远程龋齿评估与国际龋齿护理:智能手机和专业相机图像的准确性。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
N Abreu-Placeres, P Yunes Fragoso, A Rodriguez, S Martignon, K R Ekstrand, E O Beltrán, A Cortes, G V A Douglas, J T Newton, N B Pitts, C Deery, L E Garrido
{"title":"远程龋齿评估与国际龋齿护理:智能手机和专业相机图像的准确性。","authors":"N Abreu-Placeres, P Yunes Fragoso, A Rodriguez, S Martignon, K R Ekstrand, E O Beltrán, A Cortes, G V A Douglas, J T Newton, N B Pitts, C Deery, L E Garrido","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of remote caries lesion assessment using the CariesCare International (CCI) system applied to images captured with smartphones and professional cameras.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 children aged 5-10 years, who underwent clinical dental examinations and intraoral photography using both a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera and a smartphone. Trained examiners, blinded to the imaging devices, assessed the photographs and in-person examinations, with the latter serving as the gold standard. Statistical analyses included weighted kappa ( <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>κ</mi> <mi>w</mi></msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\kappa}_w $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) to evaluate inter-examiner reproducibility, along with sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to determine detection accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-examiner reproducibility was excellent across all methods ( <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>κ</mi> <mi>w</mi></msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\kappa}_w $$</annotation></semantics> </math> > 0.94). The professional camera demonstrated superior accuracy (Se = 0.87, Sp = 0.98; AUC = 0.92), with strong performance even for initial lesions (AUC = 0.88). Smartphone images showed good overall accuracy (Se = 0.73, Sp = 0.92, AUC = 0.83), performing particularly well for moderate and extensive lesions (AUC ≥ 0.87) and acceptably for initial lesions (AUC = 0.77). Both imaging methods achieved high specificity, reflecting accurate identification of sound surfaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the use of both professional and smartphone photography as effective tools for remote caries lesion assessment using the CariesCare International (CCI) system. Smartphone-based assessments represent a cost-effective and accessible alternative, especially in settings with limited resources. Integrating standardised systems like CCI into remote diagnostic workflows enhances diagnostic accuracy and can broaden access to dental care, helping reduce global oral health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote Caries Assessment With CariesCare International: Accuracy of Smartphone and Professional Camera Images.\",\"authors\":\"N Abreu-Placeres, P Yunes Fragoso, A Rodriguez, S Martignon, K R Ekstrand, E O Beltrán, A Cortes, G V A Douglas, J T Newton, N B Pitts, C Deery, L E Garrido\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cdoe.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of remote caries lesion assessment using the CariesCare International (CCI) system applied to images captured with smartphones and professional cameras.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 children aged 5-10 years, who underwent clinical dental examinations and intraoral photography using both a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera and a smartphone. Trained examiners, blinded to the imaging devices, assessed the photographs and in-person examinations, with the latter serving as the gold standard. Statistical analyses included weighted kappa ( <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>κ</mi> <mi>w</mi></msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\kappa}_w $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) to evaluate inter-examiner reproducibility, along with sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to determine detection accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-examiner reproducibility was excellent across all methods ( <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>κ</mi> <mi>w</mi></msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\\\kappa}_w $$</annotation></semantics> </math> > 0.94). The professional camera demonstrated superior accuracy (Se = 0.87, Sp = 0.98; AUC = 0.92), with strong performance even for initial lesions (AUC = 0.88). Smartphone images showed good overall accuracy (Se = 0.73, Sp = 0.92, AUC = 0.83), performing particularly well for moderate and extensive lesions (AUC ≥ 0.87) and acceptably for initial lesions (AUC = 0.77). Both imaging methods achieved high specificity, reflecting accurate identification of sound surfaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the use of both professional and smartphone photography as effective tools for remote caries lesion assessment using the CariesCare International (CCI) system. Smartphone-based assessments represent a cost-effective and accessible alternative, especially in settings with limited resources. Integrating standardised systems like CCI into remote diagnostic workflows enhances diagnostic accuracy and can broaden access to dental care, helping reduce global oral health disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.70017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.70017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价CariesCare International (CCI)系统应用于智能手机和专业相机图像的远程龋损评估的准确性。方法:对30名5-10岁的儿童进行横断面研究,使用数码单反(DSLR)相机和智能手机进行临床牙科检查和口内摄影。训练有素的审查员,对成像设备视而不见,评估照片和亲自检查,后者作为黄金标准。统计分析包括加权kappa (κ w $$ {\kappa}_w $$)来评估检查者之间的可重复性,以及灵敏度(Se)、特异性(Sp)和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来确定检测准确性。结果:所有方法间的重复性都很好(κ w $$ {\kappa}_w $$ > 0.94)。专业相机显示出优越的精度(Se = 0.87, Sp = 0.98;AUC = 0.92),即使在初始病变(AUC = 0.88)也有很强的表现。智能手机图像显示出良好的整体准确性(Se = 0.73, Sp = 0.92, AUC = 0.83),对中度和广泛病变(AUC≥0.87)表现特别好,对初始病变(AUC = 0.77)也可以接受。两种成像方法都具有很高的特异性,反映了对声表面的准确识别。结论:这些发现支持使用专业和智能手机摄影作为使用国际龋齿护理(CCI)系统进行远程龋齿损害评估的有效工具。基于智能手机的评估是一种具有成本效益和可获得的替代方案,特别是在资源有限的环境中。将CCI等标准化系统集成到远程诊断工作流程中可提高诊断准确性,并可扩大获得牙科保健的机会,有助于缩小全球口腔卫生差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remote Caries Assessment With CariesCare International: Accuracy of Smartphone and Professional Camera Images.

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of remote caries lesion assessment using the CariesCare International (CCI) system applied to images captured with smartphones and professional cameras.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 30 children aged 5-10 years, who underwent clinical dental examinations and intraoral photography using both a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera and a smartphone. Trained examiners, blinded to the imaging devices, assessed the photographs and in-person examinations, with the latter serving as the gold standard. Statistical analyses included weighted kappa ( κ w $$ {\kappa}_w $$ ) to evaluate inter-examiner reproducibility, along with sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to determine detection accuracy.

Results: Inter-examiner reproducibility was excellent across all methods ( κ w $$ {\kappa}_w $$ > 0.94). The professional camera demonstrated superior accuracy (Se = 0.87, Sp = 0.98; AUC = 0.92), with strong performance even for initial lesions (AUC = 0.88). Smartphone images showed good overall accuracy (Se = 0.73, Sp = 0.92, AUC = 0.83), performing particularly well for moderate and extensive lesions (AUC ≥ 0.87) and acceptably for initial lesions (AUC = 0.77). Both imaging methods achieved high specificity, reflecting accurate identification of sound surfaces.

Conclusions: These findings support the use of both professional and smartphone photography as effective tools for remote caries lesion assessment using the CariesCare International (CCI) system. Smartphone-based assessments represent a cost-effective and accessible alternative, especially in settings with limited resources. Integrating standardised systems like CCI into remote diagnostic workflows enhances diagnostic accuracy and can broaden access to dental care, helping reduce global oral health disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome. The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信