Julia L Kiefer, Kristin J Perry, Dustin E Sarver, Emily-Anne S Del Rosario, Lauren B Quetsch
{"title":"儿童-成人关系增强(CARE)培训对教育、行为和联合卫生专业人员的有用性的认识:对循证实践的态度。","authors":"Julia L Kiefer, Kristin J Perry, Dustin E Sarver, Emily-Anne S Del Rosario, Lauren B Quetsch","doi":"10.1007/s10880-025-10093-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement (CARE) is an evidence-informed approach to promote positive child-adult relationships in youth with behavior problems or traumatic stress. Implementing CARE in community settings may extend accessibility to evidence-based practices (EBP) for children in underserved areas. The present study examined health professionals' perceptions of CARE. Participants were 277 professionals from a statewide training initiative including early childhood educators (n = 178), allied health professionals (n = 48; speech, occupational, physical therapists), and behavioral health clinicians (n = 51) completing CARE training. Participants completed the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (Aarons (2004) Mental Health Services Research 6:61-74) (pre-training). Post-training, participants completed two scales created for this study which assessed participants perceptions of the training experience. Structural equation modeling evaluated differences in health professionals' perceptions of CARE and EBP. CARE was the most well received by allied health professionals, who reported greater favorability of EBP relative to behavioral health clinicians (0.12, 95% CI [.04, .24]). Additionally, results indicated greater favorability of EBP-mediated perceived usefulness (0.17, 95% CI [.07, .31]). CARE is a well-received training for professionals working with youth. Interprofessional training may enhance developmental and behavioral outcomes for youth, and our findings suggest particular receptivity to CARE by allied health professionals and implicate EBP favorability as a key driver.</p>","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement (CARE) Training Usefulness for Educational, Behavioral, and Allied Health Professionals: Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Practices.\",\"authors\":\"Julia L Kiefer, Kristin J Perry, Dustin E Sarver, Emily-Anne S Del Rosario, Lauren B Quetsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10880-025-10093-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement (CARE) is an evidence-informed approach to promote positive child-adult relationships in youth with behavior problems or traumatic stress. Implementing CARE in community settings may extend accessibility to evidence-based practices (EBP) for children in underserved areas. The present study examined health professionals' perceptions of CARE. Participants were 277 professionals from a statewide training initiative including early childhood educators (n = 178), allied health professionals (n = 48; speech, occupational, physical therapists), and behavioral health clinicians (n = 51) completing CARE training. Participants completed the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (Aarons (2004) Mental Health Services Research 6:61-74) (pre-training). Post-training, participants completed two scales created for this study which assessed participants perceptions of the training experience. Structural equation modeling evaluated differences in health professionals' perceptions of CARE and EBP. CARE was the most well received by allied health professionals, who reported greater favorability of EBP relative to behavioral health clinicians (0.12, 95% CI [.04, .24]). Additionally, results indicated greater favorability of EBP-mediated perceived usefulness (0.17, 95% CI [.07, .31]). CARE is a well-received training for professionals working with youth. Interprofessional training may enhance developmental and behavioral outcomes for youth, and our findings suggest particular receptivity to CARE by allied health professionals and implicate EBP favorability as a key driver.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-025-10093-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-025-10093-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perceptions of Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement (CARE) Training Usefulness for Educational, Behavioral, and Allied Health Professionals: Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Practices.
Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement (CARE) is an evidence-informed approach to promote positive child-adult relationships in youth with behavior problems or traumatic stress. Implementing CARE in community settings may extend accessibility to evidence-based practices (EBP) for children in underserved areas. The present study examined health professionals' perceptions of CARE. Participants were 277 professionals from a statewide training initiative including early childhood educators (n = 178), allied health professionals (n = 48; speech, occupational, physical therapists), and behavioral health clinicians (n = 51) completing CARE training. Participants completed the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (Aarons (2004) Mental Health Services Research 6:61-74) (pre-training). Post-training, participants completed two scales created for this study which assessed participants perceptions of the training experience. Structural equation modeling evaluated differences in health professionals' perceptions of CARE and EBP. CARE was the most well received by allied health professionals, who reported greater favorability of EBP relative to behavioral health clinicians (0.12, 95% CI [.04, .24]). Additionally, results indicated greater favorability of EBP-mediated perceived usefulness (0.17, 95% CI [.07, .31]). CARE is a well-received training for professionals working with youth. Interprofessional training may enhance developmental and behavioral outcomes for youth, and our findings suggest particular receptivity to CARE by allied health professionals and implicate EBP favorability as a key driver.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.