ESR1多态性(XbaI和PvuII)与乳腺癌风险之间的关系:一项病例对照研究的综合meta分析

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1007/s10549-025-07800-9
Ishan Behlam, Amrit Sudershan, Indu Priya, Srishty Sudershan, Adesh K Saini, Ravi Sharma, Mohd Younis, Rachna Sabharwal, Pawan Kumar, Sunita Manhas, Parvinder Kumar
{"title":"ESR1多态性(XbaI和PvuII)与乳腺癌风险之间的关系:一项病例对照研究的综合meta分析","authors":"Ishan Behlam, Amrit Sudershan, Indu Priya, Srishty Sudershan, Adesh K Saini, Ravi Sharma, Mohd Younis, Rachna Sabharwal, Pawan Kumar, Sunita Manhas, Parvinder Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07800-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide with notable geographic variation in incidence and mortality. Its risk is shaped by both environmental and genetic factors. Among the genetic contributors, ESR1 intronic polymorphisms such as XbaI and PvuII have been associated with breast cancer susceptibility, though results across populations remain inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>In light of these discrepancies, the present study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the association between ESR1 polymorphisms (XbaI and PvuII) and breast cancer risk using a meta-analytical approach, with particular attention to ethnicity-based subgroup effects and methodological rigor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and Google Scholar. Twenty-six studies on XbaI and 28 on PvuII polymorphisms were included based on set criteria. Genotype and allele data were extracted, with study quality checked via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Studies deviating from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium were excluded. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated across multiple genetic models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I<sup>2</sup> and Cochran's Q tests, while Egger's and Begg's tests assessed publication bias. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meta-analysis of ESR1 XbaI showed no significant association with breast cancer risk across all genetic models (e.g., allelic OR = 0.9957; p = 0.898), including ethnic subgroups (African, Asian, Caucasian). Moderate heterogeneity was noted, but sensitivity and publication bias analyses confirmed result stability. Similarly, ESR1 PvuII showed no overall association (e.g., allelic OR = 0.9755; p = 0.406); however, significant associations emerged in Africans (e.g., dominant OR = 1.7992; p = 0.012), suggesting ethnic-specific susceptibility.</p><p><strong>Discussion & conclusion: </strong>While ESR1 XbaI and PvuII polymorphisms are not associated with overall breast cancer risk, the PvuII variant may influence susceptibility in African populations. These findings highlight the need for large, multi-ethnic studies with standardized methods to clarify population-specific genetic risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"131-148"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between ESR1 polymorphisms (XbaI & PvuII) and breast cancer risk: a comprehensive meta-analysis of case-control studies.\",\"authors\":\"Ishan Behlam, Amrit Sudershan, Indu Priya, Srishty Sudershan, Adesh K Saini, Ravi Sharma, Mohd Younis, Rachna Sabharwal, Pawan Kumar, Sunita Manhas, Parvinder Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-025-07800-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide with notable geographic variation in incidence and mortality. Its risk is shaped by both environmental and genetic factors. Among the genetic contributors, ESR1 intronic polymorphisms such as XbaI and PvuII have been associated with breast cancer susceptibility, though results across populations remain inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>In light of these discrepancies, the present study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the association between ESR1 polymorphisms (XbaI and PvuII) and breast cancer risk using a meta-analytical approach, with particular attention to ethnicity-based subgroup effects and methodological rigor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and Google Scholar. Twenty-six studies on XbaI and 28 on PvuII polymorphisms were included based on set criteria. Genotype and allele data were extracted, with study quality checked via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Studies deviating from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium were excluded. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated across multiple genetic models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I<sup>2</sup> and Cochran's Q tests, while Egger's and Begg's tests assessed publication bias. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meta-analysis of ESR1 XbaI showed no significant association with breast cancer risk across all genetic models (e.g., allelic OR = 0.9957; p = 0.898), including ethnic subgroups (African, Asian, Caucasian). Moderate heterogeneity was noted, but sensitivity and publication bias analyses confirmed result stability. Similarly, ESR1 PvuII showed no overall association (e.g., allelic OR = 0.9755; p = 0.406); however, significant associations emerged in Africans (e.g., dominant OR = 1.7992; p = 0.012), suggesting ethnic-specific susceptibility.</p><p><strong>Discussion & conclusion: </strong>While ESR1 XbaI and PvuII polymorphisms are not associated with overall breast cancer risk, the PvuII variant may influence susceptibility in African populations. These findings highlight the need for large, multi-ethnic studies with standardized methods to clarify population-specific genetic risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"131-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07800-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07800-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺癌是世界上最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,其发病率和死亡率存在显著的地理差异。其风险由环境和遗传因素共同决定。在遗传因素中,ESR1内含子多态性如XbaI和PvuII与乳腺癌易感性有关,尽管在人群中的结果仍然不一致。鉴于这些差异,本研究旨在使用荟萃分析方法全面评估ESR1多态性(XbaI和PvuII)与乳腺癌风险之间的关系,特别注意基于种族的亚组效应和方法的严谨性。方法:根据PRISMA指南使用PubMed、Semantic Scholar和谷歌Scholar进行系统评价。根据设定的标准纳入了26项XbaI多态性研究和28项PvuII多态性研究。提取基因型和等位基因数据,并通过纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表检查研究质量。偏离Hardy-Weinberg平衡的研究被排除在外。计算多个遗传模型的合并优势比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。异质性评估采用I2和Cochran的Q检验,而Egger和Begg的检验评估发表偏倚。敏感性分析检验了结果的稳健性。结果:荟萃分析显示,ESR1 XbaI与乳腺癌风险在所有遗传模型中均无显著相关性(例如,等位基因OR = 0.9957;p = 0.898),包括种族亚群(非洲人、亚洲人、高加索人)。注意到中度异质性,但敏感性和发表偏倚分析证实了结果的稳定性。同样,ESR1 PvuII也没有整体关联(例如,等位基因OR = 0.9755;p = 0.406);然而,在非洲人中出现了显著的关联(例如,显性OR = 1.7992;P = 0.012),提示种族特异性易感性。讨论与结论:虽然ESR1 XbaI和PvuII多态性与总体乳腺癌风险无关,但PvuII变异可能影响非洲人群的易感性。这些发现强调需要用标准化的方法进行大规模的多种族研究,以澄清特定人群的遗传风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between ESR1 polymorphisms (XbaI & PvuII) and breast cancer risk: a comprehensive meta-analysis of case-control studies.

Background: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide with notable geographic variation in incidence and mortality. Its risk is shaped by both environmental and genetic factors. Among the genetic contributors, ESR1 intronic polymorphisms such as XbaI and PvuII have been associated with breast cancer susceptibility, though results across populations remain inconsistent.

Aim: In light of these discrepancies, the present study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the association between ESR1 polymorphisms (XbaI and PvuII) and breast cancer risk using a meta-analytical approach, with particular attention to ethnicity-based subgroup effects and methodological rigor.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and Google Scholar. Twenty-six studies on XbaI and 28 on PvuII polymorphisms were included based on set criteria. Genotype and allele data were extracted, with study quality checked via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Studies deviating from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium were excluded. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated across multiple genetic models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 and Cochran's Q tests, while Egger's and Begg's tests assessed publication bias. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of results.

Results: Meta-analysis of ESR1 XbaI showed no significant association with breast cancer risk across all genetic models (e.g., allelic OR = 0.9957; p = 0.898), including ethnic subgroups (African, Asian, Caucasian). Moderate heterogeneity was noted, but sensitivity and publication bias analyses confirmed result stability. Similarly, ESR1 PvuII showed no overall association (e.g., allelic OR = 0.9755; p = 0.406); however, significant associations emerged in Africans (e.g., dominant OR = 1.7992; p = 0.012), suggesting ethnic-specific susceptibility.

Discussion & conclusion: While ESR1 XbaI and PvuII polymorphisms are not associated with overall breast cancer risk, the PvuII variant may influence susceptibility in African populations. These findings highlight the need for large, multi-ethnic studies with standardized methods to clarify population-specific genetic risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信