服用抗精神病药物的精神病患者的代谢监测:一项质量改进项目的结果,以解决这一具有挑战性的指南-实践差距。

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yomen Al-Saati, Ethiraj Vijayakumar, Eefa Khan, Christine Leong, Jennifer Hensel, Nina Kuzenko
{"title":"服用抗精神病药物的精神病患者的代谢监测:一项质量改进项目的结果,以解决这一具有挑战性的指南-实践差距。","authors":"Yomen Al-Saati, Ethiraj Vijayakumar, Eefa Khan, Christine Leong, Jennifer Hensel, Nina Kuzenko","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metabolic adverse effects of antipsychotic medications pose significant health risks for patients with psychotic disorders. Despite clinical practice guidelines recommending regular metabolic monitoring, adherence to these recommendations remains suboptimal in psychiatric settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quality improvement project aimed to assess the impact of an organisational paper-based metabolic monitoring form (MMF) on monitoring practices for patients with psychotic disorders receiving antipsychotic medications at an outpatient psychiatric clinic in a large Canadian city.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-post intervention study was carried out to assess the impact of the MMF on annual monitoring among 75 randomly selected eligible patients. Metabolic monitoring parameters (blood pressure, weight, waist circumference and glucose and lipid profiles) were reviewed 1 year before and after the introduction of the form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MMF was missing from 10 charts, and despite its presence in the remainder, no improvement was observed in metabolic parameter documentation, and overall guideline adherence remained low. Fasting glucose and HbA1c measurements were most frequently ordered, while blood pressure and weight measurements remained consistently low across both periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of a paper-based MMF alone was insufficient to bridge the guideline-practice gap in metabolic monitoring, highlighting the need for other or concurrent strategies to achieve improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metabolic monitoring among patients with psychotic disorders taking antipsychotics: results of a quality improvement project to address this challenging guideline-practice gap.\",\"authors\":\"Yomen Al-Saati, Ethiraj Vijayakumar, Eefa Khan, Christine Leong, Jennifer Hensel, Nina Kuzenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metabolic adverse effects of antipsychotic medications pose significant health risks for patients with psychotic disorders. Despite clinical practice guidelines recommending regular metabolic monitoring, adherence to these recommendations remains suboptimal in psychiatric settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quality improvement project aimed to assess the impact of an organisational paper-based metabolic monitoring form (MMF) on monitoring practices for patients with psychotic disorders receiving antipsychotic medications at an outpatient psychiatric clinic in a large Canadian city.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-post intervention study was carried out to assess the impact of the MMF on annual monitoring among 75 randomly selected eligible patients. Metabolic monitoring parameters (blood pressure, weight, waist circumference and glucose and lipid profiles) were reviewed 1 year before and after the introduction of the form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MMF was missing from 10 charts, and despite its presence in the remainder, no improvement was observed in metabolic parameter documentation, and overall guideline adherence remained low. Fasting glucose and HbA1c measurements were most frequently ordered, while blood pressure and weight measurements remained consistently low across both periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of a paper-based MMF alone was insufficient to bridge the guideline-practice gap in metabolic monitoring, highlighting the need for other or concurrent strategies to achieve improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336612/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗精神病药物的代谢不良反应对精神障碍患者构成重大的健康风险。尽管临床实践指南建议定期监测代谢,但在精神病学设置中,坚持这些建议仍然不是最佳的。目的:本质量改进项目旨在评估组织纸质代谢监测表(MMF)对加拿大某大城市精神病门诊接受抗精神病药物治疗的精神病患者监测实践的影响。方法:对随机选取的75例符合条件的患者进行干预前后研究,评估MMF对年度监测的影响。代谢监测参数(血压、体重、腰围、血糖和血脂)在引入表格前后1年进行回顾。结果:MMF在10张图表中缺失,尽管在其余图表中存在,但在代谢参数文档中没有观察到改善,总体指南依从性仍然很低。空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白的测量是最频繁的,而血压和体重的测量在两个时期都保持在较低的水平。结论:仅实施基于纸张的MMF不足以弥补代谢监测指南与实践之间的差距,强调需要其他或并行策略来实现改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metabolic monitoring among patients with psychotic disorders taking antipsychotics: results of a quality improvement project to address this challenging guideline-practice gap.

Background: Metabolic adverse effects of antipsychotic medications pose significant health risks for patients with psychotic disorders. Despite clinical practice guidelines recommending regular metabolic monitoring, adherence to these recommendations remains suboptimal in psychiatric settings.

Objective: This quality improvement project aimed to assess the impact of an organisational paper-based metabolic monitoring form (MMF) on monitoring practices for patients with psychotic disorders receiving antipsychotic medications at an outpatient psychiatric clinic in a large Canadian city.

Methods: A pre-post intervention study was carried out to assess the impact of the MMF on annual monitoring among 75 randomly selected eligible patients. Metabolic monitoring parameters (blood pressure, weight, waist circumference and glucose and lipid profiles) were reviewed 1 year before and after the introduction of the form.

Results: The MMF was missing from 10 charts, and despite its presence in the remainder, no improvement was observed in metabolic parameter documentation, and overall guideline adherence remained low. Fasting glucose and HbA1c measurements were most frequently ordered, while blood pressure and weight measurements remained consistently low across both periods.

Conclusions: The implementation of a paper-based MMF alone was insufficient to bridge the guideline-practice gap in metabolic monitoring, highlighting the need for other or concurrent strategies to achieve improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信