Jingwei Ma, Meng Zhu, Ning Zhang, Ningbo Huang, Xianyao Meng
{"title":"胃印戒细胞癌与腺癌的临床病理特征及蛋白表达比较。","authors":"Jingwei Ma, Meng Zhu, Ning Zhang, Ningbo Huang, Xianyao Meng","doi":"10.1097/PAI.0000000000001276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) exhibit distinct characteristics, yet a comprehensive comparison is lacking. In this retrospective study from 2020 to 2024, we analyzed 568 gastric cancer cases, including 216 SRCC and 352 ADC. In SRCC, MMR deficiencies were 3.2% for MLH1, 2.3% for PMS2, 0.5% for MSH2, with PMS2 deficiencies more prevalent in old patients and only one MSH2 deletions observed in cardia-involved cases. E-cadherin loss was 13.5%, predominantly in males and cases with nerve invasion, while Claudin18.2 positivity was 49.2%, particularly in early-stage patients. In ADC, MMR deficiencies were 8.5% for MLH1, 6.5% for PMS2, 0.3% for MSH6 and MSH2, with MLH1 and PMS2 deficiencies more common in females, old patients, and antrum-involved cases, and MSH2 deletions associated with larger tumors. E-cadherin loss was 5%, primarily in poorly differentiated and diffuse types, and Claudin18.2 positivity was 50.9%, especially in lymphatic metastasis patients. SRCC was more common in females and younger individuals, peaking 10 years earlier than ADC, which was significantly more prevalent in males. Both localized predominantly in the antrum. SRCC exhibited mucosa and serosa infiltration along with higher local metastasis, while ADC showed gradually increasing infiltration depth. MLH1 and PMS2 deficiencies were more common in ADC, while E-cadherin loss predominantly in SRCC. AB-PAS expression was higher in SRCC. Female and elderly were risk factors for MMR deficiencies in ADC, while female protected against E-cadherin loss in SRCC. These results highlight the need for tailored therapeutic approaches based on distinct molecular and clinical features.</p>","PeriodicalId":520562,"journal":{"name":"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma From Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Protein Expressions.\",\"authors\":\"Jingwei Ma, Meng Zhu, Ning Zhang, Ningbo Huang, Xianyao Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PAI.0000000000001276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) exhibit distinct characteristics, yet a comprehensive comparison is lacking. In this retrospective study from 2020 to 2024, we analyzed 568 gastric cancer cases, including 216 SRCC and 352 ADC. In SRCC, MMR deficiencies were 3.2% for MLH1, 2.3% for PMS2, 0.5% for MSH2, with PMS2 deficiencies more prevalent in old patients and only one MSH2 deletions observed in cardia-involved cases. E-cadherin loss was 13.5%, predominantly in males and cases with nerve invasion, while Claudin18.2 positivity was 49.2%, particularly in early-stage patients. In ADC, MMR deficiencies were 8.5% for MLH1, 6.5% for PMS2, 0.3% for MSH6 and MSH2, with MLH1 and PMS2 deficiencies more common in females, old patients, and antrum-involved cases, and MSH2 deletions associated with larger tumors. E-cadherin loss was 5%, primarily in poorly differentiated and diffuse types, and Claudin18.2 positivity was 50.9%, especially in lymphatic metastasis patients. SRCC was more common in females and younger individuals, peaking 10 years earlier than ADC, which was significantly more prevalent in males. Both localized predominantly in the antrum. SRCC exhibited mucosa and serosa infiltration along with higher local metastasis, while ADC showed gradually increasing infiltration depth. MLH1 and PMS2 deficiencies were more common in ADC, while E-cadherin loss predominantly in SRCC. AB-PAS expression was higher in SRCC. Female and elderly were risk factors for MMR deficiencies in ADC, while female protected against E-cadherin loss in SRCC. These results highlight the need for tailored therapeutic approaches based on distinct molecular and clinical features.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000001276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000001276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma From Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Protein Expressions.
Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) exhibit distinct characteristics, yet a comprehensive comparison is lacking. In this retrospective study from 2020 to 2024, we analyzed 568 gastric cancer cases, including 216 SRCC and 352 ADC. In SRCC, MMR deficiencies were 3.2% for MLH1, 2.3% for PMS2, 0.5% for MSH2, with PMS2 deficiencies more prevalent in old patients and only one MSH2 deletions observed in cardia-involved cases. E-cadherin loss was 13.5%, predominantly in males and cases with nerve invasion, while Claudin18.2 positivity was 49.2%, particularly in early-stage patients. In ADC, MMR deficiencies were 8.5% for MLH1, 6.5% for PMS2, 0.3% for MSH6 and MSH2, with MLH1 and PMS2 deficiencies more common in females, old patients, and antrum-involved cases, and MSH2 deletions associated with larger tumors. E-cadherin loss was 5%, primarily in poorly differentiated and diffuse types, and Claudin18.2 positivity was 50.9%, especially in lymphatic metastasis patients. SRCC was more common in females and younger individuals, peaking 10 years earlier than ADC, which was significantly more prevalent in males. Both localized predominantly in the antrum. SRCC exhibited mucosa and serosa infiltration along with higher local metastasis, while ADC showed gradually increasing infiltration depth. MLH1 and PMS2 deficiencies were more common in ADC, while E-cadherin loss predominantly in SRCC. AB-PAS expression was higher in SRCC. Female and elderly were risk factors for MMR deficiencies in ADC, while female protected against E-cadherin loss in SRCC. These results highlight the need for tailored therapeutic approaches based on distinct molecular and clinical features.