微创活检技术预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗后乳腺病理完全缓解。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gland surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-31 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.21037/gs-2025-103
Zhiqiang Shi, Pengfei Qiu, Yongsheng Wang, Hong Liu
{"title":"微创活检技术预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗后乳腺病理完全缓解。","authors":"Zhiqiang Shi, Pengfei Qiu, Yongsheng Wang, Hong Liu","doi":"10.21037/gs-2025-103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is widely used in the treatment of breast cancer, and the pathological complete response (pCR) rate is increasing. However, currently, the prediction of pCR still lacks accuracy. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of minimally invasive biopsy techniques in predicting breast pCR (bpCR) after NAT in breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2022 to October 2024, a prospective single-arm study was conducted on 132 patients with primary breast cancer who achieved breast radiologic complete response (brCR) or breast radiologic partial response (brPR) after NAT at the Breast Center of Shandong Cancer Hospital. Before NAT, a marker clip was placed at the center of the tumor bed. After NAT, in patients with no residual lesions suggested by ultrasound, iodine-125 was placed under the guidance of mammography, followed by routine breast surgery (breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy). Postoperatively, multiple-site core needle biopsy (CNB) under ultrasound guidance was performed on the surgical specimen. The pathological results of CNB specimens were compared with those of surgical specimens to assess the accuracy of CNB in predicting bpCR (ypT0) after NAT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 patients (39.4%) achieved bpCR after NAT. Univariate analysis showed that tumor molecular subtypes, brCR after NAT, and axillary pathological complete response (apCR) were significantly associated with bpCR (P=0.02, 0.02, and P<0.001, respectively). Ultrasound-guided multiple-site CNB had an accuracy, negative predictive value (NPV), and false-negative rate (FNR) of 90.9%, 81.0%, and 14.8%, respectively, in predicting bpCR after NAT, which were superior to those of ultrasound, mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The combination of imaging examinations and ultrasound-guided multiple-site CNB significantly reduced the FNR compared with CNB alone (7.4% <i>vs.</i> 14.8%; P<0.001). No false-negative results were found in 45 cases using large-bore CNB needles (12G).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of imaging examinations and ultrasound-guided multiple-site CNB has the potential to accurately predict bpCR after NAT, making it possible to selectively avoid breast surgery in breast cancer patients after NAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"14 7","pages":"1263-1271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally invasive biopsy technique predicting breast pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiqiang Shi, Pengfei Qiu, Yongsheng Wang, Hong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/gs-2025-103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is widely used in the treatment of breast cancer, and the pathological complete response (pCR) rate is increasing. However, currently, the prediction of pCR still lacks accuracy. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of minimally invasive biopsy techniques in predicting breast pCR (bpCR) after NAT in breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2022 to October 2024, a prospective single-arm study was conducted on 132 patients with primary breast cancer who achieved breast radiologic complete response (brCR) or breast radiologic partial response (brPR) after NAT at the Breast Center of Shandong Cancer Hospital. Before NAT, a marker clip was placed at the center of the tumor bed. After NAT, in patients with no residual lesions suggested by ultrasound, iodine-125 was placed under the guidance of mammography, followed by routine breast surgery (breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy). Postoperatively, multiple-site core needle biopsy (CNB) under ultrasound guidance was performed on the surgical specimen. The pathological results of CNB specimens were compared with those of surgical specimens to assess the accuracy of CNB in predicting bpCR (ypT0) after NAT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 patients (39.4%) achieved bpCR after NAT. Univariate analysis showed that tumor molecular subtypes, brCR after NAT, and axillary pathological complete response (apCR) were significantly associated with bpCR (P=0.02, 0.02, and P<0.001, respectively). Ultrasound-guided multiple-site CNB had an accuracy, negative predictive value (NPV), and false-negative rate (FNR) of 90.9%, 81.0%, and 14.8%, respectively, in predicting bpCR after NAT, which were superior to those of ultrasound, mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The combination of imaging examinations and ultrasound-guided multiple-site CNB significantly reduced the FNR compared with CNB alone (7.4% <i>vs.</i> 14.8%; P<0.001). No false-negative results were found in 45 cases using large-bore CNB needles (12G).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of imaging examinations and ultrasound-guided multiple-site CNB has the potential to accurately predict bpCR after NAT, making it possible to selectively avoid breast surgery in breast cancer patients after NAT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gland surgery\",\"volume\":\"14 7\",\"pages\":\"1263-1271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322751/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gland surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2025-103\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2025-103","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新辅助治疗(NAT)在乳腺癌治疗中的应用越来越广泛,病理完全缓解(pCR)率越来越高。但目前,pCR预测的准确性还比较低。本研究旨在探讨微创活检技术在预测乳腺癌NAT后乳腺pCR (bpCR)的准确性。方法:于2022年10月至2024年10月,在山东省肿瘤医院乳腺中心对132例经NAT治疗后达到乳房放射学完全缓解(brCR)或乳房放射学部分缓解(brPR)的原发性乳腺癌患者进行前瞻性单臂研究。在NAT之前,在肿瘤床的中心放置一个标记夹。NAT后,超声提示无残留病变的患者,在乳房x线摄影指导下碘-125,常规乳房手术(保乳手术或乳房切除术)。术后在超声引导下对手术标本行多部位核穿刺活检(CNB)。结果:52例(39.4%)患者在NAT后实现了bpCR。单因素分析显示,肿瘤分子亚型、NAT后brCR、腋窝病理完全缓解(apCR)与bpCR有显著相关性(P=0.02、0.02、Pvs. 14.8%;结论:影像学检查与超声引导下多位点CNB相结合,具有准确预测NAT后bpCR的潜力,为NAT后乳腺癌患者选择性避免乳房手术提供了可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Minimally invasive biopsy technique predicting breast pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Minimally invasive biopsy technique predicting breast pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Minimally invasive biopsy technique predicting breast pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is widely used in the treatment of breast cancer, and the pathological complete response (pCR) rate is increasing. However, currently, the prediction of pCR still lacks accuracy. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of minimally invasive biopsy techniques in predicting breast pCR (bpCR) after NAT in breast cancer.

Methods: From October 2022 to October 2024, a prospective single-arm study was conducted on 132 patients with primary breast cancer who achieved breast radiologic complete response (brCR) or breast radiologic partial response (brPR) after NAT at the Breast Center of Shandong Cancer Hospital. Before NAT, a marker clip was placed at the center of the tumor bed. After NAT, in patients with no residual lesions suggested by ultrasound, iodine-125 was placed under the guidance of mammography, followed by routine breast surgery (breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy). Postoperatively, multiple-site core needle biopsy (CNB) under ultrasound guidance was performed on the surgical specimen. The pathological results of CNB specimens were compared with those of surgical specimens to assess the accuracy of CNB in predicting bpCR (ypT0) after NAT.

Results: A total of 52 patients (39.4%) achieved bpCR after NAT. Univariate analysis showed that tumor molecular subtypes, brCR after NAT, and axillary pathological complete response (apCR) were significantly associated with bpCR (P=0.02, 0.02, and P<0.001, respectively). Ultrasound-guided multiple-site CNB had an accuracy, negative predictive value (NPV), and false-negative rate (FNR) of 90.9%, 81.0%, and 14.8%, respectively, in predicting bpCR after NAT, which were superior to those of ultrasound, mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The combination of imaging examinations and ultrasound-guided multiple-site CNB significantly reduced the FNR compared with CNB alone (7.4% vs. 14.8%; P<0.001). No false-negative results were found in 45 cases using large-bore CNB needles (12G).

Conclusions: The combination of imaging examinations and ultrasound-guided multiple-site CNB has the potential to accurately predict bpCR after NAT, making it possible to selectively avoid breast surgery in breast cancer patients after NAT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信