N Abreu-Placeres, P Yunes Fragoso, A Rodriguez, S Martignon, K R Ekstrand, E O Beltrán, A Cortes, G V A Douglas, J T Newton, N B Pitts, C Deery, L E Garrido
{"title":"远程龋齿评估与国际龋齿护理:智能手机和专业相机图像的准确性。","authors":"N Abreu-Placeres, P Yunes Fragoso, A Rodriguez, S Martignon, K R Ekstrand, E O Beltrán, A Cortes, G V A Douglas, J T Newton, N B Pitts, C Deery, L E Garrido","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of remote caries lesion assessment using the CariesCare International (CCI) system applied to images captured with smartphones and professional cameras.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 children aged 5-10 years, who underwent clinical dental examinations and intraoral photography using both a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera and a smartphone. Trained examiners, blinded to the imaging devices, assessed the photographs and in-person examinations, with the latter serving as the gold standard. Statistical analyses included weighted kappa ( <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>κ</mi> <mi>w</mi></msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\kappa}_w $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) to evaluate inter-examiner reproducibility, along with sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to determine detection accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-examiner reproducibility was excellent across all methods ( <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>κ</mi> <mi>w</mi></msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\kappa}_w $$</annotation></semantics> </math> > 0.94). The professional camera demonstrated superior accuracy (Se = 0.87, Sp = 0.98; AUC = 0.92), with strong performance even for initial lesions (AUC = 0.88). Smartphone images showed good overall accuracy (Se = 0.73, Sp = 0.92, AUC = 0.83), performing particularly well for moderate and extensive lesions (AUC ≥ 0.87) and acceptably for initial lesions (AUC = 0.77). Both imaging methods achieved high specificity, reflecting accurate identification of sound surfaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the use of both professional and smartphone photography as effective tools for remote caries lesion assessment using the CariesCare International (CCI) system. Smartphone-based assessments represent a cost-effective and accessible alternative, especially in settings with limited resources. Integrating standardised systems like CCI into remote diagnostic workflows enhances diagnostic accuracy and can broaden access to dental care, helping reduce global oral health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote Caries Assessment With CariesCare International: Accuracy of Smartphone and Professional Camera Images.\",\"authors\":\"N Abreu-Placeres, P Yunes Fragoso, A Rodriguez, S Martignon, K R Ekstrand, E O Beltrán, A Cortes, G V A Douglas, J T Newton, N B Pitts, C Deery, L E Garrido\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cdoe.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of remote caries lesion assessment using the CariesCare International (CCI) system applied to images captured with smartphones and professional cameras.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 children aged 5-10 years, who underwent clinical dental examinations and intraoral photography using both a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera and a smartphone. Trained examiners, blinded to the imaging devices, assessed the photographs and in-person examinations, with the latter serving as the gold standard. Statistical analyses included weighted kappa ( <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>κ</mi> <mi>w</mi></msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\kappa}_w $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) to evaluate inter-examiner reproducibility, along with sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to determine detection accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-examiner reproducibility was excellent across all methods ( <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>κ</mi> <mi>w</mi></msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\kappa}_w $$</annotation></semantics> </math> > 0.94). The professional camera demonstrated superior accuracy (Se = 0.87, Sp = 0.98; AUC = 0.92), with strong performance even for initial lesions (AUC = 0.88). Smartphone images showed good overall accuracy (Se = 0.73, Sp = 0.92, AUC = 0.83), performing particularly well for moderate and extensive lesions (AUC ≥ 0.87) and acceptably for initial lesions (AUC = 0.77). Both imaging methods achieved high specificity, reflecting accurate identification of sound surfaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the use of both professional and smartphone photography as effective tools for remote caries lesion assessment using the CariesCare International (CCI) system. Smartphone-based assessments represent a cost-effective and accessible alternative, especially in settings with limited resources. Integrating standardised systems like CCI into remote diagnostic workflows enhances diagnostic accuracy and can broaden access to dental care, helping reduce global oral health disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.70017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.70017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Remote Caries Assessment With CariesCare International: Accuracy of Smartphone and Professional Camera Images.
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of remote caries lesion assessment using the CariesCare International (CCI) system applied to images captured with smartphones and professional cameras.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 children aged 5-10 years, who underwent clinical dental examinations and intraoral photography using both a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera and a smartphone. Trained examiners, blinded to the imaging devices, assessed the photographs and in-person examinations, with the latter serving as the gold standard. Statistical analyses included weighted kappa ( ) to evaluate inter-examiner reproducibility, along with sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to determine detection accuracy.
Results: Inter-examiner reproducibility was excellent across all methods ( > 0.94). The professional camera demonstrated superior accuracy (Se = 0.87, Sp = 0.98; AUC = 0.92), with strong performance even for initial lesions (AUC = 0.88). Smartphone images showed good overall accuracy (Se = 0.73, Sp = 0.92, AUC = 0.83), performing particularly well for moderate and extensive lesions (AUC ≥ 0.87) and acceptably for initial lesions (AUC = 0.77). Both imaging methods achieved high specificity, reflecting accurate identification of sound surfaces.
Conclusions: These findings support the use of both professional and smartphone photography as effective tools for remote caries lesion assessment using the CariesCare International (CCI) system. Smartphone-based assessments represent a cost-effective and accessible alternative, especially in settings with limited resources. Integrating standardised systems like CCI into remote diagnostic workflows enhances diagnostic accuracy and can broaden access to dental care, helping reduce global oral health disparities.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome.
The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry.
The journal is published bimonthly.