Amit Kramer, Anat Brunstein-Klomek, Nili Neuthal, Tal Nakash Bar, Dana Tzur Bitan
{"title":"专业人士和服务使用者对以色列精神保健未来的看法。","authors":"Amit Kramer, Anat Brunstein-Klomek, Nili Neuthal, Tal Nakash Bar, Dana Tzur Bitan","doi":"10.1186/s13584-025-00710-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A recent call has been made in Israel to address the needs of citizens inflicted by multiple adversities such world pandemic, internal conflicts, events of mass trauma and ongoing war. Nonetheless, public's and mental health professional's view regarding these needs and their prioritization is not well understood. This study aims to bridge this gap in knowledge, by assessing mental health service users and professionals' views regarding the future of mental health in Israel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two surveys were distributed to mental health professionals and service users. Responders (286 professionals and 522 service users) were asked about their vision for future mental health services and their views regarding the integration of technology and innovation, using a close-ended measure developed by mental health professionals to address local challenges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The top-rated category among professionals and service users was improving accessibility, with 75% of the service users and 82% of the professionals ranking this item as one of top-three items. Individuals with less experience with the mental healthcare system tended to rank personalized care as second-ranked priority (OR = 0.48, p = 0.04), whereas highly experienced individuals were more likely to rank alternatives to psychiatric hospitalization as third-ranked priority (OR = 2.99, p < 0.001). Professionals ranked the level of innovation in Israel's mental healthcare as 3.37 (SD = 1.82), and service users ranked 3.18 (SD = 2.12) out of 10. Among mental health professionals, lack of resources was rated as the predominant challenge in implementing technology and innovation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policy and decision-makers in Israel should consider addressing the issue of mental healthcare accessibility as top priority when planning a mental health reform, as well as routes to improve personalized care and alternative to psychiatric admissions. Steps should be taken to improve innovation and technology as means to improve the quality of mental healthcare in Israel.</p>","PeriodicalId":46694,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professional and service-user perspectives regarding the future of mental healthcare in Israel.\",\"authors\":\"Amit Kramer, Anat Brunstein-Klomek, Nili Neuthal, Tal Nakash Bar, Dana Tzur Bitan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13584-025-00710-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A recent call has been made in Israel to address the needs of citizens inflicted by multiple adversities such world pandemic, internal conflicts, events of mass trauma and ongoing war. Nonetheless, public's and mental health professional's view regarding these needs and their prioritization is not well understood. This study aims to bridge this gap in knowledge, by assessing mental health service users and professionals' views regarding the future of mental health in Israel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two surveys were distributed to mental health professionals and service users. Responders (286 professionals and 522 service users) were asked about their vision for future mental health services and their views regarding the integration of technology and innovation, using a close-ended measure developed by mental health professionals to address local challenges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The top-rated category among professionals and service users was improving accessibility, with 75% of the service users and 82% of the professionals ranking this item as one of top-three items. Individuals with less experience with the mental healthcare system tended to rank personalized care as second-ranked priority (OR = 0.48, p = 0.04), whereas highly experienced individuals were more likely to rank alternatives to psychiatric hospitalization as third-ranked priority (OR = 2.99, p < 0.001). Professionals ranked the level of innovation in Israel's mental healthcare as 3.37 (SD = 1.82), and service users ranked 3.18 (SD = 2.12) out of 10. Among mental health professionals, lack of resources was rated as the predominant challenge in implementing technology and innovation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policy and decision-makers in Israel should consider addressing the issue of mental healthcare accessibility as top priority when planning a mental health reform, as well as routes to improve personalized care and alternative to psychiatric admissions. Steps should be taken to improve innovation and technology as means to improve the quality of mental healthcare in Israel.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330161/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-025-00710-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-025-00710-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:最近在以色列呼吁解决遭受多重逆境的公民的需要,这些逆境包括世界流行病、内部冲突、大规模创伤事件和持续的战争。然而,公众和精神卫生专业人员对这些需求及其优先次序的看法并没有得到很好的理解。这项研究旨在通过评估心理健康服务使用者和专业人员对以色列心理健康未来的看法,弥合这一知识差距。方法:对心理卫生专业人员和服务使用者进行问卷调查。应答者(286名专业人员和522名服务使用者)被问及他们对未来精神卫生服务的愿景以及他们对技术和创新整合的看法,使用了精神卫生专业人员为应对当地挑战而开发的封闭式措施。结果:专业人员和服务用户评价最高的类别是改善无障碍,75%的服务用户和82%的专业人员将这一项目列为前三名之一。经验较少的个体倾向于将个性化护理列为第二优先(OR = 0.48, p = 0.04),而经验丰富的个体更倾向于将精神科住院治疗的替代方案列为第三优先(OR = 2.99, p)。以色列的政策和决策者在规划精神卫生改革时,应考虑将精神卫生保健可及性问题作为最优先事项,并考虑改善个性化护理的途径和精神病住院的替代办法。应采取步骤改进创新和技术,以此作为提高以色列精神保健质量的手段。
Professional and service-user perspectives regarding the future of mental healthcare in Israel.
Background: A recent call has been made in Israel to address the needs of citizens inflicted by multiple adversities such world pandemic, internal conflicts, events of mass trauma and ongoing war. Nonetheless, public's and mental health professional's view regarding these needs and their prioritization is not well understood. This study aims to bridge this gap in knowledge, by assessing mental health service users and professionals' views regarding the future of mental health in Israel.
Methods: Two surveys were distributed to mental health professionals and service users. Responders (286 professionals and 522 service users) were asked about their vision for future mental health services and their views regarding the integration of technology and innovation, using a close-ended measure developed by mental health professionals to address local challenges.
Results: The top-rated category among professionals and service users was improving accessibility, with 75% of the service users and 82% of the professionals ranking this item as one of top-three items. Individuals with less experience with the mental healthcare system tended to rank personalized care as second-ranked priority (OR = 0.48, p = 0.04), whereas highly experienced individuals were more likely to rank alternatives to psychiatric hospitalization as third-ranked priority (OR = 2.99, p < 0.001). Professionals ranked the level of innovation in Israel's mental healthcare as 3.37 (SD = 1.82), and service users ranked 3.18 (SD = 2.12) out of 10. Among mental health professionals, lack of resources was rated as the predominant challenge in implementing technology and innovation.
Conclusions: Policy and decision-makers in Israel should consider addressing the issue of mental healthcare accessibility as top priority when planning a mental health reform, as well as routes to improve personalized care and alternative to psychiatric admissions. Steps should be taken to improve innovation and technology as means to improve the quality of mental healthcare in Israel.