{"title":"慢性肾脏疾病强化与非强化血压控制:临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Parisa Fallahtafti, Davood Semirani-Nezhad, Saba Maleki, Sahar Zafarmandi, Parham Dastjerdi, Soheil Rahmati, Khatere Roozbehi, Farhad Shaker, Mehra Fekri, Michael Nanna, Jishanth Mattumpuram, Kaveh Hosseini, Hamidreza Soleimani","doi":"10.1159/000547812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High blood pressure accelerates chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, but the optimal intensity of blood pressure control in this population remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether intensive blood pressure control, compared to less-intensive control, improves clinical outcomes in individuals with CKD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted through December 2024. Randomized controlled trials comparing intensive versus standard blood pressure targets in patients with CKD stage 3 or higher were included. Eligible studies reported all-cause mortality and at least one cardiovascular or renal outcome. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A random-effects model was used to pool risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the baseline systolic blood pressure, inclusion of diabetic patients versus exclusion, and baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven randomized controlled trials with 8,740 participants were included. Intensive blood pressure control did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality (6.4% vs. 6.9%; RR, 0.91 [95% CI 0.73-1.13]; p = 0.32), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.89 [95% CI 0.69-1.15]; p = 0.3), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 0.91 [95% CI 0.69-1.20]; p = 0.27), decline in kidney function (RR, 0.86 [95% CI 0.59-1.25]; p = 0.34), or progression to end-stage kidney disease (RR, 1.00 [95% CI 0.81-1.23]; p = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intensive BP control did not improve overall mortality or renal outcomes in CKD patients. Further large, long-term studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7570,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensive versus Less-Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Parisa Fallahtafti, Davood Semirani-Nezhad, Saba Maleki, Sahar Zafarmandi, Parham Dastjerdi, Soheil Rahmati, Khatere Roozbehi, Farhad Shaker, Mehra Fekri, Michael Nanna, Jishanth Mattumpuram, Kaveh Hosseini, Hamidreza Soleimani\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000547812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High blood pressure accelerates chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, but the optimal intensity of blood pressure control in this population remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether intensive blood pressure control, compared to less-intensive control, improves clinical outcomes in individuals with CKD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted through December 2024. Randomized controlled trials comparing intensive versus standard blood pressure targets in patients with CKD stage 3 or higher were included. Eligible studies reported all-cause mortality and at least one cardiovascular or renal outcome. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A random-effects model was used to pool risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the baseline systolic blood pressure, inclusion of diabetic patients versus exclusion, and baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven randomized controlled trials with 8,740 participants were included. Intensive blood pressure control did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality (6.4% vs. 6.9%; RR, 0.91 [95% CI 0.73-1.13]; p = 0.32), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.89 [95% CI 0.69-1.15]; p = 0.3), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 0.91 [95% CI 0.69-1.20]; p = 0.27), decline in kidney function (RR, 0.86 [95% CI 0.59-1.25]; p = 0.34), or progression to end-stage kidney disease (RR, 1.00 [95% CI 0.81-1.23]; p = 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intensive BP control did not improve overall mortality or renal outcomes in CKD patients. Further large, long-term studies are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547812\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547812","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:慢性肾脏疾病(CKD) 3期或以上患者的最佳血压(BP)目标仍然存在争议,与标准对照相比,强化血压控制是否能改善结果尚不确定。摘要:本系统综述和荟萃分析包括11项随机对照试验(RCTs), 8,740名参与者,比较CKD 3+期患者的强化和标准血压目标。使用随机效应模型的荟萃分析显示,强化控制的全因死亡率没有显著降低(RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.73-1.13)。同样,其他结果也没有显著差异。关键信息:强化血压控制并不能改善CKD患者的总死亡率或肾脏结局。进一步的大规模长期研究是有必要的。
Intensive versus Less-Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Introduction: High blood pressure accelerates chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, but the optimal intensity of blood pressure control in this population remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether intensive blood pressure control, compared to less-intensive control, improves clinical outcomes in individuals with CKD.
Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted through December 2024. Randomized controlled trials comparing intensive versus standard blood pressure targets in patients with CKD stage 3 or higher were included. Eligible studies reported all-cause mortality and at least one cardiovascular or renal outcome. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A random-effects model was used to pool risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the baseline systolic blood pressure, inclusion of diabetic patients versus exclusion, and baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR).
Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials with 8,740 participants were included. Intensive blood pressure control did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality (6.4% vs. 6.9%; RR, 0.91 [95% CI 0.73-1.13]; p = 0.32), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.89 [95% CI 0.69-1.15]; p = 0.3), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 0.91 [95% CI 0.69-1.20]; p = 0.27), decline in kidney function (RR, 0.86 [95% CI 0.59-1.25]; p = 0.34), or progression to end-stage kidney disease (RR, 1.00 [95% CI 0.81-1.23]; p = 0.99).
Conclusions: Intensive BP control did not improve overall mortality or renal outcomes in CKD patients. Further large, long-term studies are warranted.
期刊介绍:
The ''American Journal of Nephrology'' is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on timely topics in both basic science and clinical research. Papers are divided into several sections, including: