Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Luis Carlos Venegas-Sanabria, Antonio Pesce, Alejandro González-Muñoz, Isabella Van-Londoño, Andrés Isaza-Restrepo
{"title":"肌减少症对胃肠道癌症患者预后的影响:对已发表meta分析的综述","authors":"Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Luis Carlos Venegas-Sanabria, Antonio Pesce, Alejandro González-Muñoz, Isabella Van-Londoño, Andrés Isaza-Restrepo","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01290-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal tumors represent a significant proportion of malignant neoplasms worldwide. Sarcopenia has emerged as a clinically relevant prognostic factor. Defined as the progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, sarcopenia has been associated with adverse outcomes in oncological patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an umbrella review of accumulated evidence to evaluate sarcopenia as a risk factor for major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) and overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three studies were included. Among the 29 studies that reported major complications, 19 studies (65.51%) identified sarcopenia as a risk factor, while the others did not find a statistically significant difference in the overall effect. Strong evidence (Class II) indicated that sarcopenia is associated with an increased risk of major complications (eOR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.40-1.75). Conversely, 56 of the included studies reported overall survival as the primary outcome of interest, with 52 (92.85%) identifying sarcopenia as a risk factor for reduced survival. Strong evidence (Class II) supports that sarcopenia is linked to reduced survival (eOR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.71-1.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This umbrella review of accumulated evidence demonstrates that sarcopenia is a highly suggestive risk factor for major postoperative complications and reduced overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal tumors. Consequently, the identification of sarcopenia in this patient population should prompt the implementation of preventive and therapeutic interventions aimed at improving clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Sarcopenia on Patient Outcomes in Gastrointestinal Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Published Meta-Analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Luis Carlos Venegas-Sanabria, Antonio Pesce, Alejandro González-Muñoz, Isabella Van-Londoño, Andrés Isaza-Restrepo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12029-025-01290-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal tumors represent a significant proportion of malignant neoplasms worldwide. Sarcopenia has emerged as a clinically relevant prognostic factor. Defined as the progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, sarcopenia has been associated with adverse outcomes in oncological patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an umbrella review of accumulated evidence to evaluate sarcopenia as a risk factor for major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) and overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three studies were included. Among the 29 studies that reported major complications, 19 studies (65.51%) identified sarcopenia as a risk factor, while the others did not find a statistically significant difference in the overall effect. Strong evidence (Class II) indicated that sarcopenia is associated with an increased risk of major complications (eOR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.40-1.75). Conversely, 56 of the included studies reported overall survival as the primary outcome of interest, with 52 (92.85%) identifying sarcopenia as a risk factor for reduced survival. Strong evidence (Class II) supports that sarcopenia is linked to reduced survival (eOR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.71-1.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This umbrella review of accumulated evidence demonstrates that sarcopenia is a highly suggestive risk factor for major postoperative complications and reduced overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal tumors. Consequently, the identification of sarcopenia in this patient population should prompt the implementation of preventive and therapeutic interventions aimed at improving clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01290-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01290-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:胃肠道肿瘤在全球恶性肿瘤中占很大比例。肌少症已成为临床相关的预后因素。骨骼肌减少症被定义为骨骼肌质量和功能的进行性和广泛性丧失,与肿瘤患者的不良结局有关。方法:我们对积累的证据进行了全面的回顾,以评估肌肉减少症是胃肠道癌症患者主要并发症(Clavien-Dindo≥3)和总生存期的危险因素。按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,对PubMed和Embase进行了系统搜索。结果:共纳入63项研究。在29项报告了主要并发症的研究中,有19项研究(65.51%)将肌肉减少症确定为危险因素,而其他研究在总体效果上没有发现统计学差异。强有力的证据(II类)表明,肌肉减少症与主要并发症的风险增加相关(eOR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.40-1.75)。相反,56项纳入的研究将总生存期作为主要终点,52项(92.85%)将肌肉减少症确定为降低生存期的危险因素。强有力的证据(II类)支持肌肉减少症与生存率降低有关(eOR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.71-1.88)。结论:对积累证据的综述表明,肌肉减少症是胃肠道肿瘤患者术后主要并发症和总生存率降低的一个高度提示的危险因素。因此,在这一患者群体中识别肌肉减少症应促使实施旨在改善临床结果的预防和治疗干预措施。
Effects of Sarcopenia on Patient Outcomes in Gastrointestinal Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Published Meta-Analyses.
Background: Gastrointestinal tumors represent a significant proportion of malignant neoplasms worldwide. Sarcopenia has emerged as a clinically relevant prognostic factor. Defined as the progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, sarcopenia has been associated with adverse outcomes in oncological patients.
Methods: We conducted an umbrella review of accumulated evidence to evaluate sarcopenia as a risk factor for major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) and overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
Results: Sixty-three studies were included. Among the 29 studies that reported major complications, 19 studies (65.51%) identified sarcopenia as a risk factor, while the others did not find a statistically significant difference in the overall effect. Strong evidence (Class II) indicated that sarcopenia is associated with an increased risk of major complications (eOR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.40-1.75). Conversely, 56 of the included studies reported overall survival as the primary outcome of interest, with 52 (92.85%) identifying sarcopenia as a risk factor for reduced survival. Strong evidence (Class II) supports that sarcopenia is linked to reduced survival (eOR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.71-1.88).
Conclusion: This umbrella review of accumulated evidence demonstrates that sarcopenia is a highly suggestive risk factor for major postoperative complications and reduced overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal tumors. Consequently, the identification of sarcopenia in this patient population should prompt the implementation of preventive and therapeutic interventions aimed at improving clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology: This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.