{"title":"超声磁针导航技术在血管插管中的应用:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Tarasova Natalia, Khapov Ivan, Hu Yirui, Hsiung Benjamin, Zhang Xiaopeng, Husain Kamran","doi":"10.1177/11297298251362912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recently developed ultrasound magnetic field navigation technology allows to visualize the needle and project needle trajectory. The aim of this review was to assess performance with ultrasound magnetic needle navigation technique for vascular cannulation compared to the conventional ultrasound technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review was conducted according to the guideline for reporting systematic reviews (PRISMA). Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for eligible studies. Meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes between two techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of eight randomized controlled studies with 495 participants were included. For central venous cannulation, the ultrasound magnetic navigation technique was associated with significantly higher out of plane success rate (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = [1.07, 1.29]), significantly lower rate of posterior wall puncture (RR = 0.30, 95% CI = [0.11, 0.80]), and lower rate of artery puncture (RR = 0.14, 95% CI = [0.04, 0.45]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation the magnetic needle positioning technique is associated with higher success rate for out of plane cannulation approach and less complications in comparison to conventional ultrasound.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251362912"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using ultrasound magnetic needle navigation technique for vascular cannulation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tarasova Natalia, Khapov Ivan, Hu Yirui, Hsiung Benjamin, Zhang Xiaopeng, Husain Kamran\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298251362912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recently developed ultrasound magnetic field navigation technology allows to visualize the needle and project needle trajectory. The aim of this review was to assess performance with ultrasound magnetic needle navigation technique for vascular cannulation compared to the conventional ultrasound technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review was conducted according to the guideline for reporting systematic reviews (PRISMA). Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for eligible studies. Meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes between two techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of eight randomized controlled studies with 495 participants were included. For central venous cannulation, the ultrasound magnetic navigation technique was associated with significantly higher out of plane success rate (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = [1.07, 1.29]), significantly lower rate of posterior wall puncture (RR = 0.30, 95% CI = [0.11, 0.80]), and lower rate of artery puncture (RR = 0.14, 95% CI = [0.04, 0.45]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation the magnetic needle positioning technique is associated with higher success rate for out of plane cannulation approach and less complications in comparison to conventional ultrasound.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298251362912\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251362912\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251362912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:最近开发的超声磁场导航技术可以实现针的可视化和针轨迹的投影。本综述的目的是评估超声磁针导航技术在血管插管中的性能,并与传统超声技术进行比较。方法:按照系统评价报告指南(PRISMA)进行系统评价。在Ovid Medline、Embase和Cochrane Central数据库中检索符合条件的研究。进行meta分析比较两种技术的结果。结果:共纳入8项随机对照研究,共纳入495名受试者。对于中心静脉置管,超声磁导航技术具有较高的平面外成功率(RR = 1.17, 95% CI =[1.07, 1.29]),较低的后壁穿刺率(RR = 0.30, 95% CI =[0.11, 0.80])和较低的动脉穿刺率(RR = 0.14, 95% CI =[0.04, 0.45])。结论:在超声引导下中心静脉置管中,磁针定位技术与常规超声相比具有更高的平面外置管成功率和更少的并发症。
Using ultrasound magnetic needle navigation technique for vascular cannulation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Introduction: Recently developed ultrasound magnetic field navigation technology allows to visualize the needle and project needle trajectory. The aim of this review was to assess performance with ultrasound magnetic needle navigation technique for vascular cannulation compared to the conventional ultrasound technique.
Methods: The systematic review was conducted according to the guideline for reporting systematic reviews (PRISMA). Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for eligible studies. Meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes between two techniques.
Results: A total of eight randomized controlled studies with 495 participants were included. For central venous cannulation, the ultrasound magnetic navigation technique was associated with significantly higher out of plane success rate (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = [1.07, 1.29]), significantly lower rate of posterior wall puncture (RR = 0.30, 95% CI = [0.11, 0.80]), and lower rate of artery puncture (RR = 0.14, 95% CI = [0.04, 0.45]).
Conclusion: For ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation the magnetic needle positioning technique is associated with higher success rate for out of plane cannulation approach and less complications in comparison to conventional ultrasound.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques.
All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process.
The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level:
• Dialysis
• Oncology
• Interventional radiology
• Nutrition
• Nursing
• Intensive care
Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.