急性缺血性卒中后医疗保险受益人抗癫痫药物的选择及其相关结果。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1111/epi.18594
Julianne D Brooks, Rafaella Cazé de Medeiros, Shuo Sun, Madhav Sankaranarayanan, M Brandon Westover, Lee H Schwamm, Joseph P Newhouse, Sebastien Haneuse, Lidia M V R Moura
{"title":"急性缺血性卒中后医疗保险受益人抗癫痫药物的选择及其相关结果。","authors":"Julianne D Brooks, Rafaella Cazé de Medeiros, Shuo Sun, Madhav Sankaranarayanan, M Brandon Westover, Lee H Schwamm, Joseph P Newhouse, Sebastien Haneuse, Lidia M V R Moura","doi":"10.1111/epi.18594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined choice of outpatient epilepsy-specific antiseizure medication (ESM) after a stroke discharge and outcomes in a sample of US older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this matched cohort study, we analyzed a 20% sample of US Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) between 2009 and 2021 who were discharged home. Individuals met insurance coverage criteria and were not taking ESM before hospitalization. We matched individuals on days from discharge to ESM initiation. Individuals who initiated ESMs other than levetiracetam within 30 days of discharge (n = 229) were matched to levetiracetam initiators (n = 687). We did not include antiseizure medications used for treatment of pain or psychiatric disorders such as gabapentin and benzodiazepines. We investigated the time to seizurelike events, emergency department (ED) visits, and readmissions using a semicompeting risk framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The matched cohort of 916 ESM initiators had a median age of 73 years (interquartile range = 69-81) and was 57% female and 71% non-Hispanic White. Using the semicompeting risk framework, those who received other ESM had a 37% lower hazard of seizurelike events compared to those receiving levetiracetam, given that death had not occurred (hazard ratio = .63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .43-.91). Among other ESM initiators, the hazard of ED visits and hospital readmissions, given that death had not occurred, did not differ significantly from initiating levetiracetam (hazard ratios = 1.00 [95% CI = .80-1.25] and .98 [95% CI = .75-1.28], respectively).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>In a sample of US Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for AIS and discharged home, initiating levetiracetam in the outpatient setting was associated with a higher risk of seizurelike events compared to other ESMs. However, there remains a possibility of residual confounding by indication, as individuals with greater risk of seizures may have been started on levetiracetam. We did not observe significant differences in the risk of ED visits or readmissions, suggesting comparable safety profiles in broader clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice of antiseizure medications and associated outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries after acute ischemic stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Julianne D Brooks, Rafaella Cazé de Medeiros, Shuo Sun, Madhav Sankaranarayanan, M Brandon Westover, Lee H Schwamm, Joseph P Newhouse, Sebastien Haneuse, Lidia M V R Moura\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined choice of outpatient epilepsy-specific antiseizure medication (ESM) after a stroke discharge and outcomes in a sample of US older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this matched cohort study, we analyzed a 20% sample of US Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) between 2009 and 2021 who were discharged home. Individuals met insurance coverage criteria and were not taking ESM before hospitalization. We matched individuals on days from discharge to ESM initiation. Individuals who initiated ESMs other than levetiracetam within 30 days of discharge (n = 229) were matched to levetiracetam initiators (n = 687). We did not include antiseizure medications used for treatment of pain or psychiatric disorders such as gabapentin and benzodiazepines. We investigated the time to seizurelike events, emergency department (ED) visits, and readmissions using a semicompeting risk framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The matched cohort of 916 ESM initiators had a median age of 73 years (interquartile range = 69-81) and was 57% female and 71% non-Hispanic White. Using the semicompeting risk framework, those who received other ESM had a 37% lower hazard of seizurelike events compared to those receiving levetiracetam, given that death had not occurred (hazard ratio = .63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .43-.91). Among other ESM initiators, the hazard of ED visits and hospital readmissions, given that death had not occurred, did not differ significantly from initiating levetiracetam (hazard ratios = 1.00 [95% CI = .80-1.25] and .98 [95% CI = .75-1.28], respectively).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>In a sample of US Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for AIS and discharged home, initiating levetiracetam in the outpatient setting was associated with a higher risk of seizurelike events compared to other ESMs. However, there remains a possibility of residual confounding by indication, as individuals with greater risk of seizures may have been started on levetiracetam. We did not observe significant differences in the risk of ED visits or readmissions, suggesting comparable safety profiles in broader clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18594\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18594","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们研究了美国老年人中风出院后门诊癫痫特异性抗癫痫药物(ESM)的选择和结果。方法:在这项匹配队列研究中,我们分析了2009年至2021年期间因急性缺血性中风(AIS)住院的65岁及以上的美国医疗保险受益人中20%的样本。个人符合保险覆盖标准,并且在住院前没有采取健康管理措施。我们匹配个体从出院到ESM开始的天数。在出院30天内启动非左乙拉西坦esm的个体(n = 229)与左乙拉西坦启动者(n = 687)相匹配。我们没有纳入用于治疗疼痛或精神疾病的抗癫痫药物,如加巴喷丁和苯二氮卓类药物。我们使用半竞争风险框架调查了发作样事件、急诊(ED)就诊和再入院的时间。结果:916例ESM启动者的匹配队列中位年龄为73岁(四分位数间距= 69-81),57%为女性,71%为非西班牙裔白人。使用半竞争风险框架,考虑到未发生死亡,与接受左乙拉西坦的患者相比,接受其他ESM的患者癫痫样事件的风险降低了37%(风险比= 0.63,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.43 - 0.91)。在其他ESM启动者中,在未发生死亡的情况下,急诊科就诊和再入院的风险与启动左乙拉西坦没有显著差异(风险比分别为1.00 [95% CI = 0.80 -1.25]和0.98 [95% CI = 0.75 -1.28])。意义:在一份因AIS住院并出院回家的美国医疗保险受益人样本中,与其他esm相比,在门诊开始使用左乙拉西坦与癫痫样事件的高风险相关。然而,由于癫痫发作风险较大的个体可能已经开始使用左乙拉西坦,因此仍有可能因适应症而产生残留混淆。我们没有观察到急诊科就诊或再入院的风险有显著差异,这表明在更广泛的临床结果中,安全性具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Choice of antiseizure medications and associated outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries after acute ischemic stroke.

Objective: We examined choice of outpatient epilepsy-specific antiseizure medication (ESM) after a stroke discharge and outcomes in a sample of US older adults.

Methods: In this matched cohort study, we analyzed a 20% sample of US Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) between 2009 and 2021 who were discharged home. Individuals met insurance coverage criteria and were not taking ESM before hospitalization. We matched individuals on days from discharge to ESM initiation. Individuals who initiated ESMs other than levetiracetam within 30 days of discharge (n = 229) were matched to levetiracetam initiators (n = 687). We did not include antiseizure medications used for treatment of pain or psychiatric disorders such as gabapentin and benzodiazepines. We investigated the time to seizurelike events, emergency department (ED) visits, and readmissions using a semicompeting risk framework.

Results: The matched cohort of 916 ESM initiators had a median age of 73 years (interquartile range = 69-81) and was 57% female and 71% non-Hispanic White. Using the semicompeting risk framework, those who received other ESM had a 37% lower hazard of seizurelike events compared to those receiving levetiracetam, given that death had not occurred (hazard ratio = .63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .43-.91). Among other ESM initiators, the hazard of ED visits and hospital readmissions, given that death had not occurred, did not differ significantly from initiating levetiracetam (hazard ratios = 1.00 [95% CI = .80-1.25] and .98 [95% CI = .75-1.28], respectively).

Significance: In a sample of US Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for AIS and discharged home, initiating levetiracetam in the outpatient setting was associated with a higher risk of seizurelike events compared to other ESMs. However, there remains a possibility of residual confounding by indication, as individuals with greater risk of seizures may have been started on levetiracetam. We did not observe significant differences in the risk of ED visits or readmissions, suggesting comparable safety profiles in broader clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信