dervan, Mary Hartman, Ericka L Fink, Julie C Fitzgerald, Trevor A Hall, Krista Laux, Lindsey A Morgan, Sarah Murphy, Neethi P Pinto, Elisabeth Schrock, Jane E Whitney, Cydni N Williams, Elizabeth Y Killien\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Children surviving critical illness are at risk for new morbidities collectively termed \\\"post-intensive care syndrome-pediatrics\\\" (PICS-p). Because PICU teams are familiar with PICS-p and motivated to improve patient outcomes, intensivists are ideally positioned to improve access to PICU follow-up care. We aimed to describe various models of care developed by existing U.S. PICU follow-up programs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The Pediatric Outcomes Studies after PICU (POST-PICU) subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators network convened a virtual meeting with presentations and discussion by 11 leaders of eight follow-up programs, structured using input from the 125 POST-PICU members including advance questions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ninety-minute virtual meeting, September 2024. We recorded and transcribed the presentations and discussion to draft this report.</p><p><strong>Panel proceedings: </strong>Each leader presented their program and participated in discussion, organized into three domains based on the provided questions: 1) the program's target population and interventions; 2) program administration and funding; and 3) program outcomes. Each program aimed to identify patients considered at-risk for physiologic, neurologic, and/or psychologic PICU sequelae and to provide screening, referral to supportive or specialist services as indicated, and collaboration with their existing healthcare teams. Funding influenced program structure and processes. Many programs provided clinical services alongside services tied to research efforts. Tracking program outcomes helped programs advocate for long-term funding and institutional support. Panelists described their programs as providing \\\"wraparound care,\\\" \\\"transition care,\\\" and \\\"connection\\\"-supporting patients and families through different stages of the PICU and hospital stay, rehabilitation, and transition to home care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This information can support PICU teams in developing infrastructure to provide clinically indicated education, screening, and support for their patients, as the PICU community engages in further research and advocacy to improve access to PICU follow-up care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1296-e1306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003804\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003804","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在危重疾病中幸存的儿童面临着统称为“重症监护后综合征-儿科”(PICS-p)的新发病风险。由于PICU团队熟悉PICS-p并积极改善患者预后,重症监护医师处于改善PICU随访护理的理想位置。我们的目的是描述现有的美国PICU随访计划开发的各种护理模式。设计:儿童急性肺损伤和败血症调查员网络的儿童PICU后结局研究(POST-PICU)亚组召集了一个虚拟会议,由8个随访项目的11位负责人进行了演讲和讨论,该会议使用了125名PICU后成员的输入,包括预先问题。设定:90分钟的虚拟会议,2024年9月。为了起草这份报告,我们对演讲和讨论进行了录音和转录。小组讨论:每位领导介绍了他们的计划并参与讨论,根据提供的问题分为三个领域:1)计划的目标人群和干预措施;2)项目管理和资助;3)项目成果。每个项目旨在识别被认为有生理、神经和/或心理PICU后遗症风险的患者,并提供筛查、转介到支持或专科服务,以及与现有医疗团队合作。资金影响了项目结构和流程。许多项目除了提供与研究工作相关的服务外,还提供临床服务。跟踪项目成果有助于项目争取长期资金和机构支持。小组成员将他们的项目描述为提供“全面护理”、“过渡护理”和“联系”——在重症监护病房、住院、康复和过渡到家庭护理的不同阶段为患者和家庭提供支持。结论:这些信息可以支持PICU团队开发基础设施,为患者提供临床指征教育、筛查和支持,同时PICU社区进一步研究和倡导改善PICU随访护理的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eight PICU Follow-Up Programs in the United States Established From 2013 to 2022: Report From the Pediatric Outcomes Studies After PICU (POST-PICU) Investigators.

Objectives: Children surviving critical illness are at risk for new morbidities collectively termed "post-intensive care syndrome-pediatrics" (PICS-p). Because PICU teams are familiar with PICS-p and motivated to improve patient outcomes, intensivists are ideally positioned to improve access to PICU follow-up care. We aimed to describe various models of care developed by existing U.S. PICU follow-up programs.

Design: The Pediatric Outcomes Studies after PICU (POST-PICU) subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators network convened a virtual meeting with presentations and discussion by 11 leaders of eight follow-up programs, structured using input from the 125 POST-PICU members including advance questions.

Setting: Ninety-minute virtual meeting, September 2024. We recorded and transcribed the presentations and discussion to draft this report.

Panel proceedings: Each leader presented their program and participated in discussion, organized into three domains based on the provided questions: 1) the program's target population and interventions; 2) program administration and funding; and 3) program outcomes. Each program aimed to identify patients considered at-risk for physiologic, neurologic, and/or psychologic PICU sequelae and to provide screening, referral to supportive or specialist services as indicated, and collaboration with their existing healthcare teams. Funding influenced program structure and processes. Many programs provided clinical services alongside services tied to research efforts. Tracking program outcomes helped programs advocate for long-term funding and institutional support. Panelists described their programs as providing "wraparound care," "transition care," and "connection"-supporting patients and families through different stages of the PICU and hospital stay, rehabilitation, and transition to home care.

Conclusions: This information can support PICU teams in developing infrastructure to provide clinically indicated education, screening, and support for their patients, as the PICU community engages in further research and advocacy to improve access to PICU follow-up care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信