Erica M Stringer-Reasor, Poornima Saha, Masha Kocherginsky, Ricardo Lastra, Gabrielle Baker, Ernst Lenygel, Theodore Karrison, Lauren Olalde, Elizabeth Mokrzycki, Olwen M Hahn, Philip C Hoffman, Suzanne D Conzen, Gini F Fleming, Rita Nanda
{"title":"卡铂、吉西他滨和米非司酮治疗晚期乳腺癌和复发性/持续性上皮性卵巢癌。","authors":"Erica M Stringer-Reasor, Poornima Saha, Masha Kocherginsky, Ricardo Lastra, Gabrielle Baker, Ernst Lenygel, Theodore Karrison, Lauren Olalde, Elizabeth Mokrzycki, Olwen M Hahn, Philip C Hoffman, Suzanne D Conzen, Gini F Fleming, Rita Nanda","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07783-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Preclinical models of glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-positive breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) suggest GR activity inhibits chemotherapy-induced apoptosis, and GR antagonism using mifepristone (Mif) enhances cytotoxicity. We performed a phase I trial combining mifepristone, carboplatin (C), gemcitabine (G).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standard \"3 + 3\" dose escalation scheme was used. Objectives were safety and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Mif + CG. CG was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, and mifepristone was administered orally the day before and day of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients enrolled with a median age of 54 years; the median prior metastatic regimens were one. Twenty-five patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) including 16 BC and 9 OC. Dose was de-escalated to dose level (DL) -1 due to 2/4 neutropenia-related DLT's. DLT definition was updated to exclude hematologic DLTs starting at DL-1. The dose was further de-escalated due to neutropenia, and 2/3, 1/4 and 0/6 patients experienced a DLT at DL-1, DL-2, and DL-3, respectively. At DL-1, prophylactic pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was instituted. Dose levels -1 and -2 were expanded to add 3 and 6 patients, respectively, to evaluate tolerability in dose levels -1a and -2a. There were 3 major responses (1CR, 2PR) at DL1, and 1 CR at DL-1. No responses were observed at lower levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MTD was carboplatin AUC 2 + gemcitabine 600 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on D1 and 8 with Mif 300 mg D-1 and D1 with pegylated G-CSF administered on day 9 of a 21-day cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"347-354"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carboplatin, gemcitabine, and mifepristone for advanced breast and recurrent/persistent epithelial ovarian cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Erica M Stringer-Reasor, Poornima Saha, Masha Kocherginsky, Ricardo Lastra, Gabrielle Baker, Ernst Lenygel, Theodore Karrison, Lauren Olalde, Elizabeth Mokrzycki, Olwen M Hahn, Philip C Hoffman, Suzanne D Conzen, Gini F Fleming, Rita Nanda\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-025-07783-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Preclinical models of glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-positive breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) suggest GR activity inhibits chemotherapy-induced apoptosis, and GR antagonism using mifepristone (Mif) enhances cytotoxicity. We performed a phase I trial combining mifepristone, carboplatin (C), gemcitabine (G).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standard \\\"3 + 3\\\" dose escalation scheme was used. Objectives were safety and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Mif + CG. CG was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, and mifepristone was administered orally the day before and day of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients enrolled with a median age of 54 years; the median prior metastatic regimens were one. Twenty-five patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) including 16 BC and 9 OC. Dose was de-escalated to dose level (DL) -1 due to 2/4 neutropenia-related DLT's. DLT definition was updated to exclude hematologic DLTs starting at DL-1. The dose was further de-escalated due to neutropenia, and 2/3, 1/4 and 0/6 patients experienced a DLT at DL-1, DL-2, and DL-3, respectively. At DL-1, prophylactic pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was instituted. Dose levels -1 and -2 were expanded to add 3 and 6 patients, respectively, to evaluate tolerability in dose levels -1a and -2a. There were 3 major responses (1CR, 2PR) at DL1, and 1 CR at DL-1. No responses were observed at lower levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MTD was carboplatin AUC 2 + gemcitabine 600 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on D1 and 8 with Mif 300 mg D-1 and D1 with pegylated G-CSF administered on day 9 of a 21-day cycle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"347-354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396977/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07783-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07783-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Carboplatin, gemcitabine, and mifepristone for advanced breast and recurrent/persistent epithelial ovarian cancer.
Purpose: Preclinical models of glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-positive breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) suggest GR activity inhibits chemotherapy-induced apoptosis, and GR antagonism using mifepristone (Mif) enhances cytotoxicity. We performed a phase I trial combining mifepristone, carboplatin (C), gemcitabine (G).
Methods: A standard "3 + 3" dose escalation scheme was used. Objectives were safety and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Mif + CG. CG was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, and mifepristone was administered orally the day before and day of chemotherapy.
Results: Thirty-one patients enrolled with a median age of 54 years; the median prior metastatic regimens were one. Twenty-five patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) including 16 BC and 9 OC. Dose was de-escalated to dose level (DL) -1 due to 2/4 neutropenia-related DLT's. DLT definition was updated to exclude hematologic DLTs starting at DL-1. The dose was further de-escalated due to neutropenia, and 2/3, 1/4 and 0/6 patients experienced a DLT at DL-1, DL-2, and DL-3, respectively. At DL-1, prophylactic pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was instituted. Dose levels -1 and -2 were expanded to add 3 and 6 patients, respectively, to evaluate tolerability in dose levels -1a and -2a. There were 3 major responses (1CR, 2PR) at DL1, and 1 CR at DL-1. No responses were observed at lower levels.
Conclusion: The MTD was carboplatin AUC 2 + gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 on D1 and 8 with Mif 300 mg D-1 and D1 with pegylated G-CSF administered on day 9 of a 21-day cycle.
期刊介绍:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.