Sarah Elizabeth Neville, Edward J Kim, Laura Horvath, Yasmine Vaughan, George Kulanda, Johanese Baun, Maada Naavo
{"title":"加强家庭以防止家庭分离和进入塞拉利昂的寄宿护理机构:一项准实验研究。","authors":"Sarah Elizabeth Neville, Edward J Kim, Laura Horvath, Yasmine Vaughan, George Kulanda, Johanese Baun, Maada Naavo","doi":"10.1007/s10566-025-09866-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recognizing children's right to grow up in a family, advocates have long called for evidence-based interventions to prevent children from needlessly entering residential care. However, such programs have rarely been evaluated in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the \"<i>Firmly Rooted</i>\" program's associations with improved relationship behaviors, relationship quality, emotional regulation, and economic stability in Sierra Leone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This non-randomized, two-group pre-test/post-test study compared <i>n</i> = 50 pairs of caregivers and their children aged 9-13 who underwent a two-day workshop plus special home visits with <i>n</i> = 63 pairs receiving care-as-usual. Data were collected via survey interviews with participants at baseline and endline on measures of relationship behaviors, relationship quality, emotional regulation, and economic stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intervention-associated improvements included the following: caregivers talked to children more, according to child report; caregivers and children reported apologizing more; caregivers reported comforting children more; and children reported sharing their feelings more. However, intervention caregivers reported more \"malicing\" and smaller improvements on hostility/aggression than comparison caregivers, and intervention children reported worse performance accepting emotions. Other areas had no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The program was associated with important improvements in caregiver-child relationship-enhancing behaviors, suggesting the promise of interventions to prevent family separation. Given other mixed and null effects, the program is being revised to strengthen other areas. Evidence on preventing children from entering residential care in LMICs is extremely lacking, despite the consensus on its importance; more investigation in this area is urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47479,"journal":{"name":"Child & Youth Care Forum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family Strengthening to Prevent Family Separation and Entrance into Residential Care Institutions in Sierra Leone: A Quasi-experimental Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Elizabeth Neville, Edward J Kim, Laura Horvath, Yasmine Vaughan, George Kulanda, Johanese Baun, Maada Naavo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10566-025-09866-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recognizing children's right to grow up in a family, advocates have long called for evidence-based interventions to prevent children from needlessly entering residential care. However, such programs have rarely been evaluated in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the \\\"<i>Firmly Rooted</i>\\\" program's associations with improved relationship behaviors, relationship quality, emotional regulation, and economic stability in Sierra Leone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This non-randomized, two-group pre-test/post-test study compared <i>n</i> = 50 pairs of caregivers and their children aged 9-13 who underwent a two-day workshop plus special home visits with <i>n</i> = 63 pairs receiving care-as-usual. Data were collected via survey interviews with participants at baseline and endline on measures of relationship behaviors, relationship quality, emotional regulation, and economic stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intervention-associated improvements included the following: caregivers talked to children more, according to child report; caregivers and children reported apologizing more; caregivers reported comforting children more; and children reported sharing their feelings more. However, intervention caregivers reported more \\\"malicing\\\" and smaller improvements on hostility/aggression than comparison caregivers, and intervention children reported worse performance accepting emotions. Other areas had no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The program was associated with important improvements in caregiver-child relationship-enhancing behaviors, suggesting the promise of interventions to prevent family separation. Given other mixed and null effects, the program is being revised to strengthen other areas. Evidence on preventing children from entering residential care in LMICs is extremely lacking, despite the consensus on its importance; more investigation in this area is urgently needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child & Youth Care Forum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323394/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child & Youth Care Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-025-09866-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child & Youth Care Forum","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-025-09866-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Family Strengthening to Prevent Family Separation and Entrance into Residential Care Institutions in Sierra Leone: A Quasi-experimental Study.
Background: Recognizing children's right to grow up in a family, advocates have long called for evidence-based interventions to prevent children from needlessly entering residential care. However, such programs have rarely been evaluated in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Objective: To assess the "Firmly Rooted" program's associations with improved relationship behaviors, relationship quality, emotional regulation, and economic stability in Sierra Leone.
Methods: This non-randomized, two-group pre-test/post-test study compared n = 50 pairs of caregivers and their children aged 9-13 who underwent a two-day workshop plus special home visits with n = 63 pairs receiving care-as-usual. Data were collected via survey interviews with participants at baseline and endline on measures of relationship behaviors, relationship quality, emotional regulation, and economic stability.
Results: Intervention-associated improvements included the following: caregivers talked to children more, according to child report; caregivers and children reported apologizing more; caregivers reported comforting children more; and children reported sharing their feelings more. However, intervention caregivers reported more "malicing" and smaller improvements on hostility/aggression than comparison caregivers, and intervention children reported worse performance accepting emotions. Other areas had no significant differences.
Conclusions: The program was associated with important improvements in caregiver-child relationship-enhancing behaviors, suggesting the promise of interventions to prevent family separation. Given other mixed and null effects, the program is being revised to strengthen other areas. Evidence on preventing children from entering residential care in LMICs is extremely lacking, despite the consensus on its importance; more investigation in this area is urgently needed.
期刊介绍:
Child & Youth Care Forum is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary publication that welcomes submissions – original empirical research papers and theoretical reviews as well as invited commentaries – on children, youth, and families. Contributions to Child & Youth Care Forum are submitted by researchers, practitioners, and clinicians across the interrelated disciplines of child psychology, early childhood, education, medical anthropology, pediatrics, pediatric psychology, psychiatry, public policy, school/educational psychology, social work, and sociology as well as government agencies and corporate and nonprofit organizations that seek to advance current knowledge and practice. Child & Youth Care Forum publishes scientifically rigorous, empirical papers and theoretical reviews that have implications for child and adolescent mental health, psychosocial development, assessment, interventions, and services broadly defined. For example, papers may address issues of child and adolescent typical and/or atypical development through effective youth care assessment and intervention practices. In addition, papers may address strategies for helping youth overcome difficulties (e.g., mental health problems) or overcome adversity (e.g., traumatic stress, community violence) as well as all children actualize their potential (e.g., positive psychology goals). Assessment papers that advance knowledge as well as methodological papers with implications for child and youth research and care are also encouraged.