静脉注射英夫利昔单抗液体制剂的预期收益和成本节约:七个欧洲国家的观点。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1080/14712598.2025.2544756
Kyoungwan Nam, Taek Sang Kwon, Federico Di Biasio, Jaakko Itkonen, Dongkyu Kim, Anja Tuomioja-Busk, Nicolas Van Gelder, David Woods, Minyoung Jang
{"title":"静脉注射英夫利昔单抗液体制剂的预期收益和成本节约:七个欧洲国家的观点。","authors":"Kyoungwan Nam, Taek Sang Kwon, Federico Di Biasio, Jaakko Itkonen, Dongkyu Kim, Anja Tuomioja-Busk, Nicolas Van Gelder, David Woods, Minyoung Jang","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2544756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following the approval of intravenous (IV) infliximab (IFX) in the 1990s, Celltrion developed the first monoclonal antibody biosimilar for IV IFX (Remsima®: Celltrion, South Korea), followed by the first and only subcutaneous IFX, (Remsima® SC). A liquid formulation of IV IFX has been developed that eliminates the need for reconstitution and introduces a 350 mg vial size not previously available with the powder formulation. This study evaluated the operational benefits and cost savings of the liquid formulation of IV IFX compared to the powder formulation, from the perspective of healthcare professionals across seven European countries.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 hospital pharmacists and nurses involved in IV IFX preparation from May to June 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviewees noted that eliminating reconstitution reduced preparation time by 51% and resource costs by 20% per patient episode compared to the powder formulation, significantly alleviating healthcare professionals' workload.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The liquid formulation of IV IFX streamlines preparation, enhances operational efficiency, and reduces costs compared to the powder formulation. These savings allow resource reallocation to patient care, improving cost-effectiveness of IV IFX therapy. Its adoption is expected to optimize healthcare delivery across European healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1017-1024"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived benefits and cost savings of liquid formulation of intravenous infliximab: perspectives of seven European countries.\",\"authors\":\"Kyoungwan Nam, Taek Sang Kwon, Federico Di Biasio, Jaakko Itkonen, Dongkyu Kim, Anja Tuomioja-Busk, Nicolas Van Gelder, David Woods, Minyoung Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14712598.2025.2544756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following the approval of intravenous (IV) infliximab (IFX) in the 1990s, Celltrion developed the first monoclonal antibody biosimilar for IV IFX (Remsima®: Celltrion, South Korea), followed by the first and only subcutaneous IFX, (Remsima® SC). A liquid formulation of IV IFX has been developed that eliminates the need for reconstitution and introduces a 350 mg vial size not previously available with the powder formulation. This study evaluated the operational benefits and cost savings of the liquid formulation of IV IFX compared to the powder formulation, from the perspective of healthcare professionals across seven European countries.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 hospital pharmacists and nurses involved in IV IFX preparation from May to June 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviewees noted that eliminating reconstitution reduced preparation time by 51% and resource costs by 20% per patient episode compared to the powder formulation, significantly alleviating healthcare professionals' workload.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The liquid formulation of IV IFX streamlines preparation, enhances operational efficiency, and reduces costs compared to the powder formulation. These savings allow resource reallocation to patient care, improving cost-effectiveness of IV IFX therapy. Its adoption is expected to optimize healthcare delivery across European healthcare systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1017-1024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2544756\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2544756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:继20世纪90年代静脉(IV)英夫利昔单抗(IFX)获批后,Celltrion开发了第一个IV IFX单克隆抗体生物仿制药(Remsima®:Celltrion,韩国),随后是第一个也是唯一一个皮下IFX (Remsima®SC)。已经开发了IV IFX的液体配方,消除了重构的需要,并引入了以前没有的粉末配方的350mg小瓶尺寸。本研究从七个欧洲国家的医疗保健专业人员的角度评估了IV IFX液体制剂与粉末制剂相比的操作效益和成本节约。研究设计与方法:于2025年5 - 6月对21名参与静脉注射IFX制备的医院药师和护士进行半结构化访谈。结果:受访者指出,与粉末制剂相比,消除重构可使每位患者的准备时间减少51%,资源成本减少20%,显著减轻了卫生保健专业人员的工作量。结论:与散剂型相比,IFX液剂型简化了制备流程,提高了操作效率,降低了成本。这些节省可以使资源重新分配给患者护理,提高静脉注射IFX治疗的成本效益。它的采用有望优化整个欧洲医疗保健系统的医疗保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived benefits and cost savings of liquid formulation of intravenous infliximab: perspectives of seven European countries.

Background: Following the approval of intravenous (IV) infliximab (IFX) in the 1990s, Celltrion developed the first monoclonal antibody biosimilar for IV IFX (Remsima®: Celltrion, South Korea), followed by the first and only subcutaneous IFX, (Remsima® SC). A liquid formulation of IV IFX has been developed that eliminates the need for reconstitution and introduces a 350 mg vial size not previously available with the powder formulation. This study evaluated the operational benefits and cost savings of the liquid formulation of IV IFX compared to the powder formulation, from the perspective of healthcare professionals across seven European countries.

Research design and methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 hospital pharmacists and nurses involved in IV IFX preparation from May to June 2025.

Results: Interviewees noted that eliminating reconstitution reduced preparation time by 51% and resource costs by 20% per patient episode compared to the powder formulation, significantly alleviating healthcare professionals' workload.

Conclusions: The liquid formulation of IV IFX streamlines preparation, enhances operational efficiency, and reduces costs compared to the powder formulation. These savings allow resource reallocation to patient care, improving cost-effectiveness of IV IFX therapy. Its adoption is expected to optimize healthcare delivery across European healthcare systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信