利用人工智能提高急性偶发性肺栓塞的检测。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Ronald S Kuzo, David L Levin, Alexander K Bratt, Lara A Walkoff, Garima Suman, Damon E Houghton
{"title":"利用人工智能提高急性偶发性肺栓塞的检测。","authors":"Ronald S Kuzo, David L Levin, Alexander K Bratt, Lara A Walkoff, Garima Suman, Damon E Houghton","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.07.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incidental pulmonary emboli (IPE) are frequently overlooked by radiologists. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been developed to aid detection of pulmonary emboli.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure diagnostic performance of AI compared with prospective interpretation by radiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A commercially available AI algorithm was used to retrospectively review 14 453 contrast-enhanced outpatient computed tomography examinations of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in 9171 patients, where pulmonary embolism was not clinically suspected. Natural language processing searches of reports identified IPE detected prospectively. Thoracic radiologists reviewed all cases read as positive by AI or natural language processing to confirm IPE and assess the most proximal level of clot and overall clot burden. A total of 1400 cases read as negative by both the initial radiologist and AI were rereviewed to assess for additional IPE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiologists prospectively detected 218 IPE, and AI detected an additional 36 unreported cases. AI missed 30 cases of IPE detected by the radiologists and had 94 false positives. For 36 IPE missed by the radiologists, median clot burden was 1, and 19 were solitary segmental or subsegmental. For 30 IPE missed by AI, 1 case had large central emboli, and the others were small with 23 solitary subsegmental emboli. Radiologist rereview of 1400 examinations interpreted as negative found 8 additional cases of IPE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with radiologists, AI had similar sensitivity but reduced positive predictive value. Our experience indicates that the AI tool is not ready to be used autonomously without human oversight, but a human observer plus AI is better than either alone for detection of IPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of artificial intelligence to improve detection of acute incidental pulmonary emboli.\",\"authors\":\"Ronald S Kuzo, David L Levin, Alexander K Bratt, Lara A Walkoff, Garima Suman, Damon E Houghton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.07.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incidental pulmonary emboli (IPE) are frequently overlooked by radiologists. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been developed to aid detection of pulmonary emboli.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure diagnostic performance of AI compared with prospective interpretation by radiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A commercially available AI algorithm was used to retrospectively review 14 453 contrast-enhanced outpatient computed tomography examinations of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in 9171 patients, where pulmonary embolism was not clinically suspected. Natural language processing searches of reports identified IPE detected prospectively. Thoracic radiologists reviewed all cases read as positive by AI or natural language processing to confirm IPE and assess the most proximal level of clot and overall clot burden. A total of 1400 cases read as negative by both the initial radiologist and AI were rereviewed to assess for additional IPE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiologists prospectively detected 218 IPE, and AI detected an additional 36 unreported cases. AI missed 30 cases of IPE detected by the radiologists and had 94 false positives. For 36 IPE missed by the radiologists, median clot burden was 1, and 19 were solitary segmental or subsegmental. For 30 IPE missed by AI, 1 case had large central emboli, and the others were small with 23 solitary subsegmental emboli. Radiologist rereview of 1400 examinations interpreted as negative found 8 additional cases of IPE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with radiologists, AI had similar sensitivity but reduced positive predictive value. Our experience indicates that the AI tool is not ready to be used autonomously without human oversight, but a human observer plus AI is better than either alone for detection of IPE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.07.024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.07.024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:偶发性肺栓塞(IPE)经常被放射科医生忽视。人工智能(AI)算法已经被开发出来,以帮助检测肺栓塞。目的:将人工智能的诊断性能与放射科医生的前瞻性解读进行比较。患者/方法:采用市售AI算法对9171例临床未怀疑PE的患者进行14453次增强CT门诊CAP检查进行回顾性分析。自然语言处理(NLP)搜索报告识别IPE前瞻性检测。胸科放射科医生回顾了所有经AI或NLP诊断为阳性的病例,以确认IPE并评估最近端血栓水平和总体血栓负担。1400例被最初的放射科医生和人工智能诊断为阴性的病例被重新审查,以评估额外的IPE。结果:放射科医师前瞻性检测到218例IPE, AI检测到另外36例未报告病例。人工智能错过了放射科医生检测到的30例IPE,有94例假阳性。放射科医师遗漏的36例IPE,中位血块负担为1,19例为孤立节段性或亚节段性。30例人工智能漏诊IPE, 1例中心大栓子,其余小栓子,23例单独亚节段性栓子。放射科医生重新审查了1400份阴性检查,发现了8例额外的IPE病例。结论:与放射科医师相比,人工智能具有相似的敏感性,但阳性预测值降低。我们的经验表明,人工智能工具还没有准备好在没有人类监督的情况下自主使用,但在检测偶发性肺栓塞方面,人类观察员加上人工智能比单独使用任何一种都要好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of artificial intelligence to improve detection of acute incidental pulmonary emboli.

Background: Incidental pulmonary emboli (IPE) are frequently overlooked by radiologists. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been developed to aid detection of pulmonary emboli.

Objectives: To measure diagnostic performance of AI compared with prospective interpretation by radiologists.

Methods: A commercially available AI algorithm was used to retrospectively review 14 453 contrast-enhanced outpatient computed tomography examinations of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in 9171 patients, where pulmonary embolism was not clinically suspected. Natural language processing searches of reports identified IPE detected prospectively. Thoracic radiologists reviewed all cases read as positive by AI or natural language processing to confirm IPE and assess the most proximal level of clot and overall clot burden. A total of 1400 cases read as negative by both the initial radiologist and AI were rereviewed to assess for additional IPE.

Results: Radiologists prospectively detected 218 IPE, and AI detected an additional 36 unreported cases. AI missed 30 cases of IPE detected by the radiologists and had 94 false positives. For 36 IPE missed by the radiologists, median clot burden was 1, and 19 were solitary segmental or subsegmental. For 30 IPE missed by AI, 1 case had large central emboli, and the others were small with 23 solitary subsegmental emboli. Radiologist rereview of 1400 examinations interpreted as negative found 8 additional cases of IPE.

Conclusion: Compared with radiologists, AI had similar sensitivity but reduced positive predictive value. Our experience indicates that the AI tool is not ready to be used autonomously without human oversight, but a human observer plus AI is better than either alone for detection of IPE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
24.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community. Types of Publications: The journal publishes a variety of content, including: Original research reports State-of-the-art reviews Brief reports Case reports Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal Forum articles Correspondence Announcements Scope of Contributions: Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include: Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信