Ali Borekci, Pinar Kuru Bektasoglu, Erhan Çelikoğlu
{"title":"颈椎后路椎弓根螺钉置入的疗效:一项单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Ali Borekci, Pinar Kuru Bektasoglu, Erhan Çelikoğlu","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2025.83686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical pedicle screws offer biomechanical advantages over other stabilization systems. However, their placement carries a relatively high risk of vascular or neurological injury due to individual differences and the complex structure of the cervical spine. Therefore, understanding patient-specific anatomy is crucial for the safe and accurate placement of pedicle screws. In this study, we present our single-center case series over a seven-year period involving cervical pedicle screw placement in subaxial cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent cervical subaxial pedicle screw placement between 2017 and 2024. A freehand surgical technique was employed, using a mini-laminotomy approach to ensure safe screw placement. During the procedure, the medial, superior, and inferior borders of the pedicle were palpated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70 cases were analyzed retrospectively. Fifty patients were male, and 20 were female. The patients ranged in age from 20 to 89 years (median age: 64 years). Fifty-seven patients (81.5%) had cervical stenosis as the surgical indication. Of the remaining cases, 11 patients had fractures and two had tumors. Among the 468 pedicle screws placed, 434 were graded as 0-1. The correct placement rate was 92.7%. Thirty-four screws were malpositioned (grade 2-3), representing a rate of 7.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our case series, the accuracy of cervical subaxial pedicle screw placement was high. We believe that achieving this level of accuracy requires a strong understanding of anatomy, three-dimensional spatial awareness, and surgical experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":"31 8","pages":"798-803"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12363150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of cervical cases operated with posterior cervical pedicle screw placement: a single-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Borekci, Pinar Kuru Bektasoglu, Erhan Çelikoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/tjtes.2025.83686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical pedicle screws offer biomechanical advantages over other stabilization systems. However, their placement carries a relatively high risk of vascular or neurological injury due to individual differences and the complex structure of the cervical spine. Therefore, understanding patient-specific anatomy is crucial for the safe and accurate placement of pedicle screws. In this study, we present our single-center case series over a seven-year period involving cervical pedicle screw placement in subaxial cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent cervical subaxial pedicle screw placement between 2017 and 2024. A freehand surgical technique was employed, using a mini-laminotomy approach to ensure safe screw placement. During the procedure, the medial, superior, and inferior borders of the pedicle were palpated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70 cases were analyzed retrospectively. Fifty patients were male, and 20 were female. The patients ranged in age from 20 to 89 years (median age: 64 years). Fifty-seven patients (81.5%) had cervical stenosis as the surgical indication. Of the remaining cases, 11 patients had fractures and two had tumors. Among the 468 pedicle screws placed, 434 were graded as 0-1. The correct placement rate was 92.7%. Thirty-four screws were malpositioned (grade 2-3), representing a rate of 7.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our case series, the accuracy of cervical subaxial pedicle screw placement was high. We believe that achieving this level of accuracy requires a strong understanding of anatomy, three-dimensional spatial awareness, and surgical experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES\",\"volume\":\"31 8\",\"pages\":\"798-803\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12363150/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.83686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2025.83686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcome of cervical cases operated with posterior cervical pedicle screw placement: a single-center retrospective study.
Background: Cervical pedicle screws offer biomechanical advantages over other stabilization systems. However, their placement carries a relatively high risk of vascular or neurological injury due to individual differences and the complex structure of the cervical spine. Therefore, understanding patient-specific anatomy is crucial for the safe and accurate placement of pedicle screws. In this study, we present our single-center case series over a seven-year period involving cervical pedicle screw placement in subaxial cases.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent cervical subaxial pedicle screw placement between 2017 and 2024. A freehand surgical technique was employed, using a mini-laminotomy approach to ensure safe screw placement. During the procedure, the medial, superior, and inferior borders of the pedicle were palpated.
Results: A total of 70 cases were analyzed retrospectively. Fifty patients were male, and 20 were female. The patients ranged in age from 20 to 89 years (median age: 64 years). Fifty-seven patients (81.5%) had cervical stenosis as the surgical indication. Of the remaining cases, 11 patients had fractures and two had tumors. Among the 468 pedicle screws placed, 434 were graded as 0-1. The correct placement rate was 92.7%. Thirty-four screws were malpositioned (grade 2-3), representing a rate of 7.3%.
Conclusion: In our case series, the accuracy of cervical subaxial pedicle screw placement was high. We believe that achieving this level of accuracy requires a strong understanding of anatomy, three-dimensional spatial awareness, and surgical experience.