{"title":"Ponseti矫正畸形足的后足影像学异常长期随访。","authors":"Anil Agarwal, Lokesh Sharma, Kishmita Sachdeva, Ashish Upadhyay, Ankitha Ks, Varun Garg","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated to what extent the Ponseti technique is successful in radiologically aligning the deformed foot when the deformity was clinically corrected. This prospective study radiologically evaluated Ponseti-treated clubfoot children (Pirani score zero) at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The radiographs obtained were foot anteroposterior and lateral views (standing views). The angles evaluated in the anteroposterior view were the talocalcaneal and the talus first metatarsal angle. In the lateral view, calcaneal fifth metatarsal, talocalcaneal, talus first metatarsal, tibiocalcaneal, and calcaneal pitch angles were measured. The measured radiological angles were statistically compared to the unaffected feet of the unilateral cases. The mean age of initial treatment for 91 enrolled children (unilateral 37; bilateral 54) was 4 months, and the mean follow-up was 7.2 years. The radiographs revealed similarities for the treated (n = 145) and unaffected feet (n = 37) for two angles (talocalcaneal and talus first metatarsal) evaluated in the anteroposterior view, indicating corrected hindfoot varus and midfoot adduction. Again, the calcaneal fifth metatarsal, talus first metatarsal, and calcaneal pitch angles matched for both feet, indicating a completely corrected cavus. There were, however, significantly lower talocalcaneal (mean 28.1 degrees vs. 32.9 degrees in the unaffected feet) and higher tibiocalcaneal angles (76.5 degrees vs. 72 degrees in the unaffected feet) in the lateral projection of the treated clubfeet, indicating the presence of residual hindfoot abnormalities. The radiological measures in the successfully treated clubfeet matched those of unaffected feet. The exceptions were abnormal lateral talocalcaneal and tibiocalcaneal angles. These might indicate the presence of a certain amount of subclinical hindfoot equinus in the treated children.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiological hindfoot abnormalities in the Ponseti corrected clubfoot followed long-term.\",\"authors\":\"Anil Agarwal, Lokesh Sharma, Kishmita Sachdeva, Ashish Upadhyay, Ankitha Ks, Varun Garg\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We investigated to what extent the Ponseti technique is successful in radiologically aligning the deformed foot when the deformity was clinically corrected. This prospective study radiologically evaluated Ponseti-treated clubfoot children (Pirani score zero) at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The radiographs obtained were foot anteroposterior and lateral views (standing views). The angles evaluated in the anteroposterior view were the talocalcaneal and the talus first metatarsal angle. In the lateral view, calcaneal fifth metatarsal, talocalcaneal, talus first metatarsal, tibiocalcaneal, and calcaneal pitch angles were measured. The measured radiological angles were statistically compared to the unaffected feet of the unilateral cases. The mean age of initial treatment for 91 enrolled children (unilateral 37; bilateral 54) was 4 months, and the mean follow-up was 7.2 years. The radiographs revealed similarities for the treated (n = 145) and unaffected feet (n = 37) for two angles (talocalcaneal and talus first metatarsal) evaluated in the anteroposterior view, indicating corrected hindfoot varus and midfoot adduction. Again, the calcaneal fifth metatarsal, talus first metatarsal, and calcaneal pitch angles matched for both feet, indicating a completely corrected cavus. There were, however, significantly lower talocalcaneal (mean 28.1 degrees vs. 32.9 degrees in the unaffected feet) and higher tibiocalcaneal angles (76.5 degrees vs. 72 degrees in the unaffected feet) in the lateral projection of the treated clubfeet, indicating the presence of residual hindfoot abnormalities. The radiological measures in the successfully treated clubfeet matched those of unaffected feet. The exceptions were abnormal lateral talocalcaneal and tibiocalcaneal angles. These might indicate the presence of a certain amount of subclinical hindfoot equinus in the treated children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001277\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Radiological hindfoot abnormalities in the Ponseti corrected clubfoot followed long-term.
We investigated to what extent the Ponseti technique is successful in radiologically aligning the deformed foot when the deformity was clinically corrected. This prospective study radiologically evaluated Ponseti-treated clubfoot children (Pirani score zero) at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The radiographs obtained were foot anteroposterior and lateral views (standing views). The angles evaluated in the anteroposterior view were the talocalcaneal and the talus first metatarsal angle. In the lateral view, calcaneal fifth metatarsal, talocalcaneal, talus first metatarsal, tibiocalcaneal, and calcaneal pitch angles were measured. The measured radiological angles were statistically compared to the unaffected feet of the unilateral cases. The mean age of initial treatment for 91 enrolled children (unilateral 37; bilateral 54) was 4 months, and the mean follow-up was 7.2 years. The radiographs revealed similarities for the treated (n = 145) and unaffected feet (n = 37) for two angles (talocalcaneal and talus first metatarsal) evaluated in the anteroposterior view, indicating corrected hindfoot varus and midfoot adduction. Again, the calcaneal fifth metatarsal, talus first metatarsal, and calcaneal pitch angles matched for both feet, indicating a completely corrected cavus. There were, however, significantly lower talocalcaneal (mean 28.1 degrees vs. 32.9 degrees in the unaffected feet) and higher tibiocalcaneal angles (76.5 degrees vs. 72 degrees in the unaffected feet) in the lateral projection of the treated clubfeet, indicating the presence of residual hindfoot abnormalities. The radiological measures in the successfully treated clubfeet matched those of unaffected feet. The exceptions were abnormal lateral talocalcaneal and tibiocalcaneal angles. These might indicate the presence of a certain amount of subclinical hindfoot equinus in the treated children.
期刊介绍:
The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders.
It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies).
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.