人工智能时代癌症患者的写照:生成式人工智能工具生成图像的内容分析。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou, Anna Gaysynsky, Nicole Senft Everson, Abigail Muro, Kristin Schrader, Irina Iles
{"title":"人工智能时代癌症患者的写照:生成式人工智能工具生成图像的内容分析。","authors":"Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou, Anna Gaysynsky, Nicole Senft Everson, Abigail Muro, Kristin Schrader, Irina Iles","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2537807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study sought to characterize images of cancer patients generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) text-to-image tools, and assess whether images differed by cancer type or AI tool, to elucidate the potential implications of using AI-generated images in health communication. Two generative AI-based tools, <i>DALL-E</i> and <i>Stable Diffusion</i>, were prompted to produce images of a \"cancer patient,\" \"breast cancer patient,\" \"lung cancer patient,\" and \"prostate cancer patient\". Images (<i>N</i> = 320) were coded for perceived demographics, illness features, affect, cancer symbols, setting, and photorealism. Analysis revealed that AI tools commonly depicted cancer patients as White (83.2%) and middle-aged or older (87.5%). Compared to general cancer patient images, breast cancer patients were portrayed as younger, while prostate and lung cancer patients were depicted as older. Breast cancer patients were also more frequently depicted as healthy and displaying positive affect, while lung cancer patients were more often depicted as ill and showing negative affect. Differences were also found between the AI tools, with <i>DALL-E</i> images featuring more racial diversity and being less photorealistic compared to images produced by <i>Stable Diffusion</i>. Because generative AI tools may produce images of cancer patients that are limited on some dimensions of diversity, and in some cases may reinforce stereotypes (eg, breast cancer patients as healthy and happy, lung cancer patients as ill and hopeless), it is critical to consider biases that may exist in these models - and the potential societal implications of using AI-generated images of cancer patients - before these tools are deployed in cancer communication efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Portrayal of Cancer Patients in the Era of AI: A Content Analysis of Images Produced by Generative AI Tools.\",\"authors\":\"Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou, Anna Gaysynsky, Nicole Senft Everson, Abigail Muro, Kristin Schrader, Irina Iles\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10410236.2025.2537807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study sought to characterize images of cancer patients generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) text-to-image tools, and assess whether images differed by cancer type or AI tool, to elucidate the potential implications of using AI-generated images in health communication. Two generative AI-based tools, <i>DALL-E</i> and <i>Stable Diffusion</i>, were prompted to produce images of a \\\"cancer patient,\\\" \\\"breast cancer patient,\\\" \\\"lung cancer patient,\\\" and \\\"prostate cancer patient\\\". Images (<i>N</i> = 320) were coded for perceived demographics, illness features, affect, cancer symbols, setting, and photorealism. Analysis revealed that AI tools commonly depicted cancer patients as White (83.2%) and middle-aged or older (87.5%). Compared to general cancer patient images, breast cancer patients were portrayed as younger, while prostate and lung cancer patients were depicted as older. Breast cancer patients were also more frequently depicted as healthy and displaying positive affect, while lung cancer patients were more often depicted as ill and showing negative affect. Differences were also found between the AI tools, with <i>DALL-E</i> images featuring more racial diversity and being less photorealistic compared to images produced by <i>Stable Diffusion</i>. Because generative AI tools may produce images of cancer patients that are limited on some dimensions of diversity, and in some cases may reinforce stereotypes (eg, breast cancer patients as healthy and happy, lung cancer patients as ill and hopeless), it is critical to consider biases that may exist in these models - and the potential societal implications of using AI-generated images of cancer patients - before these tools are deployed in cancer communication efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2537807\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2537807","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究试图描述由人工智能(AI)文本到图像工具生成的癌症患者图像的特征,并评估图像是否因癌症类型或人工智能工具而异,以阐明在健康交流中使用人工智能生成的图像的潜在影响。两个基于生成式人工智能的工具,DALL-E和Stable Diffusion,被提示生成“癌症患者”、“乳腺癌患者”、“肺癌患者”和“前列腺癌患者”的图像。图像(N = 320)根据感知的人口统计学、疾病特征、影响、癌症符号、环境和照片真实感进行编码。分析显示,人工智能工具通常将癌症患者描述为白人(83.2%)和中老年(87.5%)。与一般癌症患者的图像相比,乳腺癌患者被描绘得更年轻,而前列腺癌和肺癌患者被描绘得更年长。乳腺癌患者也更常被描述为健康的,表现出积极的影响,而肺癌患者更常被描述为生病的,表现出消极的影响。人工智能工具之间也存在差异,与Stable Diffusion产生的图像相比,DALL-E图像具有更多的种族多样性,并且不太逼真。由于生成式人工智能工具可能生成的癌症患者图像在某些多样性维度上受到限制,并且在某些情况下可能会强化刻板印象(例如,乳腺癌患者健康快乐,肺癌患者生病且无望),因此在将这些工具部署到癌症沟通工作之前,考虑这些模型中可能存在的偏见以及使用人工智能生成的癌症患者图像的潜在社会影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Portrayal of Cancer Patients in the Era of AI: A Content Analysis of Images Produced by Generative AI Tools.

This study sought to characterize images of cancer patients generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) text-to-image tools, and assess whether images differed by cancer type or AI tool, to elucidate the potential implications of using AI-generated images in health communication. Two generative AI-based tools, DALL-E and Stable Diffusion, were prompted to produce images of a "cancer patient," "breast cancer patient," "lung cancer patient," and "prostate cancer patient". Images (N = 320) were coded for perceived demographics, illness features, affect, cancer symbols, setting, and photorealism. Analysis revealed that AI tools commonly depicted cancer patients as White (83.2%) and middle-aged or older (87.5%). Compared to general cancer patient images, breast cancer patients were portrayed as younger, while prostate and lung cancer patients were depicted as older. Breast cancer patients were also more frequently depicted as healthy and displaying positive affect, while lung cancer patients were more often depicted as ill and showing negative affect. Differences were also found between the AI tools, with DALL-E images featuring more racial diversity and being less photorealistic compared to images produced by Stable Diffusion. Because generative AI tools may produce images of cancer patients that are limited on some dimensions of diversity, and in some cases may reinforce stereotypes (eg, breast cancer patients as healthy and happy, lung cancer patients as ill and hopeless), it is critical to consider biases that may exist in these models - and the potential societal implications of using AI-generated images of cancer patients - before these tools are deployed in cancer communication efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信