Kyoungwan Nam, Taek Sang Kwon, Federico Di Biasio, Jaakko Itkonen, Dongkyu Kim, Anja Tuomioja-Busk, Nicolas Van Gelder, David Woods, Minyoung Jang
{"title":"静脉注射英夫利昔单抗液体制剂的预期收益和成本节约:七个欧洲国家的观点。","authors":"Kyoungwan Nam, Taek Sang Kwon, Federico Di Biasio, Jaakko Itkonen, Dongkyu Kim, Anja Tuomioja-Busk, Nicolas Van Gelder, David Woods, Minyoung Jang","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2544756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following the approval of intravenous (IV) infliximab (IFX) in the 1990s, Celltrion developed the first monoclonal antibody biosimilar for IV IFX (Remsima®: Celltrion, South Korea), followed by the first and only subcutaneous IFX, (Remsima® SC). A liquid formulation of IV IFX has been developed that eliminates the need for reconstitution and introduces a 350 mg vial size not previously available with the powder formulation. This study evaluated the operational benefits and cost savings of the liquid formulation of IV IFX compared to the powder formulation, from the perspective of healthcare professionals across seven European countries.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 hospital pharmacists and nurses involved in IV IFX preparation from May to June 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviewees noted that eliminating reconstitution reduced preparation time by 51% and resource costs by 20% per patient episode compared to the powder formulation, significantly alleviating healthcare professionals' workload.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The liquid formulation of IV IFX streamlines preparation, enhances operational efficiency, and reduces costs compared to the powder formulation. These savings allow resource reallocation to patient care, improving cost-effectiveness of IV IFX therapy. Its adoption is expected to optimize healthcare delivery across European healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1017-1024"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived benefits and cost savings of liquid formulation of intravenous infliximab: perspectives of seven European countries.\",\"authors\":\"Kyoungwan Nam, Taek Sang Kwon, Federico Di Biasio, Jaakko Itkonen, Dongkyu Kim, Anja Tuomioja-Busk, Nicolas Van Gelder, David Woods, Minyoung Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14712598.2025.2544756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following the approval of intravenous (IV) infliximab (IFX) in the 1990s, Celltrion developed the first monoclonal antibody biosimilar for IV IFX (Remsima®: Celltrion, South Korea), followed by the first and only subcutaneous IFX, (Remsima® SC). A liquid formulation of IV IFX has been developed that eliminates the need for reconstitution and introduces a 350 mg vial size not previously available with the powder formulation. This study evaluated the operational benefits and cost savings of the liquid formulation of IV IFX compared to the powder formulation, from the perspective of healthcare professionals across seven European countries.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 hospital pharmacists and nurses involved in IV IFX preparation from May to June 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviewees noted that eliminating reconstitution reduced preparation time by 51% and resource costs by 20% per patient episode compared to the powder formulation, significantly alleviating healthcare professionals' workload.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The liquid formulation of IV IFX streamlines preparation, enhances operational efficiency, and reduces costs compared to the powder formulation. These savings allow resource reallocation to patient care, improving cost-effectiveness of IV IFX therapy. Its adoption is expected to optimize healthcare delivery across European healthcare systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1017-1024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2544756\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2544756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perceived benefits and cost savings of liquid formulation of intravenous infliximab: perspectives of seven European countries.
Background: Following the approval of intravenous (IV) infliximab (IFX) in the 1990s, Celltrion developed the first monoclonal antibody biosimilar for IV IFX (Remsima®: Celltrion, South Korea), followed by the first and only subcutaneous IFX, (Remsima® SC). A liquid formulation of IV IFX has been developed that eliminates the need for reconstitution and introduces a 350 mg vial size not previously available with the powder formulation. This study evaluated the operational benefits and cost savings of the liquid formulation of IV IFX compared to the powder formulation, from the perspective of healthcare professionals across seven European countries.
Research design and methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 hospital pharmacists and nurses involved in IV IFX preparation from May to June 2025.
Results: Interviewees noted that eliminating reconstitution reduced preparation time by 51% and resource costs by 20% per patient episode compared to the powder formulation, significantly alleviating healthcare professionals' workload.
Conclusions: The liquid formulation of IV IFX streamlines preparation, enhances operational efficiency, and reduces costs compared to the powder formulation. These savings allow resource reallocation to patient care, improving cost-effectiveness of IV IFX therapy. Its adoption is expected to optimize healthcare delivery across European healthcare systems.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy.
Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development.
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease.
The journal welcomes:
Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine
Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent
Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results;
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.