卡非佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松与来那度胺-地塞米松在新诊断的不适合自体干细胞移植(EMN20)的骨髓瘤患者中的疗效:一项随机、开放标签、多中心、3期试验

Sara Bringhen,Lorenzo Cani,Elisabetta Antonioli,Daniele Derudas,Francesca Fazio,Alessandra Larocca,Sonia Ronconi,Claudia Cellini,Antonietta Pia Falcone,Fabrizio Accardi,Anna Marina Liberati,Piero Galieni,Angelo Belotti,Anna Maria Cafro,Roberto Ria,Giulia Benevolo,Iolanda Donatella Vincelli,Donato Mannina,Flavia Lotti,Benedetto Bruno,Vincenzo Marasco,Rita Mazza,Patrizia Tosi,Elena Rivolti,Mario Boccadoro,Mattia D'Agostino
{"title":"卡非佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松与来那度胺-地塞米松在新诊断的不适合自体干细胞移植(EMN20)的骨髓瘤患者中的疗效:一项随机、开放标签、多中心、3期试验","authors":"Sara Bringhen,Lorenzo Cani,Elisabetta Antonioli,Daniele Derudas,Francesca Fazio,Alessandra Larocca,Sonia Ronconi,Claudia Cellini,Antonietta Pia Falcone,Fabrizio Accardi,Anna Marina Liberati,Piero Galieni,Angelo Belotti,Anna Maria Cafro,Roberto Ria,Giulia Benevolo,Iolanda Donatella Vincelli,Donato Mannina,Flavia Lotti,Benedetto Bruno,Vincenzo Marasco,Rita Mazza,Patrizia Tosi,Elena Rivolti,Mario Boccadoro,Mattia D'Agostino","doi":"10.1016/s2352-3026(25)00162-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nBefore the introduction of daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone as a first-line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma, lenalidomide-dexamethasone was a standard of care. We aimed to explore whether addition of the second-generation proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib to lenalidomide-dexamethasone improved the rates of measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity and progression-free survival.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nEMN20 is a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial comparing weekly carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma, conducted in 27 centres in Italy. Key inclusion criteria included fit or intermediate-fit status according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty score, measurable disease according to IMWG criteria, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status lower than 3. Patients randomly assigned to the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone group received 28-day carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone cycles (carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 for cycle 1, followed by 56 mg/m2 intravenously on days 8 and 15 for cycle 1, then 56 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 for cycles 2-12, and 56 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 15 from cycle 13 until 5 years after randomisation; lenalidomide 25 mg orally on days 1-21 until disease progression or intolerance; dexamethasone 40 mg orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 until disease progression or intolerance). Patients assigned to the lenalidomide-dexamethasone group received 28-day cycles with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (same dosing and schedule used in the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone group). Primary endpoints were MRD negativity by next-generation sequencing (sensitivity 10-5) after 2 years of treatment and progression-free survival; and were assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (all patients who were eligible to receive treatment and who were randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups). On Nov 23, 2021, after enrolling 30% of planned patients (101/340), the trial was prematurely stopped due to the introduction of daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone as a first-line treatment in Italy, which caused the lenalidomide-dexamethasone control group to no longer be considered a standard treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04096066, and study recruitment is complete.\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nBetween Nov 14, 2019, and Nov 23, 2021, 82 of 101 enrolled patients were assessed for eligibility and were randomised to receive carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (n=42) or lenalidomide-dexamethasone (n=40). In the ITT population, 35 (43%) of 82 patients were female and 47 (57%) were male. At data cutoff (March 29, 2024), the median follow-up was 35·2 months (IQR 30·3-38·7). The 2-year MRD negativity rates were 25 (60% 95% CI 43-74) of 42 patients with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus 0 (0%; 0-9) of 40 patients with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (p<0·0001). Median progression-free survival was not reached (not reached-not reached) with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus 20·9 months (15·7-not reached) with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (hazard ratio 0·24 [95% CI 0·11-0·56], p=0·00084). One patient was excluded from the safety analysis because they died before starting treatment. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (nine [22%] of 41 patients), thrombocytopenia (four [10%]), diarrhoea (four [10%]), cardiac events (three [7%]), infections (three [7%]), and arterial hypertension (two [5%]) with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone, and neutropenia (six [15%] of 40) and skin rash (four [10%]) with lenalidomide-dexamethasone. The most common serious adverse event was SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia in both the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone group (two [5%] of 41 patients) and lenalidomide-dexamethasone group (three [7%] of 40 patients). Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to death were observed in two patients in the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (two SARS-CoV-2 infections) and four patients in the lenalidomide-dexamethasone group (one acute myocardial infraction, one heart failure, one septic shock, and one SARS-CoV-2 infection).\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nWith the limitation of a smaller sample size than planned due to the trial's early interruption, these results, to our knowledge, showed for the first-time high rates of MRD negativity with weekly carfilzomib added to lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with transplantation-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. In the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone group, higher MRD negativity rates were associated with a progression-free survival advantage over lenalidomide-dexamethasone. Toxicities were predictable and generally manageable.\r\n\r\nFUNDING\r\nAmgen, Bristol Myers Squibb.","PeriodicalId":501011,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Haematology","volume":"16 1","pages":"e621-e634"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation (EMN20): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Bringhen,Lorenzo Cani,Elisabetta Antonioli,Daniele Derudas,Francesca Fazio,Alessandra Larocca,Sonia Ronconi,Claudia Cellini,Antonietta Pia Falcone,Fabrizio Accardi,Anna Marina Liberati,Piero Galieni,Angelo Belotti,Anna Maria Cafro,Roberto Ria,Giulia Benevolo,Iolanda Donatella Vincelli,Donato Mannina,Flavia Lotti,Benedetto Bruno,Vincenzo Marasco,Rita Mazza,Patrizia Tosi,Elena Rivolti,Mario Boccadoro,Mattia D'Agostino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s2352-3026(25)00162-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nBefore the introduction of daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone as a first-line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma, lenalidomide-dexamethasone was a standard of care. We aimed to explore whether addition of the second-generation proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib to lenalidomide-dexamethasone improved the rates of measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity and progression-free survival.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nEMN20 is a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial comparing weekly carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma, conducted in 27 centres in Italy. Key inclusion criteria included fit or intermediate-fit status according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty score, measurable disease according to IMWG criteria, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status lower than 3. Patients randomly assigned to the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone group received 28-day carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone cycles (carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 for cycle 1, followed by 56 mg/m2 intravenously on days 8 and 15 for cycle 1, then 56 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 for cycles 2-12, and 56 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 15 from cycle 13 until 5 years after randomisation; lenalidomide 25 mg orally on days 1-21 until disease progression or intolerance; dexamethasone 40 mg orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 until disease progression or intolerance). Patients assigned to the lenalidomide-dexamethasone group received 28-day cycles with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (same dosing and schedule used in the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone group). Primary endpoints were MRD negativity by next-generation sequencing (sensitivity 10-5) after 2 years of treatment and progression-free survival; and were assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (all patients who were eligible to receive treatment and who were randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups). On Nov 23, 2021, after enrolling 30% of planned patients (101/340), the trial was prematurely stopped due to the introduction of daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone as a first-line treatment in Italy, which caused the lenalidomide-dexamethasone control group to no longer be considered a standard treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04096066, and study recruitment is complete.\\r\\n\\r\\nFINDINGS\\r\\nBetween Nov 14, 2019, and Nov 23, 2021, 82 of 101 enrolled patients were assessed for eligibility and were randomised to receive carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (n=42) or lenalidomide-dexamethasone (n=40). In the ITT population, 35 (43%) of 82 patients were female and 47 (57%) were male. At data cutoff (March 29, 2024), the median follow-up was 35·2 months (IQR 30·3-38·7). The 2-year MRD negativity rates were 25 (60% 95% CI 43-74) of 42 patients with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus 0 (0%; 0-9) of 40 patients with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (p<0·0001). Median progression-free survival was not reached (not reached-not reached) with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus 20·9 months (15·7-not reached) with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (hazard ratio 0·24 [95% CI 0·11-0·56], p=0·00084). One patient was excluded from the safety analysis because they died before starting treatment. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (nine [22%] of 41 patients), thrombocytopenia (four [10%]), diarrhoea (four [10%]), cardiac events (three [7%]), infections (three [7%]), and arterial hypertension (two [5%]) with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone, and neutropenia (six [15%] of 40) and skin rash (four [10%]) with lenalidomide-dexamethasone. The most common serious adverse event was SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia in both the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone group (two [5%] of 41 patients) and lenalidomide-dexamethasone group (three [7%] of 40 patients). Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to death were observed in two patients in the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (two SARS-CoV-2 infections) and four patients in the lenalidomide-dexamethasone group (one acute myocardial infraction, one heart failure, one septic shock, and one SARS-CoV-2 infection).\\r\\n\\r\\nINTERPRETATION\\r\\nWith the limitation of a smaller sample size than planned due to the trial's early interruption, these results, to our knowledge, showed for the first-time high rates of MRD negativity with weekly carfilzomib added to lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with transplantation-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. In the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone group, higher MRD negativity rates were associated with a progression-free survival advantage over lenalidomide-dexamethasone. Toxicities were predictable and generally manageable.\\r\\n\\r\\nFUNDING\\r\\nAmgen, Bristol Myers Squibb.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet Haematology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"e621-e634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-3026(25)00162-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-3026(25)00162-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在引入daratumumab-来那度胺-地塞米松作为新诊断的不适合移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者的一线治疗之前,来那度胺-地塞米松是一种标准治疗。我们的目的是探讨在来那度胺地塞米松中加入第二代蛋白酶体抑制剂卡非佐米是否能改善可测量残留疾病(MRD)阴性率和无进展生存率。semn20是一项随机、开放标签、多中心、3期试验,在意大利的27个中心进行,比较carfilzomb -来那度胺-地塞米松与来那度胺-地塞米松对新诊断的不适合移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者的治疗效果。主要纳入标准包括根据国际骨髓瘤工作组(IMWG)虚弱评分的适合或中等适合状态,根据IMWG标准可测量的疾病,以及东部肿瘤合作组的表现状态低于3。随机分配到卡非佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松组的患者接受28天的卡非佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松周期治疗(第1周期第1天静脉注射卡非佐米20mg /m2,第1周期第8天和第15天静脉注射56 mg/m2,第2-12周期静脉注射56 mg/m2,第1、8和15天静脉注射56 mg/m2,第13周期至第5年静脉注射56 mg/m2;来那度胺25 mg, 1-21天口服,直至疾病进展或不耐受;地塞米松40mg口服(第1、8、15和22天,直到疾病进展或不耐受)。来那度胺-地塞米松组患者接受来那度胺-地塞米松28天周期治疗(与卡非佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松组相同的剂量和方案)。主要终点是治疗2年后的MRD阴性(敏感性10-5)和无进展生存期;并在意向治疗(ITT)人群中进行评估(所有有资格接受治疗的患者,并随机分配到其中一个治疗组)。2021年11月23日,在纳入30%的计划患者(101/340)后,由于在意大利引入达拉图单抗-来那度胺-地塞米松作为一线治疗,该试验过早停止,这导致来那度胺-地塞米松对照组不再被视为标准治疗。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT04096066,研究招募已完成。在2019年11月14日至2021年11月23日期间,101名入组患者中有82名接受了资格评估,并随机分配接受卡非佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松治疗(n=42)或来那度胺-地塞米松治疗(n=40)。在ITT人群中,82例患者中有35例(43%)为女性,47例(57%)为男性。截至数据截止日期(2024年3月29日),中位随访时间为35.2个月(IQR 30.3 - 38.7)。42例卡非佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松组患者的2年MRD阴性率为25 (60% 95% CI 43-74)对0 (0%;来那度胺地塞米松组40例患者中0 ~ 9例)(p< 0.0001)。卡非佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松组的中位无进展生存期未达到(未达到-未达到),而来那度胺-地塞米松组的中位无进展生存期为20.9个月(15.7个月)(风险比0.24 [95% CI 0.11 - 0.56], p= 0.00084)。一名患者被排除在安全性分析之外,因为他们在开始治疗前死亡。最常见的3级或更严重不良事件是卡非佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松组中性粒细胞减少症(41例患者中9例[22%])、血小板减少症(4例[10%])、腹泻(4例[10%])、心脏事件(3例[7%])、感染(3例[7%])和动脉高血压(2例[5%]),来那度胺-地塞米松组中性粒细胞减少症(40例患者中6例[15%])和皮疹(4例[10%])。在卡非佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松组(41例患者中2例[5%])和来那度胺-地塞米松组(40例患者中3例[7%])中,最常见的严重不良事件是sars - cov -2相关肺炎。卡非佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松组有2例患者(2例SARS-CoV-2感染)和来那度胺-地塞米松组有4例患者(1例急性心肌梗死、1例心力衰竭、1例感染性休克和1例SARS-CoV-2感染)出现治疗后出现的不良事件导致死亡。解释:由于试验早期中断,样本量比计划的要小,据我们所知,这些结果首次显示,在不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者中,每周在来那度胺-地塞米松基础上添加卡非佐米的MRD阴性率很高。在卡非佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松组中,与来那度胺-地塞米松相比,较高的MRD阴性率与无进展生存优势相关。毒性是可预测的,通常是可控的。安进,百时美施贵宝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation (EMN20): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.
BACKGROUND Before the introduction of daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone as a first-line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma, lenalidomide-dexamethasone was a standard of care. We aimed to explore whether addition of the second-generation proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib to lenalidomide-dexamethasone improved the rates of measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity and progression-free survival. METHODS EMN20 is a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial comparing weekly carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma, conducted in 27 centres in Italy. Key inclusion criteria included fit or intermediate-fit status according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty score, measurable disease according to IMWG criteria, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status lower than 3. Patients randomly assigned to the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone group received 28-day carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone cycles (carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 for cycle 1, followed by 56 mg/m2 intravenously on days 8 and 15 for cycle 1, then 56 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 for cycles 2-12, and 56 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 15 from cycle 13 until 5 years after randomisation; lenalidomide 25 mg orally on days 1-21 until disease progression or intolerance; dexamethasone 40 mg orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 until disease progression or intolerance). Patients assigned to the lenalidomide-dexamethasone group received 28-day cycles with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (same dosing and schedule used in the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone group). Primary endpoints were MRD negativity by next-generation sequencing (sensitivity 10-5) after 2 years of treatment and progression-free survival; and were assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (all patients who were eligible to receive treatment and who were randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups). On Nov 23, 2021, after enrolling 30% of planned patients (101/340), the trial was prematurely stopped due to the introduction of daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone as a first-line treatment in Italy, which caused the lenalidomide-dexamethasone control group to no longer be considered a standard treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04096066, and study recruitment is complete. FINDINGS Between Nov 14, 2019, and Nov 23, 2021, 82 of 101 enrolled patients were assessed for eligibility and were randomised to receive carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (n=42) or lenalidomide-dexamethasone (n=40). In the ITT population, 35 (43%) of 82 patients were female and 47 (57%) were male. At data cutoff (March 29, 2024), the median follow-up was 35·2 months (IQR 30·3-38·7). The 2-year MRD negativity rates were 25 (60% 95% CI 43-74) of 42 patients with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus 0 (0%; 0-9) of 40 patients with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (p<0·0001). Median progression-free survival was not reached (not reached-not reached) with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus 20·9 months (15·7-not reached) with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (hazard ratio 0·24 [95% CI 0·11-0·56], p=0·00084). One patient was excluded from the safety analysis because they died before starting treatment. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (nine [22%] of 41 patients), thrombocytopenia (four [10%]), diarrhoea (four [10%]), cardiac events (three [7%]), infections (three [7%]), and arterial hypertension (two [5%]) with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone, and neutropenia (six [15%] of 40) and skin rash (four [10%]) with lenalidomide-dexamethasone. The most common serious adverse event was SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia in both the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone group (two [5%] of 41 patients) and lenalidomide-dexamethasone group (three [7%] of 40 patients). Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to death were observed in two patients in the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (two SARS-CoV-2 infections) and four patients in the lenalidomide-dexamethasone group (one acute myocardial infraction, one heart failure, one septic shock, and one SARS-CoV-2 infection). INTERPRETATION With the limitation of a smaller sample size than planned due to the trial's early interruption, these results, to our knowledge, showed for the first-time high rates of MRD negativity with weekly carfilzomib added to lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with transplantation-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. In the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone group, higher MRD negativity rates were associated with a progression-free survival advantage over lenalidomide-dexamethasone. Toxicities were predictable and generally manageable. FUNDING Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信