西班牙RCC一线及后续治疗模式。一个真实世界的描述性横断面研究。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Future oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-07 DOI:10.1080/14796694.2025.2542030
José A Arranz, Cristina Martínez, Lucía Gallego, Ana Heredero, Pablo Rebollo, Laura Fernández, Elvira Estella, David Vilanova Larena, Virginia Palomar
{"title":"西班牙RCC一线及后续治疗模式。一个真实世界的描述性横断面研究。","authors":"José A Arranz, Cristina Martínez, Lucía Gallego, Ana Heredero, Pablo Rebollo, Laura Fernández, Elvira Estella, David Vilanova Larena, Virginia Palomar","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2025.2542030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has had limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Initially, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) increased progression-free survival (PFS) and allowed the identification of favorable (FP), intermediate (IP) and poor prognosis (PP) subgroups. While TKIs remain an option for FP patients, combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (IO) plus TKI in the overall population, or IO/IO in IP/PP patients, have improved overall survival (OS), and have become the standard of care. However, their adoption in clinical practice varies across countries.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional observational study using Oncology Dynamics™ database to assess treatment patterns in Spain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,587 metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients were registered, 900 in first-line treatment for clear cell mRCC (mccRCC). In 2022, among mccRCC FP patients treated by oncologists (N = 137), 92.7% received TKIs; while IP/PP patients (N = 298), 56.7% received TKIs, 27.5% antiPD1-antiCTLA4, and 13.8% antiPD1-TKI. In 2023, mccRCC FP patients (N = 124) received 94.4% TKIs; and IP/PP patients (N = 256) received 48.4% TKIs, 38.3% antiPD1-antiCTLA4, and 12.1% antiPD1-TKI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During this period, the uptake of IO/IO and IO/TKI in clinical practice in Spain was lower than expected according to current recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2767-2774"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12407652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of treatment in first and subsequent lines in RCC in Spain. A real-world descriptive cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"José A Arranz, Cristina Martínez, Lucía Gallego, Ana Heredero, Pablo Rebollo, Laura Fernández, Elvira Estella, David Vilanova Larena, Virginia Palomar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14796694.2025.2542030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has had limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Initially, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) increased progression-free survival (PFS) and allowed the identification of favorable (FP), intermediate (IP) and poor prognosis (PP) subgroups. While TKIs remain an option for FP patients, combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (IO) plus TKI in the overall population, or IO/IO in IP/PP patients, have improved overall survival (OS), and have become the standard of care. However, their adoption in clinical practice varies across countries.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional observational study using Oncology Dynamics™ database to assess treatment patterns in Spain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,587 metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients were registered, 900 in first-line treatment for clear cell mRCC (mccRCC). In 2022, among mccRCC FP patients treated by oncologists (N = 137), 92.7% received TKIs; while IP/PP patients (N = 298), 56.7% received TKIs, 27.5% antiPD1-antiCTLA4, and 13.8% antiPD1-TKI. In 2023, mccRCC FP patients (N = 124) received 94.4% TKIs; and IP/PP patients (N = 256) received 48.4% TKIs, 38.3% antiPD1-antiCTLA4, and 12.1% antiPD1-TKI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During this period, the uptake of IO/IO and IO/TKI in clinical practice in Spain was lower than expected according to current recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2767-2774\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12407652/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2542030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2542030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)治疗方案有限,预后较差。最初,酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)增加了无进展生存期(PFS),并允许识别良好(FP),中间(IP)和不良预后(PP)亚组。虽然TKI仍然是FP患者的一种选择,但在总体人群中,免疫检查点抑制剂(IO)加TKI,或在IP/PP患者中使用IO/IO,已经提高了总生存期(OS),并已成为标准的治疗方法。然而,它们在临床实践中的采用因国家而异。方法:我们使用Oncology Dynamics™数据库进行了一项横断面观察性研究,以评估西班牙的治疗模式。结果:共登记了1587例转移性RCC (mRCC)患者,900例接受了透明细胞mRCC (mccRCC)的一线治疗。2022年,在肿瘤学家治疗的mccRCC FP患者中(N = 137), 92.7%接受了TKIs;而IP/PP患者(N = 298), 56.7%接受TKIs, 27.5%接受抗pd1 - antitla4, 13.8%接受抗pd1 - tki。2023年,mccRCC FP患者(N = 124)的TKIs为94.4%;IP/PP患者(N = 256)的TKIs为48.4%,antipd1 - antitla4为38.3%,antiPD1-TKI为12.1%。结论:在此期间,西班牙临床实践中IO/IO和IO/TKI的摄取低于目前建议的预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patterns of treatment in first and subsequent lines in RCC in Spain. A real-world descriptive cross-sectional study.

Patterns of treatment in first and subsequent lines in RCC in Spain. A real-world descriptive cross-sectional study.

Patterns of treatment in first and subsequent lines in RCC in Spain. A real-world descriptive cross-sectional study.

Patterns of treatment in first and subsequent lines in RCC in Spain. A real-world descriptive cross-sectional study.

Aim: Advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has had limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Initially, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) increased progression-free survival (PFS) and allowed the identification of favorable (FP), intermediate (IP) and poor prognosis (PP) subgroups. While TKIs remain an option for FP patients, combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (IO) plus TKI in the overall population, or IO/IO in IP/PP patients, have improved overall survival (OS), and have become the standard of care. However, their adoption in clinical practice varies across countries.

Method: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study using Oncology Dynamics™ database to assess treatment patterns in Spain.

Results: A total of 1,587 metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients were registered, 900 in first-line treatment for clear cell mRCC (mccRCC). In 2022, among mccRCC FP patients treated by oncologists (N = 137), 92.7% received TKIs; while IP/PP patients (N = 298), 56.7% received TKIs, 27.5% antiPD1-antiCTLA4, and 13.8% antiPD1-TKI. In 2023, mccRCC FP patients (N = 124) received 94.4% TKIs; and IP/PP patients (N = 256) received 48.4% TKIs, 38.3% antiPD1-antiCTLA4, and 12.1% antiPD1-TKI.

Conclusions: During this period, the uptake of IO/IO and IO/TKI in clinical practice in Spain was lower than expected according to current recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future oncology
Future oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
335
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community. The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信