Alessandro Bertini, Alex Stephens, Alessio Finocchiaro, Silvia Viganò, Arjun Dinesh, Elnaz Guivatchian, Antonio Perri, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicolò Buffi, Ettore Di Trapani, Vincenzo Ficarra, Alberto Briganti, Andrea Salonia, Francesco Montorsi, Akshay Sood, Mani Menon, Craig Rogers, Firas Abdollah
{"title":"机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗病理上不受器官限制的高风险前列腺癌的长期癌症控制结果:来自单一三级转诊中心的20年报告。","authors":"Alessandro Bertini, Alex Stephens, Alessio Finocchiaro, Silvia Viganò, Arjun Dinesh, Elnaz Guivatchian, Antonio Perri, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicolò Buffi, Ettore Di Trapani, Vincenzo Ficarra, Alberto Briganti, Andrea Salonia, Francesco Montorsi, Akshay Sood, Mani Menon, Craig Rogers, Firas Abdollah","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Exhaustive evidence on the long-term efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in non-organ-confined high-risk prostate cancer (PC) is still lacking. Our aim was to evaluate long-term oncological outcomes in this subset of patients treated with RALP at a single referral center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 803 patients with pathologically non-organ-confined high-risk PC (≥pT3a and/or pN1) at RALP between 2001 and 2022 at Henry Ford Hospital (Detroit, MI, USA). All patient underwent RALP using the Vattikuti Institute technique, with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection (external iliac, obturator, and internal iliac nodes). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and additional treatment-free survival. The probability of PC-specific survival (PCSS) was estimated via the competing-risks method. Competing-risk and Cox regression analyses were used to identify potential predictors of PC-specific mortality (PCSM), any-cause mortality (ACM), and additional treatment.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>We included 803 patients, of whom 415 (51.5%) had pT3a, 385 (47.9%) had ≥pT3b, 323 (40%) had pN1, and 670 (84%) had grade group 4-5 PC. Of the 635 patients with status information regarding additional treatment, 416 received further therapy after surgery. Specifically, 46, 110, and 260 underwent RT only, HT only, or RT + HT, respectively. Median follow-up was 72 mo (interquartile range 28-120). The 20-yr survival rates were 72.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 56.8-86,5%) for PCSS and 45.2% (95% CI 29.1-60.1%) for OS. The rates of survival free from additional treatment were 31.3% (95% CI 26.1-36.5%) at 10 yr and 20.3% (95% CI 14.9-26.4%) at 15 yr. Multivariable regression revealed pT3b-4 stage as an independent predictor of PCSM (hazard ratio [HR] 2.50; p = 0.008), ACM (HR 1.84; p = 0.006), and additional treatment (HR 1.69; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>For patients with non-organ-confined high-risk PC, RALP achieves long-term oncological control. This study provides the longest follow-up after RALP as the primary local treatment for patients with truly aggressive PC forms and offers valuable insights for patient counseling on long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term Cancer Control Outcomes After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Pathologically Non-organ-confined High-risk Prostate Cancer: 20-year Report from a Single Tertiary Referral Center.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Bertini, Alex Stephens, Alessio Finocchiaro, Silvia Viganò, Arjun Dinesh, Elnaz Guivatchian, Antonio Perri, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicolò Buffi, Ettore Di Trapani, Vincenzo Ficarra, Alberto Briganti, Andrea Salonia, Francesco Montorsi, Akshay Sood, Mani Menon, Craig Rogers, Firas Abdollah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euf.2025.07.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Exhaustive evidence on the long-term efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in non-organ-confined high-risk prostate cancer (PC) is still lacking. Our aim was to evaluate long-term oncological outcomes in this subset of patients treated with RALP at a single referral center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 803 patients with pathologically non-organ-confined high-risk PC (≥pT3a and/or pN1) at RALP between 2001 and 2022 at Henry Ford Hospital (Detroit, MI, USA). All patient underwent RALP using the Vattikuti Institute technique, with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection (external iliac, obturator, and internal iliac nodes). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and additional treatment-free survival. The probability of PC-specific survival (PCSS) was estimated via the competing-risks method. Competing-risk and Cox regression analyses were used to identify potential predictors of PC-specific mortality (PCSM), any-cause mortality (ACM), and additional treatment.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>We included 803 patients, of whom 415 (51.5%) had pT3a, 385 (47.9%) had ≥pT3b, 323 (40%) had pN1, and 670 (84%) had grade group 4-5 PC. Of the 635 patients with status information regarding additional treatment, 416 received further therapy after surgery. Specifically, 46, 110, and 260 underwent RT only, HT only, or RT + HT, respectively. Median follow-up was 72 mo (interquartile range 28-120). The 20-yr survival rates were 72.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 56.8-86,5%) for PCSS and 45.2% (95% CI 29.1-60.1%) for OS. The rates of survival free from additional treatment were 31.3% (95% CI 26.1-36.5%) at 10 yr and 20.3% (95% CI 14.9-26.4%) at 15 yr. Multivariable regression revealed pT3b-4 stage as an independent predictor of PCSM (hazard ratio [HR] 2.50; p = 0.008), ACM (HR 1.84; p = 0.006), and additional treatment (HR 1.69; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>For patients with non-organ-confined high-risk PC, RALP achieves long-term oncological control. This study provides the longest follow-up after RALP as the primary local treatment for patients with truly aggressive PC forms and offers valuable insights for patient counseling on long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology focus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.07.007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.07.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term Cancer Control Outcomes After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Pathologically Non-organ-confined High-risk Prostate Cancer: 20-year Report from a Single Tertiary Referral Center.
Background and objective: Exhaustive evidence on the long-term efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in non-organ-confined high-risk prostate cancer (PC) is still lacking. Our aim was to evaluate long-term oncological outcomes in this subset of patients treated with RALP at a single referral center.
Methods: We included 803 patients with pathologically non-organ-confined high-risk PC (≥pT3a and/or pN1) at RALP between 2001 and 2022 at Henry Ford Hospital (Detroit, MI, USA). All patient underwent RALP using the Vattikuti Institute technique, with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection (external iliac, obturator, and internal iliac nodes). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and additional treatment-free survival. The probability of PC-specific survival (PCSS) was estimated via the competing-risks method. Competing-risk and Cox regression analyses were used to identify potential predictors of PC-specific mortality (PCSM), any-cause mortality (ACM), and additional treatment.
Key findings and limitations: We included 803 patients, of whom 415 (51.5%) had pT3a, 385 (47.9%) had ≥pT3b, 323 (40%) had pN1, and 670 (84%) had grade group 4-5 PC. Of the 635 patients with status information regarding additional treatment, 416 received further therapy after surgery. Specifically, 46, 110, and 260 underwent RT only, HT only, or RT + HT, respectively. Median follow-up was 72 mo (interquartile range 28-120). The 20-yr survival rates were 72.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 56.8-86,5%) for PCSS and 45.2% (95% CI 29.1-60.1%) for OS. The rates of survival free from additional treatment were 31.3% (95% CI 26.1-36.5%) at 10 yr and 20.3% (95% CI 14.9-26.4%) at 15 yr. Multivariable regression revealed pT3b-4 stage as an independent predictor of PCSM (hazard ratio [HR] 2.50; p = 0.008), ACM (HR 1.84; p = 0.006), and additional treatment (HR 1.69; p < 0.001).
Conclusions and clinical implications: For patients with non-organ-confined high-risk PC, RALP achieves long-term oncological control. This study provides the longest follow-up after RALP as the primary local treatment for patients with truly aggressive PC forms and offers valuable insights for patient counseling on long-term outcomes.
期刊介绍:
European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU).
EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.