胃印戒细胞癌与腺癌的临床病理特征及蛋白表达比较。

IF 1.2
Jingwei Ma, Meng Zhu, Ning Zhang, Ningbo Huang, Xianyao Meng
{"title":"胃印戒细胞癌与腺癌的临床病理特征及蛋白表达比较。","authors":"Jingwei Ma, Meng Zhu, Ning Zhang, Ningbo Huang, Xianyao Meng","doi":"10.1097/PAI.0000000000001276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) exhibit distinct characteristics, yet a comprehensive comparison is lacking. In this retrospective study from 2020 to 2024, we analyzed 568 gastric cancer cases, including 216 SRCC and 352 ADC. In SRCC, MMR deficiencies were 3.2% for MLH1, 2.3% for PMS2, 0.5% for MSH2, with PMS2 deficiencies more prevalent in old patients and only one MSH2 deletions observed in cardia-involved cases. E-cadherin loss was 13.5%, predominantly in males and cases with nerve invasion, while Claudin18.2 positivity was 49.2%, particularly in early-stage patients. In ADC, MMR deficiencies were 8.5% for MLH1, 6.5% for PMS2, 0.3% for MSH6 and MSH2, with MLH1 and PMS2 deficiencies more common in females, old patients, and antrum-involved cases, and MSH2 deletions associated with larger tumors. E-cadherin loss was 5%, primarily in poorly differentiated and diffuse types, and Claudin18.2 positivity was 50.9%, especially in lymphatic metastasis patients. SRCC was more common in females and younger individuals, peaking 10 years earlier than ADC, which was significantly more prevalent in males. Both localized predominantly in the antrum. SRCC exhibited mucosa and serosa infiltration along with higher local metastasis, while ADC showed gradually increasing infiltration depth. MLH1 and PMS2 deficiencies were more common in ADC, while E-cadherin loss predominantly in SRCC. AB-PAS expression was higher in SRCC. Female and elderly were risk factors for MMR deficiencies in ADC, while female protected against E-cadherin loss in SRCC. These results highlight the need for tailored therapeutic approaches based on distinct molecular and clinical features.</p>","PeriodicalId":520562,"journal":{"name":"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma From Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Protein Expressions.\",\"authors\":\"Jingwei Ma, Meng Zhu, Ning Zhang, Ningbo Huang, Xianyao Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PAI.0000000000001276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) exhibit distinct characteristics, yet a comprehensive comparison is lacking. In this retrospective study from 2020 to 2024, we analyzed 568 gastric cancer cases, including 216 SRCC and 352 ADC. In SRCC, MMR deficiencies were 3.2% for MLH1, 2.3% for PMS2, 0.5% for MSH2, with PMS2 deficiencies more prevalent in old patients and only one MSH2 deletions observed in cardia-involved cases. E-cadherin loss was 13.5%, predominantly in males and cases with nerve invasion, while Claudin18.2 positivity was 49.2%, particularly in early-stage patients. In ADC, MMR deficiencies were 8.5% for MLH1, 6.5% for PMS2, 0.3% for MSH6 and MSH2, with MLH1 and PMS2 deficiencies more common in females, old patients, and antrum-involved cases, and MSH2 deletions associated with larger tumors. E-cadherin loss was 5%, primarily in poorly differentiated and diffuse types, and Claudin18.2 positivity was 50.9%, especially in lymphatic metastasis patients. SRCC was more common in females and younger individuals, peaking 10 years earlier than ADC, which was significantly more prevalent in males. Both localized predominantly in the antrum. SRCC exhibited mucosa and serosa infiltration along with higher local metastasis, while ADC showed gradually increasing infiltration depth. MLH1 and PMS2 deficiencies were more common in ADC, while E-cadherin loss predominantly in SRCC. AB-PAS expression was higher in SRCC. Female and elderly were risk factors for MMR deficiencies in ADC, while female protected against E-cadherin loss in SRCC. These results highlight the need for tailored therapeutic approaches based on distinct molecular and clinical features.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000001276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000001276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印戒细胞癌(SRCC)和腺癌(ADC)表现出不同的特征,但缺乏全面的比较。在这项2020 - 2024年的回顾性研究中,我们分析了568例胃癌病例,其中包括216例SRCC和352例ADC。在SRCC中,MLH1的MMR缺乏率为3.2%,PMS2为2.3%,MSH2为0.5%,PMS2缺乏症在老年患者中更为普遍,在心脏相关病例中仅观察到1例MSH2缺失。E-cadherin丢失为13.5%,主要发生在男性和神经侵犯病例中,而Claudin18.2阳性为49.2%,特别是在早期患者中。在ADC中,MLH1的MMR缺乏率为8.5%,PMS2为6.5%,MSH6和MSH2为0.3%,其中MLH1和PMS2缺乏症在女性、老年患者和累及上颌窦的病例中更为常见,MSH2缺失与较大的肿瘤有关。E-cadherin缺失率为5%,主要发生在低分化和弥散型患者中;Claudin18.2阳性率为50.9%,尤其是在淋巴转移患者中。SRCC在女性和年轻人中更为常见,比ADC早10年达到峰值,而ADC在男性中更为普遍。两者都主要局限于胃窦。SRCC表现为粘膜和浆膜浸润,局部转移率较高,而ADC表现为浸润深度逐渐增加。MLH1和PMS2缺陷在ADC中更为常见,而e -钙粘蛋白缺失主要发生在SRCC中。AB-PAS在SRCC中表达较高。女性和老年人是ADC中MMR缺乏的危险因素,而女性对SRCC中e -钙粘蛋白丢失有保护作用。这些结果强调了根据不同的分子和临床特征定制治疗方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma From Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Protein Expressions.

Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) exhibit distinct characteristics, yet a comprehensive comparison is lacking. In this retrospective study from 2020 to 2024, we analyzed 568 gastric cancer cases, including 216 SRCC and 352 ADC. In SRCC, MMR deficiencies were 3.2% for MLH1, 2.3% for PMS2, 0.5% for MSH2, with PMS2 deficiencies more prevalent in old patients and only one MSH2 deletions observed in cardia-involved cases. E-cadherin loss was 13.5%, predominantly in males and cases with nerve invasion, while Claudin18.2 positivity was 49.2%, particularly in early-stage patients. In ADC, MMR deficiencies were 8.5% for MLH1, 6.5% for PMS2, 0.3% for MSH6 and MSH2, with MLH1 and PMS2 deficiencies more common in females, old patients, and antrum-involved cases, and MSH2 deletions associated with larger tumors. E-cadherin loss was 5%, primarily in poorly differentiated and diffuse types, and Claudin18.2 positivity was 50.9%, especially in lymphatic metastasis patients. SRCC was more common in females and younger individuals, peaking 10 years earlier than ADC, which was significantly more prevalent in males. Both localized predominantly in the antrum. SRCC exhibited mucosa and serosa infiltration along with higher local metastasis, while ADC showed gradually increasing infiltration depth. MLH1 and PMS2 deficiencies were more common in ADC, while E-cadherin loss predominantly in SRCC. AB-PAS expression was higher in SRCC. Female and elderly were risk factors for MMR deficiencies in ADC, while female protected against E-cadherin loss in SRCC. These results highlight the need for tailored therapeutic approaches based on distinct molecular and clinical features.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信