ICU入院后48小时内死亡患者的生命支持治疗局限性:一项法国多中心观察性探索性研究。

IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-08-06 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001300
Aurélie Nouvel, Pierre Leprovost, Charlotte Larrat, Xavier Valette, Isabelle Vinatier, Agathe Delbove, David Schnell, Anne Renault, Pauline Cailliez, Maud Jonas, Pauline Guillot, Anthony Lemeur, Jean Reignier, Théophile Lancrey-Javal, Reyes Munoz Calahorro, Soline Bobet, Gauthier Blonz
{"title":"ICU入院后48小时内死亡患者的生命支持治疗局限性:一项法国多中心观察性探索性研究。","authors":"Aurélie Nouvel, Pierre Leprovost, Charlotte Larrat, Xavier Valette, Isabelle Vinatier, Agathe Delbove, David Schnell, Anne Renault, Pauline Cailliez, Maud Jonas, Pauline Guillot, Anthony Lemeur, Jean Reignier, Théophile Lancrey-Javal, Reyes Munoz Calahorro, Soline Bobet, Gauthier Blonz","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The occurrence of death shortly after ICU admission raises concerns about the appropriateness of providing intensive care to frail patients-many of whom are subsequently subject to decisions to limit life-supporting treatment limitation (LST-L). The proportion of patients who die early and are affected by such limitations remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to determine the proportion of patients with a decision of LST-L among patients who died within 48 hours after ICU admission. We also conducted analyses to identify variables associated with LST-L and collected staff perceptions.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A retrospective, observational, multicenter study with data collected immediately after the patient's death, according to predefined criteria. The study was conducted in 12 ICUs in France. Consecutive patients who died within 48 hours of ICU admission during the study period, in 2022-2023, were included. LST-L decisions were not guided by protocols but were at the discretion of the attending intensivists.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Of 1615 patients admitted to the participating ICUs during the study period, 100 died (6.2%) within 48 hours, including 62 with LST-L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the LST-L group, age was significantly older (72 yr [64-77.8 yr] vs. 63 yr [59.0-69.8 yr]; p = 0.002), Charlson Comorbidity Index significantly higher (5.5 [2.0-8.0] vs. 4.0 [2.0-5.0]; p < 0.001), and management less invasive compared with the full-care group. By multivariable analysis, male patients were less likely to have LST-L decisions (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.93; p = 0.03). Most physicians, but a smaller proportion of nurses, perceived LST-L decisions as consensual. For 28 of 100 patients, the intensivist retrospectively deemed the ICU admission not the most suitable option. Patient wishes were rarely considered when making LST-L decisions. Time-limited trials were rarely used. Two-thirds of LST-L decisions were made during on-call hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Deaths occurring shortly after ICU admission were usually preceded by LST-L decisions. Efforts are needed to better consider patients' wishes and to strengthen communication between ICU physicians and nursing staff, to ensure appropriate care-even when patients' wishes are unknown and alternatives to ICU admission are not straightforward. Such rare and sometimes unforeseeable cases may also reflect unspoken preferences of patients or their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 8","pages":"e1300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life-Supporting Treatment Limitations in Patients Who Die Within 48 Hours After ICU Admission: A French, Multicenter, Observational, Exploratory Study.\",\"authors\":\"Aurélie Nouvel, Pierre Leprovost, Charlotte Larrat, Xavier Valette, Isabelle Vinatier, Agathe Delbove, David Schnell, Anne Renault, Pauline Cailliez, Maud Jonas, Pauline Guillot, Anthony Lemeur, Jean Reignier, Théophile Lancrey-Javal, Reyes Munoz Calahorro, Soline Bobet, Gauthier Blonz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The occurrence of death shortly after ICU admission raises concerns about the appropriateness of providing intensive care to frail patients-many of whom are subsequently subject to decisions to limit life-supporting treatment limitation (LST-L). The proportion of patients who die early and are affected by such limitations remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to determine the proportion of patients with a decision of LST-L among patients who died within 48 hours after ICU admission. We also conducted analyses to identify variables associated with LST-L and collected staff perceptions.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A retrospective, observational, multicenter study with data collected immediately after the patient's death, according to predefined criteria. The study was conducted in 12 ICUs in France. Consecutive patients who died within 48 hours of ICU admission during the study period, in 2022-2023, were included. LST-L decisions were not guided by protocols but were at the discretion of the attending intensivists.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Of 1615 patients admitted to the participating ICUs during the study period, 100 died (6.2%) within 48 hours, including 62 with LST-L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the LST-L group, age was significantly older (72 yr [64-77.8 yr] vs. 63 yr [59.0-69.8 yr]; p = 0.002), Charlson Comorbidity Index significantly higher (5.5 [2.0-8.0] vs. 4.0 [2.0-5.0]; p < 0.001), and management less invasive compared with the full-care group. By multivariable analysis, male patients were less likely to have LST-L decisions (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.93; p = 0.03). Most physicians, but a smaller proportion of nurses, perceived LST-L decisions as consensual. For 28 of 100 patients, the intensivist retrospectively deemed the ICU admission not the most suitable option. Patient wishes were rarely considered when making LST-L decisions. Time-limited trials were rarely used. Two-thirds of LST-L decisions were made during on-call hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Deaths occurring shortly after ICU admission were usually preceded by LST-L decisions. Efforts are needed to better consider patients' wishes and to strengthen communication between ICU physicians and nursing staff, to ensure appropriate care-even when patients' wishes are unknown and alternatives to ICU admission are not straightforward. Such rare and sometimes unforeseeable cases may also reflect unspoken preferences of patients or their families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"7 8\",\"pages\":\"e1300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330360/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:ICU入院后不久死亡的发生引起了对向虚弱患者提供重症监护的适当性的关注-其中许多患者随后受到限制生命支持治疗限制(LST-L)的决定。早期死亡和受这些限制影响的患者比例仍然未知。目的:主要目的是确定在ICU入院后48小时内死亡的患者中决定LST-L的患者比例。我们还进行了分析,以确定与LST-L相关的变量,并收集了员工的看法。设计、环境和参与者:一项回顾性、观察性、多中心研究,根据预先确定的标准,在患者死亡后立即收集数据。该研究在法国的12个icu中进行。纳入研究期间(2022-2023年)在ICU入院48小时内连续死亡的患者。LST-L的决定不受协议的指导,而是由主治重症医师自行决定。主要结局和指标:研究期间入icu的1615例患者中,有100例(6.2%)在48小时内死亡,其中62例为LST-L。结果:LST-L组患者年龄明显偏大(72岁[64-77.8岁]vs. 63岁[59.0-69.8岁];p = 0.002), Charlson共病指数显著增高(5.5 [2.0-8.0]vs. 4.0 [2.0-5.0];P < 0.001),与全面护理组相比,治疗的侵入性更小。通过多变量分析,男性患者做出LST-L决定的可能性较小(优势比,0.35;95% ci, 0.13-0.93;P = 0.03)。大多数医生,但一小部分护士,认为LST-L的决定是双方同意的。100例患者中有28例,重症监护医师回顾性地认为ICU入院不是最合适的选择。在做出LST-L决定时,很少考虑患者的意愿。有时间限制的试验很少使用。三分之二的LST-L决策是在随叫随到的时间做出的。结论和相关性:ICU入院后不久发生的死亡通常先于LST-L决定。需要努力更好地考虑患者的意愿,加强ICU医生和护理人员之间的沟通,以确保适当的护理-即使患者的愿望是未知的,ICU入院的替代方案并不直截了当。这种罕见的,有时无法预见的病例也可能反映了患者或其家属的潜在偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Life-Supporting Treatment Limitations in Patients Who Die Within 48 Hours After ICU Admission: A French, Multicenter, Observational, Exploratory Study.

Life-Supporting Treatment Limitations in Patients Who Die Within 48 Hours After ICU Admission: A French, Multicenter, Observational, Exploratory Study.

Life-Supporting Treatment Limitations in Patients Who Die Within 48 Hours After ICU Admission: A French, Multicenter, Observational, Exploratory Study.

Life-Supporting Treatment Limitations in Patients Who Die Within 48 Hours After ICU Admission: A French, Multicenter, Observational, Exploratory Study.

Life-Supporting Treatment Limitations in Patients Who Die Within 48 Hours After ICU Admission: A French, Multicenter, Observational, Exploratory Study.

Life-Supporting Treatment Limitations in Patients Who Die Within 48 Hours After ICU Admission: A French, Multicenter, Observational, Exploratory Study.

Life-Supporting Treatment Limitations in Patients Who Die Within 48 Hours After ICU Admission: A French, Multicenter, Observational, Exploratory Study.

Importance: The occurrence of death shortly after ICU admission raises concerns about the appropriateness of providing intensive care to frail patients-many of whom are subsequently subject to decisions to limit life-supporting treatment limitation (LST-L). The proportion of patients who die early and are affected by such limitations remains unknown.

Objectives: The primary objective was to determine the proportion of patients with a decision of LST-L among patients who died within 48 hours after ICU admission. We also conducted analyses to identify variables associated with LST-L and collected staff perceptions.

Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective, observational, multicenter study with data collected immediately after the patient's death, according to predefined criteria. The study was conducted in 12 ICUs in France. Consecutive patients who died within 48 hours of ICU admission during the study period, in 2022-2023, were included. LST-L decisions were not guided by protocols but were at the discretion of the attending intensivists.

Main outcomes and measures: Of 1615 patients admitted to the participating ICUs during the study period, 100 died (6.2%) within 48 hours, including 62 with LST-L.

Results: In the LST-L group, age was significantly older (72 yr [64-77.8 yr] vs. 63 yr [59.0-69.8 yr]; p = 0.002), Charlson Comorbidity Index significantly higher (5.5 [2.0-8.0] vs. 4.0 [2.0-5.0]; p < 0.001), and management less invasive compared with the full-care group. By multivariable analysis, male patients were less likely to have LST-L decisions (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.93; p = 0.03). Most physicians, but a smaller proportion of nurses, perceived LST-L decisions as consensual. For 28 of 100 patients, the intensivist retrospectively deemed the ICU admission not the most suitable option. Patient wishes were rarely considered when making LST-L decisions. Time-limited trials were rarely used. Two-thirds of LST-L decisions were made during on-call hours.

Conclusions and relevance: Deaths occurring shortly after ICU admission were usually preceded by LST-L decisions. Efforts are needed to better consider patients' wishes and to strengthen communication between ICU physicians and nursing staff, to ensure appropriate care-even when patients' wishes are unknown and alternatives to ICU admission are not straightforward. Such rare and sometimes unforeseeable cases may also reflect unspoken preferences of patients or their families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信