医学生对美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步过渡到及格/不及格的看法。

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2024-07-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.19975.2
Samiksha Prasad, Christine Perez, Kate J F Carnevale
{"title":"医学生对美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步过渡到及格/不及格的看法。","authors":"Samiksha Prasad, Christine Perez, Kate J F Carnevale","doi":"10.12688/mep.19975.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The transition of the United States Medical Licensing Exam: Step 1 to Pass/Fail (P/F), from scored, caused uncertainty about students' preparedness and wellbeing related to the exam. Comparison of study behavior and results, before and after the P/F transition can provide insights for the medical curriculum and student support. The aim of this study is to evaluate students' perceptions of their efforts in Step 1 preparation, as compared to cohort performances to determine the impact of the transition of Step 1 to P/F on medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from four cohorts of second-year medical students (Class of 2022-25, N = 204) were collected from their dedicated Step 1 self-study block. Student study regiments, aggregate practice test results, Step 1 pass rates and post-block self-reported surveys were analyzed qualitatively to compare student effort and outcomes for scores and P/F cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of practice exam averages across the four student cohorts demonstrates a potentially slower and less rigorous start to Step 1 self-studying during the dedicated preparation block for the cohorts that took the P/F Step 1 exam format as compared to the previous cohorts that prepared for a scored Step 1 exam. Similarly, self-reported study regiments decreased in the median number of hours/day and number of weeks of study for the cohorts with P/F Step 1 exam. There was also a slight shift in the type of study resources used, between the two groups, with the scored group using more traditional board preparation resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The P/F transition of the Step 1 exam may lead to reduced student preparedness and may require adjustments in the resources and support provided by institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"14 ","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical students' perspective on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 transition to Pass/Fail.\",\"authors\":\"Samiksha Prasad, Christine Perez, Kate J F Carnevale\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/mep.19975.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The transition of the United States Medical Licensing Exam: Step 1 to Pass/Fail (P/F), from scored, caused uncertainty about students' preparedness and wellbeing related to the exam. Comparison of study behavior and results, before and after the P/F transition can provide insights for the medical curriculum and student support. The aim of this study is to evaluate students' perceptions of their efforts in Step 1 preparation, as compared to cohort performances to determine the impact of the transition of Step 1 to P/F on medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from four cohorts of second-year medical students (Class of 2022-25, N = 204) were collected from their dedicated Step 1 self-study block. Student study regiments, aggregate practice test results, Step 1 pass rates and post-block self-reported surveys were analyzed qualitatively to compare student effort and outcomes for scores and P/F cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of practice exam averages across the four student cohorts demonstrates a potentially slower and less rigorous start to Step 1 self-studying during the dedicated preparation block for the cohorts that took the P/F Step 1 exam format as compared to the previous cohorts that prepared for a scored Step 1 exam. Similarly, self-reported study regiments decreased in the median number of hours/day and number of weeks of study for the cohorts with P/F Step 1 exam. There was also a slight shift in the type of study resources used, between the two groups, with the scored group using more traditional board preparation resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The P/F transition of the Step 1 exam may lead to reduced student preparedness and may require adjustments in the resources and support provided by institutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322661/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19975.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19975.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国医师执照考试:从分数到及格/不及格(P/F)的过渡,对学生的准备和与考试相关的健康造成了不确定性。比较P/F转换前后的学习行为和结果,可以为医学课程设置和学生支持提供启示。本研究的目的是评估学生对第一步准备工作的看法,并与队列表现进行比较,以确定第一步向P/F过渡对医学生的影响。方法:从四组医学二年级学生(2022-25班,N = 204)中收集数据,这些数据来自他们专门的第1步自学区。对学生学习小组、综合实践测试结果、第1步通过率和块后自我报告调查进行定性分析,比较学生的努力和分数和P/F队列的结果。结果:对四个学生队列的实践考试平均值的分析表明,与之前准备得分的第1步考试的队列相比,参加P/F第1步考试格式的队列在专门准备模块期间开始第1步自学的速度可能更慢,也不那么严格。同样,在P/F第1步检查的队列中,自我报告的学习团的中位数每天小时数和学习周数也有所减少。两组之间使用的学习资源类型也有轻微的变化,得分组使用更传统的董事会准备资源。结论:第一步考试的P/F过渡可能导致学生准备不足,可能需要调整机构提供的资源和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Medical students' perspective on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 transition to Pass/Fail.

Medical students' perspective on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 transition to Pass/Fail.

Medical students' perspective on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 transition to Pass/Fail.

Medical students' perspective on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 transition to Pass/Fail.

Background: The transition of the United States Medical Licensing Exam: Step 1 to Pass/Fail (P/F), from scored, caused uncertainty about students' preparedness and wellbeing related to the exam. Comparison of study behavior and results, before and after the P/F transition can provide insights for the medical curriculum and student support. The aim of this study is to evaluate students' perceptions of their efforts in Step 1 preparation, as compared to cohort performances to determine the impact of the transition of Step 1 to P/F on medical students.

Methods: Data from four cohorts of second-year medical students (Class of 2022-25, N = 204) were collected from their dedicated Step 1 self-study block. Student study regiments, aggregate practice test results, Step 1 pass rates and post-block self-reported surveys were analyzed qualitatively to compare student effort and outcomes for scores and P/F cohorts.

Results: Analysis of practice exam averages across the four student cohorts demonstrates a potentially slower and less rigorous start to Step 1 self-studying during the dedicated preparation block for the cohorts that took the P/F Step 1 exam format as compared to the previous cohorts that prepared for a scored Step 1 exam. Similarly, self-reported study regiments decreased in the median number of hours/day and number of weeks of study for the cohorts with P/F Step 1 exam. There was also a slight shift in the type of study resources used, between the two groups, with the scored group using more traditional board preparation resources.

Conclusions: The P/F transition of the Step 1 exam may lead to reduced student preparedness and may require adjustments in the resources and support provided by institutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信