在撒哈拉以南非洲使用交互式、以患者为中心的移动医疗技术:范围审查。

IF 3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1200/GO-25-00157
Kamaria L Lee, Susan Citonje Msadabwe-Chikuni, Dorothy C Lombe, Graciela M Nogueras Gonzalez, Pavitra P Krishnamani, Patrick P Carriere, Austin Huang, Lango Sichizya, Elizabeth Yu Chiao, Kate J Krause, Lilie L Lin, Susan K Peterson
{"title":"在撒哈拉以南非洲使用交互式、以患者为中心的移动医疗技术:范围审查。","authors":"Kamaria L Lee, Susan Citonje Msadabwe-Chikuni, Dorothy C Lombe, Graciela M Nogueras Gonzalez, Pavitra P Krishnamani, Patrick P Carriere, Austin Huang, Lango Sichizya, Elizabeth Yu Chiao, Kate J Krause, Lilie L Lin, Susan K Peterson","doi":"10.1200/GO-25-00157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although significant differences in health care outcomes remain between low-middle-income countries and high-income countries, access to mobile devices is comparable. Interactive, patient-centric mobile health (mHealth) technology interventions may mitigate the increasing cancer burden in sub-Saharan Africa. However, these interventions' distribution, efficacy, and feasibility in the region are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compiled literature on two-way, patient-centric mHealth technology in sub-Saharan Africa. We searched online databases for studies completed in sub-Saharan Africa with mHealth interventions (inception to July 23, 2024). Two authors independently completed title/abstract screening. Inclusion criteria were sub-Saharan African setting, age 13 years or older with any health condition, two-way mobile communication, and outcomes studies. Studies that passed title/abstract screening underwent full-text review by two independent authors. Discrepancies were resolved through consensus. Data extraction/review was completed using Covidence software and Microsoft Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retrieved 1,380 unique citations. After screening/review, the final sample size was 37. Randomized controlled trials were most common (n = 20). A plurality took place in Kenya. HIV was the most common condition (n = 30). Interventions included messages about medication/appointment adherence and patient status. Most studies (32 of 37 [86%]) had at least one positive finding. Study characteristics varied widely for those with positive findings, but using various message frequencies, or peer navigators/social supporters increased success. All studies with no positive findings were randomized controlled trials; four of the five were on HIV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most two-way, patient-centric mHealth interventions in sub-Saharan Africa have been successful by at least one measure. Interventions have primarily been for patients with HIV. No studies have focused on cancer. With the increasing cancer burden in sub-Saharan Africa, an understanding of mHealth in oncologic settings is greatly needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2500157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Interactive, Patient-Centric Mobile Health Technology in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Kamaria L Lee, Susan Citonje Msadabwe-Chikuni, Dorothy C Lombe, Graciela M Nogueras Gonzalez, Pavitra P Krishnamani, Patrick P Carriere, Austin Huang, Lango Sichizya, Elizabeth Yu Chiao, Kate J Krause, Lilie L Lin, Susan K Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/GO-25-00157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although significant differences in health care outcomes remain between low-middle-income countries and high-income countries, access to mobile devices is comparable. Interactive, patient-centric mobile health (mHealth) technology interventions may mitigate the increasing cancer burden in sub-Saharan Africa. However, these interventions' distribution, efficacy, and feasibility in the region are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compiled literature on two-way, patient-centric mHealth technology in sub-Saharan Africa. We searched online databases for studies completed in sub-Saharan Africa with mHealth interventions (inception to July 23, 2024). Two authors independently completed title/abstract screening. Inclusion criteria were sub-Saharan African setting, age 13 years or older with any health condition, two-way mobile communication, and outcomes studies. Studies that passed title/abstract screening underwent full-text review by two independent authors. Discrepancies were resolved through consensus. Data extraction/review was completed using Covidence software and Microsoft Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retrieved 1,380 unique citations. After screening/review, the final sample size was 37. Randomized controlled trials were most common (n = 20). A plurality took place in Kenya. HIV was the most common condition (n = 30). Interventions included messages about medication/appointment adherence and patient status. Most studies (32 of 37 [86%]) had at least one positive finding. Study characteristics varied widely for those with positive findings, but using various message frequencies, or peer navigators/social supporters increased success. All studies with no positive findings were randomized controlled trials; four of the five were on HIV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most two-way, patient-centric mHealth interventions in sub-Saharan Africa have been successful by at least one measure. Interventions have primarily been for patients with HIV. No studies have focused on cancer. With the increasing cancer burden in sub-Saharan Africa, an understanding of mHealth in oncologic settings is greatly needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e2500157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-25-00157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-25-00157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管中低收入国家和高收入国家在卫生保健结果方面仍然存在显著差异,但移动设备的使用情况具有可比性。交互式、以患者为中心的移动医疗(mHealth)技术干预措施可能减轻撒哈拉以南非洲地区日益增加的癌症负担。然而,这些干预措施在该地区的分布、功效和可行性尚不清楚。方法:我们汇编了撒哈拉以南非洲地区双向、以患者为中心的移动医疗技术的文献。我们检索了在撒哈拉以南非洲完成的移动医疗干预研究的在线数据库(开始至2024年7月23日)。两位作者独立完成题目/摘要筛选。纳入标准为撒哈拉以南非洲地区、年龄在13岁或以上且有任何健康状况、双向移动通信和结局研究。通过标题/摘要筛选的研究由两位独立作者进行全文审查。分歧通过协商一致解决。数据提取/审核使用covid - ence软件和Microsoft Excel完成。结果:检索到1380条唯一引用。经过筛选/审查,最终样本量为37例。随机对照试验最为常见(n = 20)。肯尼亚出现了多数投票。HIV是最常见的情况(n = 30)。干预措施包括关于药物/预约依从性和患者状态的信息。大多数研究(37个中的32个[86%])至少有一个阳性发现。对于那些有积极发现的人来说,研究特征差异很大,但使用不同的信息频率,或者同伴导航/社会支持者会增加成功。所有没有阳性结果的研究都是随机对照试验;五人中有四人感染了艾滋病毒。结论:在撒哈拉以南非洲,大多数以患者为中心的双向移动医疗干预措施至少在一项措施上取得了成功。干预措施主要针对艾滋病毒感染者。目前还没有针对癌症的研究。随着撒哈拉以南非洲地区癌症负担的增加,非常需要了解肿瘤学环境中的移动医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Interactive, Patient-Centric Mobile Health Technology in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review.

Purpose: Although significant differences in health care outcomes remain between low-middle-income countries and high-income countries, access to mobile devices is comparable. Interactive, patient-centric mobile health (mHealth) technology interventions may mitigate the increasing cancer burden in sub-Saharan Africa. However, these interventions' distribution, efficacy, and feasibility in the region are unknown.

Methods: We compiled literature on two-way, patient-centric mHealth technology in sub-Saharan Africa. We searched online databases for studies completed in sub-Saharan Africa with mHealth interventions (inception to July 23, 2024). Two authors independently completed title/abstract screening. Inclusion criteria were sub-Saharan African setting, age 13 years or older with any health condition, two-way mobile communication, and outcomes studies. Studies that passed title/abstract screening underwent full-text review by two independent authors. Discrepancies were resolved through consensus. Data extraction/review was completed using Covidence software and Microsoft Excel.

Results: We retrieved 1,380 unique citations. After screening/review, the final sample size was 37. Randomized controlled trials were most common (n = 20). A plurality took place in Kenya. HIV was the most common condition (n = 30). Interventions included messages about medication/appointment adherence and patient status. Most studies (32 of 37 [86%]) had at least one positive finding. Study characteristics varied widely for those with positive findings, but using various message frequencies, or peer navigators/social supporters increased success. All studies with no positive findings were randomized controlled trials; four of the five were on HIV.

Conclusion: Most two-way, patient-centric mHealth interventions in sub-Saharan Africa have been successful by at least one measure. Interventions have primarily been for patients with HIV. No studies have focused on cancer. With the increasing cancer burden in sub-Saharan Africa, an understanding of mHealth in oncologic settings is greatly needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信